It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Zaphod58
a reply to: KnightLight
despite the F-22 not being equipped with an electrooptical system
Don't know if you or neuman have been to Russia and spoken to some military brass there and seen some things.
originally posted by: nwtrucker
a reply to: Nochzwei
To quote Alfred E Neuman, "What, me worry?"
There's enough 'possibles' out there to stew about. I don't bother with them. It's not worth the effort..
originally posted by: Nochzwei
What will we do if their famous line 'We'll send the entire west to your god moloch in 15 minutes ', is not a hollow claim and actually launch it? Would there be any time to react? I think not
…but all F-14A and F-14B airframes had already been retired, and the last two squadrons, the VF-31 Tomcatters and the VF-213 Black Lions, both flying the "D" models, arrived for their last fly-in at Naval Air Station Oceana on 10 March 2006.
---
The last American F-14 to fly a combat mission, an F-14D from VF-213, lands at Sherman Field at Naval Air Station Pensacola, Florida.The last American F-14 combat mission was completed on 8 February 2006, when a pair of Tomcats landed aboard the USS Theodore Roosevelt after one dropped a bomb in Iraq.
last Tomcats retired
originally posted by: LDragonFire
Isn't the F-22 a major piece of crap? Pilots are afraid or refuse to fly it? They have cost like 3 or 4 times the original cost? They entered service in 2005 yet they just now enter combat? Haven't these planes spent most of there service time grounded?
Are they a lemon?
(tiger tank)--Overly complex, expensive, heavy, slow, unreliable, poor in snow and mud come to mind.
19Apr 1945, Bollersdorf (Germany): 4 Tiger 2 attacked and destroyed 120 T-34-85 and JS-2’s, at ranges of 1,5 – 3km. The battle raged for a few hours, with about 30 T-34s destroyed during the night. (All tank commanders were given the Knight Cross on the 28th of April)
• 20Apr 1945, Klostendorf, Germany: 1 Tiger 2 of the SS-103rd Panzer destroyed 13 soviet tanks at ranges of 2-4km.
---
For instance, on the 12th of July 1943, 6 Tigers of the 504th heavy tank battalion launched a counter-attack in Italy, towards Vittoria. They were met by 40-50 US tanks and surrounded. In the fierce battle that followed, 16 US tanks were knocked-out (10 burned), and 3 Tigers lost on the battlefield. The other 3 Tigers got away, although each suffered over 100 hits !
Link
originally posted by: nwtrucker
Between Bush Presidencies, we shrunk over 50% in size militarily. That shrinking continues. Massive social spending increases have contributed to that.
It's a balancing act with a lot of gray areas.
Neither was the F18 originally designed to be a strike fighter.
the Navy wanted a replacement for the TomCat, Corsair and Intruder.
No I did not mean nuclear or chemical at all. Rather not elaborate any more.
originally posted by: JimTSpock
originally posted by: Nochzwei
What will we do if their famous line 'We'll send the entire west to your god moloch in 15 minutes ', is not a hollow claim and actually launch it? Would there be any time to react? I think not
Do you mean Russia's nuclear arsenal? America has one too. If either side tried to use it on the other it would result in MAD and probably irradiate the whole world, so it's all academic really. It doesn't really matter who's got what they can destroy each other with nuclear weapons no problem at all. SLBMs with MIRVs on both sides can still launch even if their side has been hit.
originally posted by: Sammamishman
originally posted by: bigx001
we really don't know what the military/NSA/CIA really have as operational aircraft. and they don't sit still with development
Which is why I don't think it was the -170 as the -170 was supposedly a stop gap measure till the -180's got going. I don't believe the -170 has the loiter time or the survivability in an unknown air defense arena for that amount of time and is older tech than the -180.
originally posted by: bigx001
originally posted by: Sammamishman
originally posted by: bigx001
we really don't know what the military/NSA/CIA really have as operational aircraft. and they don't sit still with development
Which is why I don't think it was the -170 as the -170 was supposedly a stop gap measure till the -180's got going. I don't believe the -170 has the loiter time or the survivability in an unknown air defense arena for that amount of time and is older tech than the -180.
you can guesstimate a few things. loiter time means relatively slow to reduce fuel burn. the longer you loiter the more fuel you need. bigger and longerwings give you more storage for fuel as does shape of the body.
so you can get an idea of what something that will loiter for a long time could look like