It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Evidence of demolition company at 9/11

page: 3
46
<< 1  2    4  5  6 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Sep, 21 2014 @ 09:28 PM
link   

originally posted by: hellobruce

originally posted by: Emerys
I guess my line of thought was how odd it was that all of this demo equipment was already on site.


Exactly what demo equipment was already onsite? If you watched the video you would see hoardings behind the bins...


If the demolition company had their trash bins there, you cannot prove nor I that there was or wasn't any other equipment. Also check out all this equipment that rolled in that afternoon. Just seems too coordinated..





posted on Sep, 21 2014 @ 09:28 PM
link   

originally posted by: AlphaHawk
Just a thought..

Why did they decide to demolish wt7 7 hours after the first tower collapsed? Or 6 1/2 hours after the second tower, the one that damaged wt7?

Why didn't they drop it while there was a huge cloud of dust billowing out? When no one would have seen it come down..

No, instead they waited until late afternoon to do it...




Because the plane that was intended on crashing into WTC 7 didn't make it to it's mark. It was brought down in Shanksfield, Penn.

They had to still "Pull" the building to complete the plan.



posted on Sep, 21 2014 @ 09:34 PM
link   

originally posted by: Emerys

originally posted by: hellobruce

originally posted by: Emerys
I guess my line of thought was how odd it was that all of this demo equipment was already on site.


Exactly what demo equipment was already onsite? If you watched the video you would see hoardings behind the bins...


If the demolition company had their trash bins there, you cannot prove nor I that there was or wasn't any other equipment. Also check out all this equipment that rolled in that afternoon. Just seems too coordinated..



What the video you posted shows is how little regard there was towards any investigation into what happened. Clean it off the streets so everyone can get back to work, shows over.



posted on Sep, 21 2014 @ 09:35 PM
link   

originally posted by: MALBOSIA

originally posted by: Answer

originally posted by: EartOccupant
a reply to: Bilk22


Don't forget there is also a video around with fire fighters telling people in advance building 7 is coming down and they need to clear the area.

I try finding it:

This is not the one, but also they know it in advance:



Another:



Firefighters were reporting over the radio that the structure was starting to fail. They saw parts of the building starting to bulge and crumple. After the towers collapsed, they obviously weren't taking any chances.

EDIT: I see this was already addressed earlier in the thread and the typical truther responses have already been posted. Predictable.


I didn't hear anything in those reports that said the fire fighters reported seeing bulging. Not in the 2 videos you quoted.
I have read those claims about the "bulge" but have yet to see anyone on a video say it.

Notice that the Marriot didn't collapse even after a 110 story building fell on it.



posted on Sep, 21 2014 @ 09:39 PM
link   

originally posted by: MALBOSIA

originally posted by: Emerys

originally posted by: hellobruce

originally posted by: Emerys
I guess my line of thought was how odd it was that all of this demo equipment was already on site.


Well, you're partly correct. But shouldn't the site have been left untouched? It's a criminal investigation, not a demo clean up!? Right?
Exactly what demo equipment was already onsite? If you watched the video you would see hoardings behind the bins...


If the demolition company had their trash bins there, you cannot prove nor I that there was or wasn't any other equipment. Also check out all this equipment that rolled in that afternoon. Just seems too coordinated..



What the video you posted shows is how little regard there was towards any investigation into what happened. Clean it off the streets so everyone can get back to work, shows over.


What this video shows is the methodical strategy to clean this mess up, before anyone can question it.
edit on 21-9-2014 by Emerys because: (no reason given)



posted on Sep, 21 2014 @ 09:47 PM
link   

originally posted by: Bilk22

originally posted by: MALBOSIA

originally posted by: Answer

originally posted by: EartOccupant
a reply to: Bilk22


Don't forget there is also a video around with fire fighters telling people in advance building 7 is coming down and they need to clear the area.

I try finding it:

This is not the one, but also they know it in advance:



Another:



Firefighters were reporting over the radio that the structure was starting to fail. They saw parts of the building starting to bulge and crumple. After the towers collapsed, they obviously weren't taking any chances.

EDIT: I see this was already addressed earlier in the thread and the typical truther responses have already been posted. Predictable.


I didn't hear anything in those reports that said the fire fighters reported seeing bulging. Not in the 2 videos you quoted.
I have read those claims about the "bulge" but have yet to see anyone on a video say it.

Notice that the Marriot didn't collapse even after a 110 story building fell on it.


I can comprehend how the Marriott sustained the damage and I can comprehend how what was left of it was relatively stable. It is mind boggling to try and comprehend WTC 1 ,2 and 7 collapses. It defies all logic.



posted on Sep, 21 2014 @ 09:50 PM
link   

originally posted by: MALBOSIA
a reply to: AlphaHawk

I bet the Marriott was going to collapse. Look where it was...





and look at the damage it sustained...



