It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
You just make yourself look worse and worse. From that link you can easily find:
Yep, I just checked, it is categorized as "Active Shooter" and shows up on a separate report with 27 deaths
You are being willfully ignorant.
The reports listed below were not authored by the FBI, but links to the reports are being provided for general public information.
Washington, D.C. Navy Yard shootings, 9/16/13
Internal Review of the Washington Navy Yard Shooting: A Report to the Secretary of Defense, Department of Defense
Sandy Hook Elementary School shootings, Newtown, Connecticut, 12/13/12
Sandy Hook Elementary School Shootings Reports, Connecticut State Police
Columbine (Colorado) High School shootings, 4/20/1999
The Report of Governor Bill Owens’ Columbine Review Commission
Jesus AntiDude, I can't tell if you are a troll at this point. I don't know how better to explain it. You ask why the FBI didn't report it? They did:
So then why are you freaking out that the state police numbers are not listed under the local police reports? For #s sake, man.
Yes, it is a chart of what arrests were made by the Newtown police department. This number, while related to what crimes were actually committed, is completely irrelevant. If they arrested somebody who murdered somebody 2 years earlier, the murder would show up 2 years ago on the crime stat, but the arrest would not show up until the current year.
So it's obvious you just are a bit slow in picking things up. My links were to show that the FBI categorizes these events as active shooter/mass casualty and not as violent crimes.
I'm explaining WHY it shows zero. It wasn't handled by local authorities and isn't classified as a violent crime, but as an active shooter/mass casualty incident.
your explanation does not make sense because adults died in Sandy Hook as well. Why would 0 deaths be reported then? adults are not juveniles. The shooter killed his mother, along with at least one female teacher and the principal, all over the age of 18, therefore not considered juveniles.why is there no record of these adult deaths then?
originally posted by: Helious
It's not a mistake, the FBI has stated that "local" law enforcement officials asked that they not be included.
It's kind of like how none of them have death certificates because the law was changed a year earlier at the behest of Wayne Carvers administration so that no juvenile death records could ever be visible to the public.
It's kind of like how they pummeled the entire school, sent all the remnants to China and made the company that did the demo sign non disclosure agreements.
It's kind of like a bunch of complete BS.
I'm right because I'm right. The facts say so.
No dead children at Sandy Hook = a lie. Period.
originally posted by: Aloysius the Gaul
The cognitive dissonance on here is pretty awesome - the simple explanation has been given - the page posted lists only those crimes accounted for in the LOCAL POLICE stats. the Sandyhook killings are accounted for in the STATE POLICE stats.
It even says so on the actual UCR report if anyone had bothered to look past the sensational headlines:
Why, you may wonder? The case was handled start to finish by the state police, NOT Newtown's local police force. This means that Newtown did not report the murders in their Uniform Crime Report, but rather the state reported it.
originally posted by: tavi45
It's all meaningless. Best evidence of conspiracy is that they demolished the scene of the crime nearly overnight.