Ebola, inside information

originally posted by: dasman888
a reply to: Xaphan

This little "BLEACH" meme gag?

It isn't funny at ALL. What it IS is irresponsible.

MODERATORS, PLEASE TAKE IT DOWN.

People who are afraid, sometimes do rash things... believing this horses**t might be one of them.

lol calm your boobs bro. I don't think anybody is dull enough to actually take this seriously. And if they are, well, that's Darwinism.

originally posted by: Xaphan

originally posted by: dasman888
a reply to: Xaphan

This little "BLEACH" meme gag?

It isn't funny at ALL. What it IS is irresponsible.

MODERATORS, PLEASE TAKE IT DOWN.

People who are afraid, sometimes do rash things... believing this horses**t might be one of them.

lol calm your boobs bro. I don't think anybody is dull enough to actually take this seriously. And if they are, well, that's Darwinism.

No, it's someone being a complete "idiot". Glad the post was removed.

I take a dim view of most officials these days - too much discredits them. I believe the "man on the street" first.

Sorry if this isn't a "direct" response to what you posted to begin the thread, but this relates to Ebola Coverup/Disinformation/possible weaponized virus testing (on Black people first, again - note the first victims, and the one who didn't get any experimental treatment in America were...Black, poor people.)

Here's more about the untold side of the Ebola terror story - and it is terror.

Here are some links that give other views not aired on Mainstream Media. Consider them for yourself before buying in to the official version told by CDC, WHO, etc. The DOD's own declassified documents (2009) implicate the US Government in witholding life saving information, and thus, treatment, from thousands of infected people. They KNOW nano silver is effective against ebola. They deny this and persecute those trying to spread the word. They even interfered with clinical trials in Liberia and Sierra Leone!

Ask the difficult questions: WHO does this serve? WHAT motivation would authorities have? WHY does the USA hold patents on ebola virus? HOW MUCH money is at stake in vaccines and drugs to "treat" the ebola virus? WHAT IF thousands of dead become millions? Is RACISM a motivation? COULD ebola have been bio-engineered as a weaponized virus?

Key points:
1) a patent on Ebola. www.google.com... (there are supposed to be at least 8 patents)

2) Dr Rima Laibow attacked by FDA over trying to spread word of nano silver efficacy on viruses including ebola - despite her proof that DOD has such knowledge. Her statements and petition, AND the FDA letter here: drrimatruthreports.com...

3) Video proving that nano silver was prevented by WHO from reaching patients in Sierra Leone and Liberia. World News broadcast. youtu.be...

4) WHO and CDC contradict themselves over Ebola means of spread - www.naturalnews.com...

5) Nano silver is NOT = to colloidal silver, or any other type. It is approved by CDC as a hospital disinfectant at 30ppm. DOD tests showed it inactivates ebola at a very safe 10ppm. - youtu.be...

6) There is NO plan from the officials that will help the Common Man. No one wants to be quarantined in a prison-like hospital to die. (no drugs for ebola, remember?) Here is #12 of a series on natural health, preparing for a pandemic: biodefense.com...

All this considered, and the fact that the BLACK Dallas patient wasn't even "tested" with the disputed nano silver protocol treatment (written for use in Liberia) , but allowed to die in the hospital - the WHITE doctors were given experimental treatments and lived - does anyone else smell a bunch of rats?

The protocol can be gotten from Dr Rima's site, under documents after her letter to the Sierra Leone president. The open letter: drrimatruthreports.com...

Clinical Trials NanoSilverProtocol.pdf (740K)
drrimatruthreports.com...

Worse - the "hospitals" the US military is setting up are surrounded by razor wire ...what the bleep is that about? Would they dare do that to Americans too? Google Liberia, military, and hospital prison camps...

Were the Georgia Guide Stones recently updated with the year 2014? (I'll let you Google that. DEF off-topic a bit.)

Shalom everyone! Hear all sides before making your opinion. Wishing you health, peace, and good life.

a reply to: OhioSnow

Now that was laying it on thick

I haven't had a chance to read all your links yet, but thank you for the information.

We need more of this...you're awesome

ETA
Have you purchased the Nano Silver for yourself and/or family. If so, how do you feel? I personally, stocked up on garcinia kola nuts and have started eating them. Are you familiar with the Garcinia Kola Nut (not to be confused with Garcinia Cambogia) and its medicinal properties?

a reply to: jadedANDcynical

It is this person's opinion that the virus is, and has been, transmissible prior to onset of symptoms.

Hell, I called that just as the CDC started saying that nonsense. That's like saying you cant get AIDS unless the person who has it looks like they are dying. We all know if it sounds fishy, then it is with anything coming out of this administration.

I foresee it going airborne in the not so distant future.

a reply to: Patriotsrevenge

I'm with you. The current Administration can't be trusted, the CDC can't be trusted, the WHO can't be trusted, the NIH, can't be trusted...etc. Heck, I don't trust the doctors either because I don't believe they are being properly informed.

Besides, the average doctor isn't trained to deal with something of this magnitude. That's what the CDC is for and what a lousy job they're underperforming.

originally posted by: tinkortwim
I foresee it going airborne in the not so distant future.

As far as I'm concerned....we're already there.

I am in the general Houston area so any more info you can find on cases here would be greatly appreciated.

a reply to: MKMoniker

(9/4/14) COULD BLOOD FROM EBOLA SURVIVORS HELP PATIENTS?

Absolutely, it shows what defeats the virus if they can track it down. They already have a cure. They cured the doctors who caught it and were given the experimental drug but they conveniently only had enough for them lol. They need time to patent it and pay off, opps I mean get it approved by the FDA.

Best thing to do is stay clear of anyone you do not know that is coughing or just looks sick. Take your vitamins and drink spring water!!!!! Make your body as healthy as it can be.