They were worried that what little was left of the Marriott would collapse. Not sure what tipped them off about building 7.






dont you know u cant compare any buildings to anyother buildings on 9/11?

they are all separate but equal

the fact they all fell the same way and that this has neither happened before or since is simply your imagination

ask any oser

(/sarcasm off)



posted on Sep, 21 2014 @ 09:53 PM
link   

originally posted by: MALBOSIA

originally posted by: Bilk22

originally posted by: MALBOSIA

originally posted by: Answer

originally posted by: EartOccupant
a reply to: Bilk22


Don't forget there is also a video around with fire fighters telling people in advance building 7 is coming down and they need to clear the area.

I try finding it:

This is not the one, but also they know it in advance:



Another:



Firefighters were reporting over the radio that the structure was starting to fail. They saw parts of the building starting to bulge and crumple. After the towers collapsed, they obviously weren't taking any chances.

EDIT: I see this was already addressed earlier in the thread and the typical truther responses have already been posted. Predictable.


I didn't hear anything in those reports that said the fire fighters reported seeing bulging. Not in the 2 videos you quoted.
I have read those claims about the "bulge" but have yet to see anyone on a video say it.

Notice that the Marriot didn't collapse even after a 110 story building fell on it.


I can comprehend how the Marriott sustained the damage and I can comprehend how what was left of it was relatively stable. It is mind boggling to try and comprehend WTC 1 ,2 and 7 collapses. It defies all logic.
Yup. 7 is obviously the smoking gun that no one wants to address. Well the smoking gun that our Washington overlords don't want to address.

They destroyed all the evidence by sending it to China so it could then be sold back to us in trinkets. Pretty evil, if you ask me. May they all rot in hell.
edit on 16254Sundayk22 by Bilk22 because: (no reason given)



posted on Sep, 21 2014 @ 10:05 PM
link   
This particular company does NOT do explosive demolitions. They are contractors that have a demolition crew for preconstruction work.
I even used them years ago, if I can remember correctly, for a Pay Less Shoe Store on Canal Street.
If you don't believe me look up their licensing or simply just call them, their in the book. I'm sure they love the publicity and the laugh.

As for #7 it was still demolished by a professional crew IMO, but I'm not going to argue that here.



posted on Sep, 21 2014 @ 10:33 PM
link   
To fully Understand

One Should Look how these Building How they were Built WTC 1 & 2 and WTC 7

The Construction ( The Steps ) Design etc..

Then How it was Design for a 707 Airliner to Plow Through it Like a Pencil going through a Metal mesh Screen


Exterior Steel Columns

Exterior steel columns being built during construction of the Twin Towers Port Authority of New York and New Jersey Exterior steel columns being built during construction of the Twin Towers The solution, developed by the structural engineers John Skilling and Leslie Robertson in the mid-1960s, was to re-conceive the basic structure of tall buildings. At the World Trade Center, a super-strong lattice of exterior steel columns, placed less than two feet apart and locked tightly together at every floor, would transform each tower into a giant "tube." The remarkably stiff outer structure could readily resist the force of 150-mile-per-hour winds -- far higher than any ever recorded in the region. For almost the first time in the century-long history of skyscrapers, the exterior wall was returned to structural duty.

www.pbs.org...

The WTC 7 is Loss for Words at his Point..

From Where I Am From

Steel Workers that Help Build the World Trade Centers... From The Reservations of the Mohawk Community from Canada and The United States around the St Lawrence Seaway That I talked to have Said have said there is No Way they Could Free Fall practically into it own footprint that Fast from the way they were Built ! One Said to me that They can withstand Natural Disasters .. I asked what he Meant He said High Storms , and High Richter Scale Earth Quakes .. and A..... Long.... Pause... 707 Airliner Plowing through it ! as He Said ... That I never forgot

Also one Should See what these Native American Steel Workers that Worked on The World Trade Centers have Said..

Teamwork at the Ground Zero Cleanup
An Interview With a Mohawk Ironworker on Teamwork During WTC Cleanup
asq.org...







edit on 21-9-2014 by Wolfenz because: (no reason given)



posted on Sep, 21 2014 @ 10:54 PM
link   

originally posted by: Wolfenz
there is No Way they Could Free Fall practically into it own footprint


None of the collapsed buildings on 9/11 fell into their own footprint - how do you think all the other buildings there were damaged? Neither WTC 1 or 2 fell at free fall speed. Just watch them collapse you can clearly see that!



posted on Sep, 21 2014 @ 11:03 PM
link   

originally posted by: MALBOSIA

originally posted by: Answer

originally posted by: EartOccupant
a reply to: Bilk22


Don't forget there is also a video around with fire fighters telling people in advance building 7 is coming down and they need to clear the area.

