It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.


Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.


Help ATS via PayPal:
learn more

Ebola Hoax

page: 2
<< 1   >>

log in


posted on Oct, 10 2014 @ 06:53 PM

originally posted by: pai mei
a reply to: ManBehindTheMask

It says that even if the wonder drug cured him of ebola, he could not have walked the second day. So he did not have it.

And how do they know he couldnt walk? How many times has this drug been administered before to know how people react to it after?

There are a lot of variables in that case just to come out and say "yeah it wasnt ebola" or its fake.......

posted on Oct, 10 2014 @ 07:08 PM
click me


looks like more people should have paid attention to my thread at the very beginning.

I probably would have convinced more ppl by putting it in dreams and predictions though

posted on Oct, 10 2014 @ 07:17 PM
Just waiting for a thread saying Ebola is our neo evolution and we all become mutant's.

posted on Oct, 10 2014 @ 08:11 PM

originally posted by: pai mei
a reply to: Yeahkeepwatchingme

Nevermind the rest of the video could be any "conspiracy theorist" and his ramblings. But what happens at minute 6, shows ebola actors.

I watched minute 6 Im trying to figure out how you came to that conclusion. You realize one of the side effects of ebola is delirium right?

posted on Oct, 10 2014 @ 08:38 PM
I think people ARE dying from Ebola.
But I don't believe all the hype.....I think the media are way over reacting.
Governments and the WHO don't seem to be acting as much as they did with the so called " Swine flu " and that never really came to anything.

posted on Oct, 10 2014 @ 08:57 PM
a reply to: pai mei

Probably is BUT.
It is from a country that has reached crises point so would not surprise me if they try anything for help.

edit on 10-10-2014 by joho99 because: (no reason given)

posted on Oct, 10 2014 @ 09:22 PM
Thanks for the video OP. It was an eye opener. I remember naked Africans were always portrayed on National Geographic when I was a kid. I guess stereotypes are difficult to let go...especially for script writers.

I for one, believe ebola is a hoax. That's my belief based on evidence and the FACT corporate media has hoaxed many events and has been busted in lie after lie after lie. MSM is not objective reporting, it is purely propaganda and entertainment. Oh, and the Neilsen Ratings (Sweeps) will begin at the end of October so grab your popcorn folks.

posted on Oct, 10 2014 @ 09:29 PM
a reply to: hurdygurdy

If you really think that how do you know they did not set you up with a cry wolf?

posted on Oct, 10 2014 @ 09:50 PM
"BREAKING: Formaldeyde in Water Allegedly Causing Ebola-like Symptoms"

I wonder why there isn't traditional symptoms.

Isil, ebola, and the elites wetdream and some of it is real murder and mayhem because they are really really evil asshats who need to be arrested and this world set free. My God, Isil is overtaking Bagdad, while women are sacrificing their lives to try and save their freedom. And no one from the West of Europe knows what the target is to stop it, oops there goes the hospitals eh!!!!! I am fed up beyond.

Ebola is very much a hoax IMO, some of it faked and some of it real but its not the real disease.

And I will not live in fear of their crapola, but envision vividly their arrests.
edit on 10-10-2014 by Unity_99 because: (no reason given)

posted on Oct, 11 2014 @ 12:37 AM
Jon Rappoport has a very definite opinion about the Ebola thing being a set up and suspects its being used to cover up a whole range of African deaths from other causes - like intentional poisoning, malnutrition, etc. Here's a list of his writings on the topic from his blog.

You’re looking at the construction of reality, which is then sold. Take this example—a farming village in Liberia, one of the so-called epicenters of Ebola. The families manage to produce enough to get by. They live downstream from a giant Firestone rubber plantation. For years, to no avail, the people of the village have been protesting the runoff of noxious elements into their water supply. Fish are dying. Crops are failing. That means malnutrition, hunger. That means chemical assault on their immune systems.

People are developing sores, lesions, fevers, respiratory problems, digestive problems, including diarrhea. How easy is it to call this Ebola, in light of the current hysteria? “Everyone knows” it’s Ebola. But it isn’t. People are obsessed by the idea that a whole population, in far-off nation, under the gun, must all be suffering from One Thing—in this case, a virus.

Splitting this apart into a number of different causes in different regions—contaminated water, open sewage, severe malnutrition, decimating wars, toxic vaccine campaigns, the vast overuse of antibiotics, industrial pollution—this doesn’t have the compelling ring of: “It’s a virus.” So people say, “Forget about all that. We don’t want to know about it. We know it’s a virus.” No they don’t.

Certainly, the answer to “who benefits” is the pharmaceutical industry, since every so-called epidemic “requires” very large supplies of drugs and vaccines. But aside from these bosses, another set of key players is exposed if you ask yourself: What kind of control would those players seek to have? Well, first and foremost, they would want to control information about the initial “outbreak.” They would want to be able to promote the idea that, in the region where the “outbreak” is occurring, the numbers of ill and dying people are suddenly escalating.

