It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: adjensen
a reply to: Prezbo369
Church teaching has not changed, which is that homosexuals are welcome in the church, homosexual activity is not, any more than heterosexual activity outside of marriage is.
originally posted by: adjensen
a reply to: Prezbo369
I know that you enjoy wallowing in your own ignorance, because it buttresses your hatred of Christianity, but I'll give you one last shot at demonstrating some intelligence in understanding the church's position.
As a church, the Catholic Church has standards of behaviour for participating in its sacraments, one of which is that, if one has not received the sacrament of marriage, they are to remain celibate. Period. Practicing homosexuals are not denied membership in the church, they are not refused other sacraments, such as reconciliation, they are refused access to the Sacrament of the Eucharist, because they reject the church's teaching on celibacy. A non-practicing homosexual is not denied access to the Eucharist. These are exactly the same standards that are in place for heterosexuals.
Claiming that the church is practicing bigotry by having standards that must be adhered to in order to participate in certain functions is as empty-headed as saying that the government is practicing bigotry by saying that you have to be 18 years old to vote.
Do not wear clothes of wool and linen woven together. Make tassels on the four corners of the cloak you wear.
Deuteronomy 22: 11-12
So we can expect Rome to start accepting gay marriage soon, then?
So gays can't receive the Sacrament due to not being married
Do not wear clothes of wool and linen woven together. Make tassels on the four corners of the cloak you wear.
Deuteronomy 22: 11-12
originally posted by: tavi45
Eh. Gay rights activists aren't focused on churches. No one (or at least very few) has threatened the church in America. Gays want civil legal protections. Sadly the Christians brought their church into our government. It seems only fair then that I can question the church since the church questions me.
In my opinion we need to bring back the Constitution. The church and religious based arguments should be removed from government. If your religion doesn't believe in equal rights then you should educate your children at religious schools. It's utterly ridiculous that American citizens should be left without legal protections because the Christians are so incapable of following their own religion without disturbing others. Marriage is first and foremost a civil institution. It existed before Christianity and would survive without it. How about churches create a new word or use one of the old ones like wedlock or matrimony. Technically the sacrament is called "Holy Matrimony" already.
The whole thing is insane on the part of Christians. I don't tell you how to live. Why should you get to determine my life? Clean your own house before you start telling me how to live. At least I pay my taxes unlike the church.
originally posted by: AnteBellum
The church just recanted the statement.
Bishops were arguing and they took it all back, gays will have no place in the church.
I'd post it but I'm on my phone. Look at International Business Times for article.
originally posted by: tavi45
a reply to: Serdgiam
Yeah that's why I'm not a gay rights activist despite being gay. I just want to live my life like anyone else. Sadly that's not really allowed. I've been mistreated by many businesses when I go out with my boyfriend and I live in a very very heavily blue area.
No one is forcing the church to perform gay marriages so the victimization of homophobic Christians is pathetic.
It's just so tiring hearing people talk about protecting freedom while imposing their views on others.
But what's the answer? Do I just keep to myself like I want to, risking my own freedoms through inaction? Do I start being an activist, becoming part of the problem? It's mind boggling.