I try finding it:

This is not the one, but also they know it in advance:



Another:



Firefighters were reporting over the radio that the structure was starting to fail. They saw parts of the building starting to bulge and crumple. After the towers collapsed, they obviously weren't taking any chances.

EDIT: I see this was already addressed earlier in the thread and the typical truther responses have already been posted. Predictable.


I didn't hear anything in those reports that said the fire fighters reported seeing bulging. Not in the 2 videos you quoted.


What are you talking about? I was responding to the claims made in the post. I was not commenting on those particular videos.

Do some basic research on the WTC 7 collapse... even Wiki talks about the radio traffic from police and firefighters saying parts of the building were collapsing and the entire structure seemed compromised. That's why they stopped fighting the fire and moved everyone away from the building.



posted on Sep, 21 2014 @ 11:10 PM
link   

originally posted by: hellobruce

originally posted by: Wolfenz
there is No Way they Could Free Fall practically into it own footprint


None of the collapsed buildings on 9/11 fell into their own footprint - how do you think all the other buildings there were damaged? Neither WTC 1 or 2 fell at free fall speed. Just watch them collapse you can clearly see that!


Truthers see what they want to see in those videos. Every single one of these threads prove that they are more than willing to apply their own bias to the facts and ignore logical explanations. They WANT the demolition story to be true so badly that they attack any evidence that contradicts their fairy tale. These threads are as pointless as the Creation vs Evolution threads. Anyone who disagrees with the explosive demolition story is just "buying the official story." The irony is that the truthers buy the conspiracy story without any evidence. It's true because they want it to be. Did the government have a hand in the 9/11 attack? Probably. Did they plant explosives to make the buildings collapse? There's no evidence that points to yes.



posted on Sep, 21 2014 @ 11:17 PM
link   

originally posted by: Answer

originally posted by: hellobruce

originally posted by: Wolfenz
there is No Way they Could Free Fall practically into it own footprint


None of the collapsed buildings on 9/11 fell into their own footprint - how do you think all the other buildings there were damaged? Neither WTC 1 or 2 fell at free fall speed. Just watch them collapse you can clearly see that!


Truthers see what they want to see in those videos. Every single one of these threads prove that they are more than willing to apply their own bias to the facts and ignore logical explanations. They WANT the demolition story to be true so badly that they attack any evidence that contradicts their fairy tale. These threads are as pointless as the Creation vs Evolution threads. Anyone who disagrees with the explosive demolition story is just "buying the official story." The irony is that the truthers buy the conspiracy story without any evidence. It's true because they want it to be. Did the government have a hand in the 9/11 attack? Probably. Did they plant explosives to make the buildings collapse? There's no evidence that points to yes.
So how did the government have a hand in the attacks? Have support for those words?



posted on Sep, 21 2014 @ 11:25 PM
link   

originally posted by: AlphaHawk
Just a thought..

Why did they decide to demolish wt7 7 hours after the first tower collapsed? Or 6 1/2 hours after the second tower, the one that damaged wt7?

Why didn't they drop it while there was a huge cloud of dust billowing out? When no one would have seen it come down..

No, instead they waited until late afternoon to do it...




Perhaps you should read the HARBINGER, by Rabbi Jonathan Cahn.

Or watch some of his videos regarding the Number 7.

Seven hours after first tower collapses building SEVEN collapses.

Seven Years, Seven Days, Seven Hours and Seven Minutes after that the stock markets implode, just as they did following Nine Eleven.

This all has to do with GODS PLAN....

SHEMITAH, the 7 year cycle where they get bailed out time and time again, at the expense of the Ungodly, ring around the ROSY.



posted on Sep, 21 2014 @ 11:31 PM
link   

originally posted by: Bilk22

originally posted by: Answer

originally posted by: hellobruce

originally posted by: Wolfenz
there is No Way they Could Free Fall practically into it own footprint


None of the collapsed buildings on 9/11 fell into their own footprint - how do you think all the other buildings there were damaged? Neither WTC 1 or 2 fell at free fall speed. Just watch them collapse you can clearly see that!


Truthers see what they want to see in those videos. Every single one of these threads prove that they are more than willing to apply their own bias to the facts and ignore logical explanations. They WANT the demolition story to be true so badly that they attack any evidence that contradicts their fairy tale. These threads are as pointless as the Creation vs Evolution threads. Anyone who disagrees with the explosive demolition story is just "buying the official story." The irony is that the truthers buy the conspiracy story without any evidence. It's true because they want it to be. Did the government have a hand in the 9/11 attack? Probably. Did they plant explosives to make the buildings collapse? There's no evidence that points to yes.
So how did the government have a hand in the attacks? Have support for those words?


