It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
But I do notice anyone trying to buck against the accepted evidence of Christ's real existence want to drag any and all who don't agree into some "faith role".
AND I FOR ONE think the dude was most likely awesome. In fact, how many of you would face the law knowing it would kill you horrifically for your beliefs?
Go hate all you want...any "real school" will teach you that you are most likely wrong.
originally posted by: windword
Name calling and insults isn't going to make a mythical man more real. Have you studied the historicity of Jesus like I have? No? But you blindly believe what you told, and call those with valid evidence "quacks". How are you any different that any other Christian operating on faith? I'll tell you who the real quacks are!
There is NO evidence, outside the Bible, for the existence of one Jesus Christ, the man of myth. It bites, but it't true! Most real[/] scholars of history, anthropology and mythology agree, Jesus Christ was NOT a real person.
originally posted by: oletimer
a reply to: Spider879
Argumentum ad Ignorantiam: (appeal to ignorance) the fallacy that a proposition is true simply on the basis that it has not been proved false or that it is false simply because it has not been proved true. This error in reasoning is often expressed with influential rhetoric.
originally posted by: windword
So, yeah. Someone named Jesus existed. However, Jesus Christ, the mystical. magical man of myth NEVER EXISTED! Find me one scientist who can prove he did!
originally posted by: windword
a reply to: Mr Mask
Which is it? Jesus or Christ? You keep changing the goal posts, man.
originally posted by: windword
a reply to: Mr Mask
Look, you have talked about "Jesus" as being real. Then you say "Christ" was real, then you claim Jesus Christ was real.
Hate to break it to ya, but Jesus' last name wasn't Christ. They're 3 different entities/titles dude!
FACT: There were lots of men named Jesus around during the time period in question.
FACT: Josephus names more than a few Zealots named Jesus, but never Jesus of Nazareth or Jesus the son of Joseph.
FACT: Christ is a title that many men (and women) wore.
FACT: There is no evidence whatsoever that the magical, mythical god/man called Jesus Christ, with all his magical trappings ever existed! No historian or scientist, worth their salt, will admit otherwise.
2) The bible story of Jesus is most likely not accurate. Mostly due to magical things happening and people being the son of a deity....
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
a reply to: DeadSeraph
I'm going to split hairs here and say that while there really may have been a cult leader that Jesus is based on, the person described in the Bible definitely didn't exist. The person in the bible, in order to exist, has to have magical powers and be the son of god. This defies the laws of physics, and without any extra-biblical sources backing up this person's divinity, then it reasons that the person didn't exist. Though all of that doesn't mean that the person in the bible can't be based off of a real person. Though to try to say that they are the same person is dishonest. There are MANY fictional characters in fictional stories that are based on real people, that doesn't mean that the people in those stories exist as well, even if they share the same name.
originally posted by: windword
You can't have the Biblical Jesus Christ WITHOUT the magical trappings.
Further, biblical accounts of the life of Jesus Christ contradict each other. Many conflict with historic and scientific data.
If you want to believe in a magical Jesus Christ, be my guest, go right ahead. But religion, like Christianity and the belief in a magical Jesus Christ requires faith. If there were proof, then no faith would be required, and we'd all be Christians. But there isn't any proof.
He had a hallucinatory experience and became delusional. So what?
originally posted by: windword
You can't have the Biblical Jesus Christ WITHOUT the magical trappings.
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
a reply to: Mr Mask
Fair enough. But at what point do, after the collection of enough fictional stories, we stop calling the person a real person and instead a fake? What if everything written about Jesus is a lie, but he was still based on a real live cult leader? He just didn't do anything that was attributed to him in the bible, even the mundane things.