These reported “new numbers” may or may not be accurate. It doesn’t matter. It only matters that people believe the new numbers. The controlling players must have the means to convince one and all that the reason for the new numbers is a single germ. How do the players guarantee this? Two ways. One, by nakedly asserting a germ has been found as the cause. And second, by backing up that assertion with a diagnostic test that will come up positive for the presence of the germ. The test, however, will be a fraud. It will show indirect markers for the germ. These markers are not, in fact, valid evidence. If you read my prior work on antibody tests and the PCR test, you will understand how this fraud is accomplished.

—Now, ask yourself, who has the power to control all these aspects of a promoted “epidemic?” The answer is: public health agencies. And in particular, the two most powerful health agencies on the planet—the CDC and the World Health Organization (WHO). Both agencies are covert-ops specialists. Their single most important client is the pharmaceutical industry. The CDC and WHO control announcements of when and where “outbreaks” occur. They control the reports of the case numbers and deaths from the “epidemic.” They decide which diagnostic tests are to be run and accepted.

They announce details about transmission and incubation-periods of viruses. They are the sources of all key information about epidemics. They build the reality. They are, in the medical arena, the Reality Manufacturing Corporation.

Here’s another quote: “[The PCR test] should not be used as the sole basis for patient management decisions. Results [of the PCR] are for the presumptive identification of the Ebola Zaire virus (detected in the West Africa outbreak in 2014).”

Translation: “The word ‘presumptive’ means ‘we’re not sure’. And that’s right. We’re not sure. Don’t rely on the PCR for a definitive diagnosis of Ebola.”

Here is the final quote: “The definitive identification of the Ebola Zaire virus (detected in the West Africa outbreak in 2014) requires additional testing and confirmation procedures in consultation with public health or other authorities for whom reporting is required. The diagnosis of Ebola Zaire virus (detected in the West Africa outbreak in 2014) infection must be made based on history, signs, symptoms, exposure likelihood, and other laboratory evidence in addition to the identification of the Ebola Zaire virus (detected in the West Africa outbreak in 2014) by this [PCR] test.”

That’s the capper. It baldly states that other diagnostic tests must be run. I can tell you what those other tests should be. One, purification and direct isolation of the virus from the patient; and two, a test to determine the amount of virus in the patient—because millions and millions of active Ebola virus must be present in the patient to even begin to say he is “an Ebola case.” And I can tell you these tests are not being run on so-called Ebola patients. Therefore, this whole “Ebola event” is the blind leading the blind.

“I saw people die from Ebola.” No you didn’t. You saw people die. You yourself have no idea what killed them. You can pretend you know, but you don’t. “The doctors know what kills people.” You win a gold star for your faith. You’re now a fully-fledged member of the Church of Biological Mysticism.

People who see other people die often assume they know why it happened. Certainly, when it comes to viruses, they don’t have a clue. They’re sure they know. That doesn’t make them right. A parent’s healthy son returns from the doctor’s office, saying he just found out he’s HIV-positive. He tells his mother the doctor has put him on AZT. Three weeks later, the boy folds up, can’t get out of bed. He’s so weak he can hardly move. The doctor says, “HIV has spiraled out of control. It’s full-blown AIDS. He must continue taking his AZT.” Three months later, the boy is dead. The mother says, “My son died of HIV.”

Does she know that AZT, a failed chemotherapy drug, was taken off the shelf for AIDS patients, and that it mercilessly attack all cells of the body, including the immune-system cells? Of course not. As I’ve repeatedly pointed out over the past 27 years (starting with my first book, “AIDS Inc., Scandal of the Century”), covert medical ops will use death and dying to construct a false picture of the cause of death and dying. They know this strategy works, because people, seeing death, will accept what the authorities tell them caused it.

I personally have no clue what's real or not 'out there' regarding Ebola - but I do know the MSM reports what they're told and governments lie and all the ridiculous 'mistakes' being made by them could be part of the 'plan'...

posted on Oct, 11 2014 @ 09:49 AM

originally posted by: pai mei
a reply to: Yeahkeepwatchingme

Nevermind the rest of the video could be any "conspiracy theorist" and his ramblings. But what happens at minute 6, shows ebola actors.

Awesome!! I must have missed the proof showing they are actors..
Oh wait you don't have any, you just have your opinion.

posted on Oct, 11 2014 @ 11:43 AM
the thread you closed and linked this one too was far better in comments and discussion.

Ebola may very well be manufactured but not always on purpose go here to read how you can create bacteria and viruses in your own back yard.

By the way, the hospital where I work has three whole Ebola Isolation carts in the CS dept, and there is no way it could handle a pandemic situation.

edit on 11-10-2014 by ChesterJohn because: (no reason given)

new topics

top topics

<< 1   >>

log in