I look at the events leading up to the attack, the formation of Al Qaeda, the players involved, what happened after the attack, and who profited from the aftermath. This is why I said "probably."

If there weren't high-level people within "TPTB" involved, they definitely used the attack to their advantage after the fact and continue to do so through the perpetual "war on terror."
edit on 9/21/2014 by Answer because: (no reason given)



posted on Sep, 21 2014 @ 11:35 PM
link   

originally posted by: Bilk22

originally posted by: MALBOSIA

originally posted by: Answer

originally posted by: EartOccupant
a reply to: Bilk22


Don't forget there is also a video around with fire fighters telling people in advance building 7 is coming down and they need to clear the area.

I try finding it:

This is not the one, but also they know it in advance:



Another:



Firefighters were reporting over the radio that the structure was starting to fail. They saw parts of the building starting to bulge and crumple. After the towers collapsed, they obviously weren't taking any chances.

EDIT: I see this was already addressed earlier in the thread and the typical truther responses have already been posted. Predictable.


I didn't hear anything in those reports that said the fire fighters reported seeing bulging. Not in the 2 videos you quoted.
I have read those claims about the "bulge" but have yet to see anyone on a video say it.

Notice that the Marriot didn't collapse even after a 110 story building fell on it.


Also notice how no Raging Fires occurred there, even though it was far closer to any of the Whitehot Debris that somehow found its way magically through the walls that were intact to start fires over there.

Burn down the Altar once the 2 Pillars are burnt.



posted on Sep, 21 2014 @ 11:43 PM
link   
a reply to: Answer


Problem is, there IS no contradictory evidence towards the TRUTHERS.

It is so far beyond laughable the efforts the pathetic scientists made trying to fit this into the marred paradigm of the world they were programmed with, it blows the mind.

How do you figure any of the conclusions the MEDIA came up with have anything to do with the truth, and how do you reconcile the fact that no real scientific investigation was ever done on this, but bottled up into segments filled with people who were ready to change REALITY to fit the absolute destruction seen here.

Some serious revelations are coming to those whom are so easily fooled.



posted on Sep, 21 2014 @ 11:43 PM
link   

originally posted by: ParasuvO

originally posted by: AlphaHawk
Just a thought..

Why did they decide to demolish wt7 7 hours after the first tower collapsed? Or 6 1/2 hours after the second tower, the one that damaged wt7?

Why didn't they drop it while there was a huge cloud of dust billowing out? When no one would have seen it come down..

No, instead they waited until late afternoon to do it...




Perhaps you should read the HARBINGER, by Rabbi Jonathan Cahn.

Or watch some of his videos regarding the Number 7.

Seven hours after first tower collapses building SEVEN collapses.

Seven Years, Seven Days, Seven Hours and Seven Minutes after that the stock markets implode, just as they did following Nine Eleven.

This all has to do with GODS PLAN....

SHEMITAH, the 7 year cycle where they get bailed out time and time again, at the expense of the Ungodly, ring around the ROSY.
The stock market crash happened September 29, 2008. That doesn't align with the 7/7/7/7 you referred to. ?



posted on Sep, 21 2014 @ 11:53 PM
link   

originally posted by: ParasuvO
a reply to: Answer


Problem is, there IS no contradictory evidence towards the TRUTHERS.

It is so far beyond laughable the efforts the pathetic scientists made trying to fit this into the marred paradigm of the world they were programmed with, it blows the mind.

How do you figure any of the conclusions the MEDIA came up with have anything to do with the truth, and how do you reconcile the fact that no real scientific investigation was ever done on this, but bottled up into segments filled with people who were ready to change REALITY to fit the absolute destruction seen here.

Some serious revelations are coming to those whom are so easily fooled.



Again, you're applying your own bias to the situation. A thorough investigation was done and the causes of the collapses were documented. You just don't want to believe the evidence presented. You're EXACTLY like a creationist who denies the evidence of evolution because "the scientists are just trying to make the evidence fit what they already believe!" The parallels are interesting and I think it paints a clear picture of denial.

Not one single piece of evidence has been presented by the truthers that holds up to the slightest degree of scrutiny. In the 13 years since the attack, the truther movement hasn't come up with anything solid. They keep presenting the same bogus opinions of a small handful of "experts" with questionable or non-existent qualifications. It makes as much sense as moon-landing deniers who say it didn't happen because "I just don't think it's possible." An individual's uneducated and uninformed opinion does not a reality make.
edit on 9/21/2014 by Answer because: (no reason given)



new topics

top topics



 
46
<< 1  2    4  5  6 >>

log in

join