It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Daystar
Oh dont get me wrong, paisley is also a pain in the @$$ in my opinion
but my point is; Why let a few photographs standing in the way of a half-decent chance of peace?
if you support the republican view then still you might think "Just give them the photos and shut them up so we can get to the more important issues of building a lasting peace"
Originally posted by Daystar
america doesn't allow photos, true, but the weapons that would be photographed by the NI observers would be destroyed afterwards
this is not an issue of showing your enemy your strength
[/qutoe]
To them it is probably.
This is not an issue of liking or disliking the Irish, north or south
[/qutoe]
I was stateing my opinion of the situation so i would not be claimed as biased.
this is IRA trying to have its cake and eat it
Says who though?
Originally posted by devilwasp
I don't support the killing but i do think if they want to join ireland its fine with me if they dont its a ok with me.
Originally posted by sminkeypinkey
He attempted to 'crown' his 'career' with the humiliation of the republican movement in Ireland.
Originally posted by jsobecky
What is wrong with the destruction of the weapons being witnessed by both sides, without photographs? It seems that the destruction is the important element, not the 8X10 glossies.
Originally posted by Nygdan
But the problem is that there was a vote for all the counties of ireland to saty in the kingdom or leave and form the irish republic. All the counties agreed to it except whats now Northern Ireland.
I'm sure the catholics will outbreed those anglicans anyway right?
Not for nuthin' but shouldn't the IRA be willing to humiliate themselves in order to unify the island?
You said you were english living in NI, do you want to be part of the Republic?
this is part of punishment they duely deserve.
Originally posted by sminkeypinkey
N. Ireland contained at least 2 counties with a 'nationalist' or republican majority at it's creation.
- As I said, my view is immaterial (personally I agree, they should go for it) but then I'm not the people that need persuading.
So all in all no.
Originally posted by Nygdan
So was the cessesion issue decided on something other than a county level, or did they not want to have a british 'entity' surrounded by irish republican counties or what? IOW, if they voted to join the republic, then why didn't they join the republic?
Why did britain force some to stay but let, well, anyone go?
But if the people with the power to derail everything (in this case these paisley people) aren't going to budge, then its everyones fault no? Someone has to move right? If the IRA's position is irrational, why shouldn't they be expected to change it?
Interesting, haven't heard much of hte enlgish in NI position on it really. So you are expecting things to be pretty much the same if you were to become an irish citizen?.
Originally posted by sminkeypinkey
There was an all-Ireland vote in 1919 but that was for the gov of Ireland and not about the border.
Why did britain force some to stay but let, well, anyone go?
Originally posted by Nygdan
Ah, well that certainly changes things doesn't it.
You sure it wasn't 'pre-eminence'? j/k. My understanding of the situtation has been wrong then. Glad to get something out of the discussion.