It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Salander
a reply to: samkent
And I should consider you an authority on this matter...why?
Hur kan det komma sig att 70 procent av nyinstallerade övervakningskameror fortfarande är analoga?
How can it be that 70 percent of newly installed surveillance cameras are still analogue? Read again: newly installed.
When the digital high-quality 1080p HDTV set against the old analog 50 Hz interlaced frames per second that gets people moving to flutter in still images (every other image, use every other line) and when the lives and property are at stake - the blurred flutter image wins seven times out of ten.
originally posted by: samkent
a reply to: Salander
And assuming they were functional, they would have clearly shown any targets crossing the yard. And if a 757 had flown across it would have been recorded, and the brass would have taken those tapes to thee 911 Commission to prove its story.
That is one assumption too far.
Back in the day not all cameras were recorded.
Back in the day recorders were essentially modified VCR's. Big and limited on inputs.
In my minds viewpoint they would have 1 maybe 2 cameras at each doorway to the building.
But were they recorded????
How many times have we discovered that high tech filters down throught the government at a snails pace?
Haven't you heard the stories of antique computers and software being main line devices?
The bull# concocted by the MSM and the government, through which you construct a certain reality. In short, the official narrative of the events of 11 September.