It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: BELIEVERpriest
a reply to: 2wheelvet
ISIS is not an idea, its a CIA-Mossad joint operation. We wont do anything to hinder ISIS until they try to back their own independent currency with a commodity....its the same case as with Qadaffi, Saddam, and Hilter. Right now, they are thriving on American and Israeli resources, if/when they bite the hand that feeds, then you will see reall action against ISIS.
Ebola...who knows what's going on with that?
originally posted by: 2wheelvet
We are currently sending Soldiers to Liberia to help handle the ebola crisis over there. There are many people who say "why is the president sending them there instead of somewhere to fight ISIS?" Guess what people, sending them to either accomplishes nothing.
First let's talk ISIS, we can send troops to fight ISIS, but where do we send them? The whole thing about ISIS is that they are people who support an IDEA. This IDEA is already here with people in the United States. Sending troops to go fight and die somewhere else to supposedly make us safer here is a ridiculous plan.
Now for the ebola crisis. We can send troops to Liberia, to help contain the outbreak or whatever you want to call it. The thing is, it has already spread to other countries, including the United States. So sending troops to Liberia in no way makes the U.S. any safer, it only puts troops in more danger.
There you have it, sending troops to take care of everything you can think of is the wrong answer.