It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Masterjaden
a reply to: Indigo5
What arae you talking about, what do you provide to register to vote and GET your voter registration card????
I know in California, all you do is fill out a form and send it in, no verification whatsoever...
Jaden
originally posted by: Daedalus
originally posted by: Indigo5
For effs sake...You PURCHASE a GUN..It is a PURCHASE...You do not PURCHASE the right to vote. Voting is not a consumer transaction. The purchase of cigarettes, alcohol, guns et al are consumer transactions between private citizens.
incorrect...
you must purchase a permit, and a license.....those cost. therefore, it is a charge, to exercise a constitutionally protected right...
Birth - "All persons born or naturalized" "are citizens" of the United States and the U.S. state where they reside (14th Amendment, 1868)
"Race, color, or previous condition of servitude" - (15th Amendment, 1870)
"On account of sex" - (19th Amendment, 1920)
In Washington, D.C., presidential elections (23rd Amendment, 1961)
(For federal elections) "By reason of failure to pay any poll tax or other tax" - (24th Amendment, 1964) (For state elections) Taxes - (14th Amendment; Harper v. Virginia Board of Elections, 383 U.S. 663 (1966))
"Who are eighteen years of age or older, to vote, shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any state on account of age" (26th Amendment, 1971).
Requirement that a person reside in a jurisdiction for an extended period of time (14th Amendment; Dunn v. Blumstein, 405 U.S. 330 (1972))[3][4][4]
In addition, the 17th Amendment provided for the direct election of United States Senators.
The "right to vote" is not explicitly stated in the U.S. Constitution except in the above referenced amendments, and only in reference to the fact that the franchise cannot be denied or abridged based solely on the aforementioned qualifications. In other words, the "right to vote" is perhaps better understood, in layman's terms, as only prohibiting certain forms of legal discrimination in establishing qualifications for suffrage. States may deny the "right to vote" for other reasons.
originally posted by: Xcathdra
a reply to: Indigo5
Who can vote was left to the states.
Like most rights, the Second Amendment right is not unlimited. It is not a right to keep and carry any weapon whatsoever in any manner whatsoever and for whatever purpose: For example, concealed weapons prohibitions have been upheld under the Amendment or state analogues. The Court’s opinion should not be taken to cast doubt on longstanding prohibitions on the possession of firearms by felons and the mentally ill, or laws forbidding the carrying of firearms in sensitive places such as schools and government buildings, or laws imposing conditions and qualifications on the commercial sale of arms. Miller’s holding that the sorts of weapons protected are those “in common use at the time” finds support in the historical tradition of prohibiting the carrying of dangerous and unusual weapons. District of Columbia v. Heller, Pp. 54–56.
originally posted by: Daedalus
a reply to: Indigo5
Permits cost money. Licenses cost money. One, or both are required to exercise your constitutionally protected right to keep and bear arms...nobody said anything about government subsidizing firearm purchases, or getting guns for free.
originally posted by: macman
a reply to: Gryphon66
So, only infringement just a little bit...........for just a few..
Infringement is still infringement.
originally posted by: Xcathdra
a reply to: Indigo5
State voting requires an ID to vote. Federal voting does not.
originally posted by: Daedalus
a reply to: Indigo5
the constitution makes NO allowance for requiring a permit to carry(bear), it also makes no allowance for requiring a license to own(keep)...therefore, the requirement to have a license, and/or permit, to keep and bear are unconstitutional fees
originally posted by: Daedalus
a reply to: Indigo5
i'll say it again...and I.D. is NOT a fee associated with voting....and I.D. is required for MANY everyday activities...it is not SPECIFICALLY for voting... it's not a voting license, or voting permit...if it were, then it would absolutely be a poll tax... but it's not..
it's not a voting license, or voting permit...if it were, then it would absolutely be a poll tax... but it's not..
my issue is with people like you.
originally posted by: Gryphon66
So, since you persist in calling me something I'm not, and since our ideas seem to be antithetical to each other, I feel that it's fine for me to refer to you and your ideas as Regressive as the opposite of mine: I do hope you take no offense.
originally posted by: Gryphon66
I would just bet you're a States Righter (as well as being a Regressive). You must look to that issue for the handful of states that place requirements on purchase, style and method of carry.
originally posted by: Gryphon66
I'd be the first to state outright that you and your Regressive buddies have a specific and absolutist interpretation of what the 2nd means. For example, the question that you've previously dodged repeatedly, like most Regressives, should the mentally ill be able to purchase and carry firearms?
originally posted by: Gryphon66
If you say no (and my god I would hope you can at least say no to that) then you're also accepting, at least on your stated absolutist and Regressive terms, "a little infringement."
originally posted by: Gryphon66
Every Supreme Court case that addressed the issue (you know that body that has been created in the Constitution to address issues of Constitutionality) has maintained a similar variation on the concept that restricting certain types of weapons and/or certain categories of carriers:
originally posted by: Gryphon66
That is the current "law of the land" under the US Constitution, and yet, only affects gun purchase, registration and/or licensing in 13 US States, and only in a minority of those states does it affect anything other than handguns.
originally posted by: Indigo5
originally posted by: macman
a reply to: Gryphon66
So, only infringement just a little bit...........for just a few..
Infringement is still infringement.
No ..."Infringement" is whatever someone throwing a tantrum says it is.
I was taxed this morning buying a cup of coffee. My right to happiness was infringed upon.