Your friend is wrong.

originally posted by: ThePublicEnemyNo1

originally posted by: tinkortwim
I foresee it going airborne in the not so distant future.

As far as I'm concerned....we're already there.

Ebola is too heavy to be airborne. It's a physical impossibility. It is just as likely that Ebola will mutate to become completely harmless.

originally posted by: RockerDom

originally posted by: ThePublicEnemyNo1

originally posted by: tinkortwim
I foresee it going airborne in the not so distant future.

As far as I'm concerned....we're already there.

Ebola is too heavy to be airborne. It's a physical impossibility. It is just as likely that Ebola will mutate to become completely harmless.

Ebola Reston went airborne. Your balloon just went down.

originally posted by: NoRulesAllowed
Also..the OP is confusing to me. I must be missing something or the OP edited something out since I don't see anything about "insider information about Ebola" in the OP.

Maybe read his subsequent posts.
He's said something we didn't know, and of course it's hearsay. That you can be contagious before showing any symptoms. That's pretty big! For example, if they are testing people at airports taking temps , watching for people who appear sick, and ONLY then do they get whisked away for isolation and further testing, it would mean they're missing those coming in who aren't yet showing symptoms and they're passing it around to others.

Only it's not and his friend is wrong. If that were true there would be planes of sick people. It's pretty easy to debunk the OP.

a reply to: violet

Ebola reston is a different virus and harmless to humans....Your balloon something something.

a reply to: Restricted

a reply to: raymundoko

Pretty easy to debunk your post:

Ebola virus is one of the most virulent pathogens, killing a very high proportion of patients within 5–7 days. Two outbreaks of fulminating haemorrhagic fever occurred in northern Gabon in 1996, with a 70% case-fatality rate. During both outbreaks we identified some individuals in direct contact with sick patients who never developed symptoms. We aimed to determine whether these individuals were indeed infected with Ebola virus, and how they maintained asymptomatic status.

This study showed that asymptomatic, replicative Ebola infection can and does occur in human beings. The lack of genetic differences between symptomatic and asymptomatic individuals suggest that asymptomatic Ebola infection did not result from viral mutations. Elucidation of the factors related to the genesis of the strong inflammatory response occurring early during the infectious process in these asymptomatic individuals could increase our understanding of the disease.

...

These findings show that some individuals were infected with the virus without developing symptoms. Results from previous outbreaks had only indicated that such an asymptomatic infection was possible.

Human asymptomatic Ebola infection and strong inflammatory response

If people can be asymptomatic, yet positive for the test, which looks for antibodies caused by the virus, and they can transmit the disease, why is to so hard to credit the idea that a person can transmit the disease prior to symptoms showing?



Granted, this is not likely to be a primary means of transmission.

Like the situation with canines, however, I would not want to take even the smallest chance of this going unchecked.

a reply to: jadedANDcynical

He looked at me with a somewhat blank look on his face, and then said, "not a bit." Granted he is a specialist in utritional health and food safety, but I (navely?) expected that all counties in Texas would provide any and all departments remotely related to health and safety updated information and protocols. Even just a bulletin or something. Nope.

My friend who just fled Dallas said this was exactly the attitude he saw when he questioned people there. He was astonished. He was in the public health field for many years and has sat on many, many "readiness" committees. Heck, he's chaired a bunch of those committees.
He says it was just about a month ago that a whole mess of CDC people were in the area for a "conference" that wasn't open to the public and wasn't reported on local media. He knew about it because he knew several of the people attending it. TB was the stated main focus of the meeting but there were extensive discussions of ebola as well. This was shortly after the first patient was brought to the US. That move was what got my friend interesting and investigating the issue.
At the time he assumed that the conference was about the influx of diseases coming across the border and was confused as to why ebola would have been considered.
According to his research, there are only 19 beds available in the entire US to properly contain this virus. Honestly contain it. That's why he and his are no longer in Dallas. He ran into entirely too many of those "blank stares" of which you spoke.
Today I delivered two quarts of ionic silver to his driveway along with nasal and oral spray bottles. I've not had a serious cold since I began using it several years ago so my money would be on using it as much as possible to kill all the nasties.
Maybe those of us who have been in the public health system see danger where the normal Joe on the street doesn't see it. We've been trained to have a "what if?" view of these dangers, making planning for "what if?"the next logical step in our thinking process. We're trained to look for the week links in the plan. When we see more weak links than strong ones we get really worried.
When we consider the fact that the contagion is up to 80% fatal, and we have no idea if the experimental treatments work or not---or whether the survivors would have survived the disease without the magic elixirs---too many weak links tell us to be safe rather than sorry.
Don't be surprised if you see an uptick in the "Help Wanted" ads for medical field employees in Dallas.

To those wondering about the human wastes being dumped--- I believe all municipal sewage treatment plants use chlorine in their treatments. Many use ozone as well. According to what I'm able to find out, chlorine is one of the surest ways of killing this bugger.

Please keeping offering prayers and sending lots of positive thoughts to all those dealing with this and feeling threatened by it.

originally posted by: RockerDom

originally posted by: ThePublicEnemyNo1

originally posted by: tinkortwim
I foresee it going airborne in the not so distant future.

As far as I'm concerned....we're already there.

Ebola is too heavy to be airborne. It's a physical impossibility. It is just as likely that Ebola will mutate to become completely harmless.

I hope and pray you are right.
However, I'm going to behave as though Tink is right.
If I can believe the published reports in official documents, one form has gone airborne in the past, just not the form that infects humans.

a reply to: canucks555
It's over 3000. , don't know exact figure but it is over that. I think what happened is they've said almost or approaching 3000, when its like 2600. Perhaps that's how you heard it?