It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Salander
Well the Aerospace articles are interesting, though I've seen most of that before.
Trouble is, the writer does not report or document which pieces he examined, or where. IOW he's just writing about the technical aspects of various engines and such.
Trouble is, the stuff that is missing is far more important than the stuff that was there.
originally posted by: rickymouse
The biggest conspiracy about 911 is that some top officials of the trade center were informed there may be a possible event that day yet nobody else there was informed. The top brass were conveniently not there. I don't think the government agencies knew how it was going to happen though. It seems this was a case of them watching these guys trying to get a big bust and allowing something to happen because they did not pick them up. This kind of action caused an event that actually made us want the agencies services more instead of us saying, why did you let this happen in the first place.
That is the biggest problem, the intelligence agencies could have stopped 911 from happening yet they got rewarded for letting it happen instead by increased funding.
Now, I am not sure the source I read on this was legit, it was a news story, but it seems that it could be possible. They did supposedly change the normal protocol on this afterwards though, so this probably won't happen again. If it was normal procedure at the time, no crime was committed either. It was just a flaw in the system. They used to do stuff like this a lot to find the ones controlling things, but in this case everything went wrong.
originally posted by: waypastvne
originally posted by: mortex
Do you think it was also a coincidence that less then 24 hours after the attacks that bombs were falling on Afghanistan?
You might want to double check that fact.
originally posted by: mortex
-Planes hit the towers.
-There's been a war on a global scale fought since then.
That's probably the only 2 undeniable facts we can all agree on.
originally posted by: lexyghot
a reply to: mortex
Wow.
Bush tried to get the Taliban to hand over Bin Laden, but they refused.
The first airstrikes were on October 7.
So it was about 3 1/2 weeks after 9/11.
Can't you truthers get anything correct?
originally posted by: mortex
Afghanistan and bin Laden were identified immediately on the day.
originally posted by: lexyghot
originally posted by: mortex
I don't care when you say the first strikes officially started..
You don't have to take my word for it.
There's this thing called the internet. You can access a thing called google there, they have lots of info.
You should try it.
originally posted by: waypastvne
originally posted by: mortex
Afghanistan and bin Laden were identified immediately on the day.
Bin Laden had been telling us he was going to attack us years before 911. We all knew it would eventually happen.
When i got a phone call that morning telling me to turn on the TV a plane had just crashed into the WTC, The first words out of my mouth,before i turned on the TV, were SH*T ... BIN LADEN!
Yes I knew about poppies in Afghanistan well before 911.
originally posted by: waypastvne
a reply to: mortex
Right now today, ISIS is telling us they plan to blow up 5 commercial aircraft before Christmas.
originally posted by: mortex
I don't care when you say the first strikes officially started. The media coverage from the USA on the day clearly stated it.
I'm not saying air strikes 100%, but someone be it in a plane or special forces or tomahawk missiles, was blowing something up that same day in Afghanistan.[/.quote]
Then show us evidence of that....