It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: LDragonFire
a reply to: NavyDoc
I have already admitted all races have a percentage that is racist! Obama's party didn't need to have a autopsy to figure out why they wasn't getting the votes of minorities. Do a percentage of minorities support Obama based on race, of course they do. Did republicans do anything with the autopsy they preformed, Nope!
originally posted by: onequestion
a reply to: NavyDoc
Oh god.
Let's reduce the conversation down to rape and murder to appeal to readers emotions.
Bull#, They couldn't move to the back of the bus because it was packed and the bus driver was being racist about it.
originally posted by: Sremmos80
a reply to: NavyDoc
We all know the war on drugs was Regan's baby....
I would agree tho every president after that kept it going has blame it in as well tho.
"When the present administration took office ten countries had ratified the Geneva Narcotic Limitation Convention. The United States was one of these ten.... It was my privilege, as President, to proclaim, on that day, that this treaty had become effective throughout the jurisdiction of the United States....On Jan. 1, 1933, only nine nations had registered their ratification of the limitation treaty. On Jan. 1, 1935, only nine States had adopted the uniform State statute. As 1933 witnessed ratification of the treaty by thirty-one additional nations, so may 1935 witness the adoption of the uniform drug act by at least thirty-one more states, thereby placing interstate accord abreast of international accord, to the honor of the legislative bodies of our States and for the promotion of the welfare of our people and the peoples of other lands."
—Franklin D. Roosevelt, March 1935 in a radio message read by United States Attorney General, Homer Stille Cumm
This s has nothing to do with race. It is the American blacks that are a problem.
originally posted by: Sremmos80
a reply to: NavyDoc
Did I not say I don't agree with how they do what they do?
I was saying I agree with people standing up for civil rights, which is their principle cause they just take it way over board a majority of the time
originally posted by: onequestion
a reply to: NavyDoc
Show me how your perspective is solving the problem?
originally posted by: Sremmos80
a reply to: NavyDoc
Bull#, They couldn't move to the back of the bus because it was packed and the bus driver was being racist about it.
Doc, how do you know what was going on in the bus?
It could be just as possible that they just didn't want to move.
Not sure how it works on public transport, if you have to move if your are asked/told to or not, but I do know they driver is the authority figure in the bus.
Were they just showing lack of respect to authority?
originally posted by: OrionsGem
originally posted by: NavyDoc
originally posted by: OrionsGem
a reply to: chuck258
OP Thanks for posting this. I have friends of all colors. What happened with this family is unacceptable and I believe may or may not have been racially motivated.
I can speculate tho that because the family was white and refused to move to the back of the bus, they were thought of as acting superior or better than the other races present on the bus. I believe this is where the anger came from...lets not forget that being forced to the back of the bus was a big deal for a while with african american folks.
Perhaps this is where the anger originated from the bus driver?
I can tell you this: Racism is the most ignorant thing in the world.
I myself am a white eastern european. Today I was walking my dog and came across 3 black highschool kids who were sitting on a bench. We exchanged hellos and proceeded to introduce ourselves and ended up having a really cool discussion on conspiracy's on the coming world war, chem-trails, etc. Turned out to be some really cool intelligent kids.
I guess what im trying to say that all races have their bad apples but being a racist is super duper ignorant no matter if your black or white, yellow or purple. Whats inside is what counts, we all have to get out there and interact with each other, and we will soon quickly realize we all have the same loves, fears, dreams. We are all the same folks.
OG
Bull#, They couldn't move to the back of the bus because it was packed and the bus driver was being racist about it.
Whats exactly is BS about my post? I never said it wasn't racially motivated. How about reading first.
I can speculate tho that because the family was white and refused to move to the back of the bus, they were thought of as acting superior or better than the other races present on the bus. I believe this is where the anger came from...lets not forget that being forced to the back of the bus was a big deal for a while with african american folks
You seem to start out with excuses that justifies a racist act by the bus driver.
originally posted by: LDragonFire
I'm not a big fan of either Sharpton or Franken, or Jackson, however one thing these men have in common are the friends and colleagues they have lost to prison, murder and assassination fighting for civil rights.
How about you? Have you lost people to these things fighting for your cause?
You were against Martin, Brown and this bus driver way before any real evidence was presented.
originally posted by: Sremmos80
a reply to: NavyDoc
Yes I would say she was, and she had every right to as it was an unjust law she was standing up to.
Not sure how that correlates to this situation.
And what I was saying about the driver is that usually what they say goes on a bus