If you still had any doubt: journalist Udo Ulfkotte blows the whistle on media lies and public manip

Poison gas was supplied to Iraq during the war with Iran not just by Germany. The WMD line used against Saddam was true... Call it an inconvenient truth.

I think I read this on henrymakow as well.

a reply to: _damon

Bravo! A 13 minute video and nothing more.

originally posted by: ShadowLink
a reply to: _damon

Bravo! A 13 minute video and nothing more.

Well you really enlightened the thread with a meaningless sentence and no more.


I watched the video. He gives at least one specific example of a news story coming directly from intelligence agencies. You can tell he is telling the truth as well, if you are good at reading people.

It's a good watch.

a reply to: KnightLight

Yeah sorry, I wasn't able to enlighten the thread with my insights cause I'm unable to watch the video right now.

Double post

originally posted by: 727Sky
Poison gas was supplied to Iraq during the war with Iran not just by Germany. The WMD line used against Saddam was true... Call it an inconvenient truth.

Did you forget that some of those weapons were supplied by the west?

Or, perhaps you forgot that the US intelligence supplied targeting information for some of Saddam's chemical attacks on Iran? (FACT).

Or, perhaps you forgot that many Western countries have vast supplies of various WMD's, from chemical weapons to biological to nuclear?

Or?

What does it take for a westerner to have such loss of perspective?

originally posted by: Quetzalcoatl14

originally posted by: 727Sky
Poison gas was supplied to Iraq during the war with Iran not just by Germany. The WMD line used against Saddam was true... Call it an inconvenient truth.

Did you forget that some of those weapons were supplied by the west?

Or, perhaps you forgot that the US intelligence supplied targeting information for some of Saddam's chemical attacks on Iran? (FACT).

Or, perhaps you forgot that many Western countries have vast supplies of various WMD's, from chemical weapons to biological to nuclear?

Or?

What does it take for a westerner to have such loss of perspective?

Did you wake up on the wrong side of the bed today ? As per my comment ( I even did a thread a couple of months ago about WMD being supplied by the WEST or whatever you want to call the suppliers..)

So you might want to read the reply again ... or if you are wanting a verbal fight it ain't worth it to me; you win, believe whatever you want.

Plenty of articles about chemical weapons with "made in USA" and other Nato countries supplied to Iraq when Saddam was our buddy..

originally posted by: 727Sky

originally posted by: Quetzalcoatl14

originally posted by: 727Sky
Poison gas was supplied to Iraq during the war with Iran not just by Germany. The WMD line used against Saddam was true... Call it an inconvenient truth.

Did you forget that some of those weapons were supplied by the west?

Or, perhaps you forgot that the US intelligence supplied targeting information for some of Saddam's chemical attacks on Iran? (FACT).

Or, perhaps you forgot that many Western countries have vast supplies of various WMD's, from chemical weapons to biological to nuclear?

Or?

What does it take for a westerner to have such loss of perspective?

Did you wake up on the wrong side of the bed today ? As per my comment ( I even did a thread a couple of months ago about WMD being supplied by the WEST or whatever you want to call the suppliers..)

So you might want to read the reply again ... or if you are wanting a verbal fight it ain't worth it to me; you win, believe whatever you want.

Plenty of articles about chemical weapons with "made in USA" and other Nato countries supplied to Iraq when Saddam was our buddy..

Okay, my apologies. But if you were aware of all of this, I think that the statement the wmd charges against Saddam having validity basically negates the above points and others. Those charges can only exist really in a vacuum that ignores the history.

Again, please forgive me if I assumed. I'm too used to westerners being blind or hypocritical. I retract my statements.

originally posted by: ShadowLink
a reply to: KnightLight

Yeah sorry, I wasn't able to enlighten the thread with my insights cause I'm unable to watch the video right now.

Not that I am trying to stop you from posting, but in this case what is the point in posting?

originally posted by: _damon

Really though... I can't watch ATM, but am interested in at Least a brief synopsis, as is - if I'm not mistaken - part of the requirements of posting...

Perhaps someone other than the OP who can share a video link but can't type a paragraph; might offer Some idea of what we're looking at here?

Cool title but... That's just a picture of a guy in a YouTube frame to me until I get home.

Udo is right. There is propaganda.
Lets remember Russia Today is propaganda too.
The US secret services do try to influence journalists. So do the russians.
No lids blown here. Moving on.