It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: pai mei
a reply to: ManBehindTheMask
It says that even if the wonder drug cured him of ebola, he could not have walked the second day. So he did not have it.
originally posted by: pai mei
a reply to: Yeahkeepwatchingme
Nevermind the rest of the video could be any "conspiracy theorist" and his ramblings. But what happens at minute 6, shows ebola actors.
removingtheshackles.blogspot.ca...
You’re looking at the construction of reality, which is then sold. Take this example—a farming village in Liberia, one of the so-called epicenters of Ebola. The families manage to produce enough to get by. They live downstream from a giant Firestone rubber plantation. For years, to no avail, the people of the village have been protesting the runoff of noxious elements into their water supply. Fish are dying. Crops are failing. That means malnutrition, hunger. That means chemical assault on their immune systems.
People are developing sores, lesions, fevers, respiratory problems, digestive problems, including diarrhea. How easy is it to call this Ebola, in light of the current hysteria? “Everyone knows” it’s Ebola. But it isn’t. People are obsessed by the idea that a whole population, in far-off nation, under the gun, must all be suffering from One Thing—in this case, a virus.
Splitting this apart into a number of different causes in different regions—contaminated water, open sewage, severe malnutrition, decimating wars, toxic vaccine campaigns, the vast overuse of antibiotics, industrial pollution—this doesn’t have the compelling ring of: “It’s a virus.” So people say, “Forget about all that. We don’t want to know about it. We know it’s a virus.” No they don’t.
Certainly, the answer to “who benefits” is the pharmaceutical industry, since every so-called epidemic “requires” very large supplies of drugs and vaccines. But aside from these bosses, another set of key players is exposed if you ask yourself: What kind of control would those players seek to have? Well, first and foremost, they would want to control information about the initial “outbreak.” They would want to be able to promote the idea that, in the region where the “outbreak” is occurring, the numbers of ill and dying people are suddenly escalating.
These reported “new numbers” may or may not be accurate. It doesn’t matter. It only matters that people believe the new numbers. The controlling players must have the means to convince one and all that the reason for the new numbers is a single germ. How do the players guarantee this? Two ways. One, by nakedly asserting a germ has been found as the cause. And second, by backing up that assertion with a diagnostic test that will come up positive for the presence of the germ. The test, however, will be a fraud. It will show indirect markers for the germ. These markers are not, in fact, valid evidence. If you read my prior work on antibody tests and the PCR test, you will understand how this fraud is accomplished.
—Now, ask yourself, who has the power to control all these aspects of a promoted “epidemic?” The answer is: public health agencies. And in particular, the two most powerful health agencies on the planet—the CDC and the World Health Organization (WHO). Both agencies are covert-ops specialists. Their single most important client is the pharmaceutical industry. The CDC and WHO control announcements of when and where “outbreaks” occur. They control the reports of the case numbers and deaths from the “epidemic.” They decide which diagnostic tests are to be run and accepted.
They announce details about transmission and incubation-periods of viruses. They are the sources of all key information about epidemics. They build the reality. They are, in the medical arena, the Reality Manufacturing Corporation.
Here’s another quote: “[The PCR test] should not be used as the sole basis for patient management decisions. Results [of the PCR] are for the presumptive identification of the Ebola Zaire virus (detected in the West Africa outbreak in 2014).”
Translation: “The word ‘presumptive’ means ‘we’re not sure’. And that’s right. We’re not sure. Don’t rely on the PCR for a definitive diagnosis of Ebola.”
Here is the final quote: “The definitive identification of the Ebola Zaire virus (detected in the West Africa outbreak in 2014) requires additional testing and confirmation procedures in consultation with public health or other authorities for whom reporting is required. The diagnosis of Ebola Zaire virus (detected in the West Africa outbreak in 2014) infection must be made based on history, signs, symptoms, exposure likelihood, and other laboratory evidence in addition to the identification of the Ebola Zaire virus (detected in the West Africa outbreak in 2014) by this [PCR] test.”
That’s the capper. It baldly states that other diagnostic tests must be run. I can tell you what those other tests should be. One, purification and direct isolation of the virus from the patient; and two, a test to determine the amount of virus in the patient—because millions and millions of active Ebola virus must be present in the patient to even begin to say he is “an Ebola case.” And I can tell you these tests are not being run on so-called Ebola patients. Therefore, this whole “Ebola event” is the blind leading the blind.
“I saw people die from Ebola.” No you didn’t. You saw people die. You yourself have no idea what killed them. You can pretend you know, but you don’t. “The doctors know what kills people.” You win a gold star for your faith. You’re now a fully-fledged member of the Church of Biological Mysticism.
People who see other people die often assume they know why it happened. Certainly, when it comes to viruses, they don’t have a clue. They’re sure they know. That doesn’t make them right. A parent’s healthy son returns from the doctor’s office, saying he just found out he’s HIV-positive. He tells his mother the doctor has put him on AZT. Three weeks later, the boy folds up, can’t get out of bed. He’s so weak he can hardly move. The doctor says, “HIV has spiraled out of control. It’s full-blown AIDS. He must continue taking his AZT.” Three months later, the boy is dead. The mother says, “My son died of HIV.”
Does she know that AZT, a failed chemotherapy drug, was taken off the shelf for AIDS patients, and that it mercilessly attack all cells of the body, including the immune-system cells? Of course not. As I’ve repeatedly pointed out over the past 27 years (starting with my first book, “AIDS Inc., Scandal of the Century”), covert medical ops will use death and dying to construct a false picture of the cause of death and dying. They know this strategy works, because people, seeing death, will accept what the authorities tell them caused it.
originally posted by: pai mei
a reply to: Yeahkeepwatchingme
Nevermind the rest of the video could be any "conspiracy theorist" and his ramblings. But what happens at minute 6, shows ebola actors.