It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Evidence of demolition company at 9/11

page: 2
46
<< 1    3  4  5 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Sep, 21 2014 @ 07:15 PM
link   
a reply to: Bilk22

Well you started off on the right track, when you said..



what time was it when this video footage was taken? So who told this cop in advance it was going to collapse?


But then you started jumping to conclusions without bothering to try and answer your own questions. If this was filmed around 2pm, then it was the fire department that told him, on one of those fancy things called a radio no doubt..

But we don't know the time, so we should all do what you do and just ignore that and jump to conclusions to confirm an already biased bias..




posted on Sep, 21 2014 @ 07:22 PM
link   

originally posted by: AlphaHawk
a reply to: Bilk22

Well you started off on the right track, when you said..



what time was it when this video footage was taken? So who told this cop in advance it was going to collapse?


But then you started jumping to conclusions without bothering to try and answer your own questions. If this was filmed around 2pm, then it was the fire department that told him, on one of those fancy things called a radio no doubt..

But we don't know the time, so we should all do what you do and just ignore that and jump to conclusions to confirm an already biased bias..
And how did the fire department know? There was no prior experience with a fire causing a steel superstructure building to collapse. None. Not anywhere in the world. It was just a fire. We've seen the videos of other towers burning like roman candles and they didn't collapse.

So how would the fire department know this was going to happen, and with the latest video posted, they seemed to know just exactly when that would occur. heck, they didn't even say, "it may collapse". They said definitively it would.
edit on 05722Sundayk22 by Bilk22 because: (no reason given)



posted on Sep, 21 2014 @ 07:23 PM
link   
Just a thought..

Why did they decide to demolish wt7 7 hours after the first tower collapsed? Or 6 1/2 hours after the second tower, the one that damaged wt7?

Why didn't they drop it while there was a huge cloud of dust billowing out? When no one would have seen it come down..

No, instead they waited until late afternoon to do it...



posted on Sep, 21 2014 @ 07:34 PM
link   

originally posted by: AlphaHawk
Just a thought..

Why did they decide to demolish wt7 7 hours after the first tower collapsed? Or 6 1/2 hours after the second tower, the one that damaged wt7?

Why didn't they drop it while there was a huge cloud of dust billowing out? When no one would have seen it come down..

No, instead they waited until late afternoon to do it...


That I cannot answer. We know the CIA, FBI, Secret Service and other agencies were located in 7. Solomon Brothers as well Drexel Burnham were there also. What else was located inside that structure? Who knows?



posted on Sep, 21 2014 @ 07:35 PM
link   
a reply to: Bilk22

So you missed the reports of the bulge spotted between floors 10-13 then?

They even thought the Marriott was going to collapse.


There were a lot of damaged apparatus there that were covered. We tried to get searches in those areas. By now, this is going on into the afternoon, and we were concerned about additional collapse, not only of the Marriott, because there was a good portion of the Marriott still standing, but also we were pretty sure that 7 World Trade Center would collapse. Early on, we saw a bulge in the southwest corner between floors 10 and 13, and we had put a transit on that and we were pretty sure she was going to collapse. You actually could see there was a visible bulge, it ran up about three floors. It came down about 5 o’clock in the afternoon, but by about 2 o’clock in the afternoon we realized this thing was going to collapse.

Firehouse: Was there heavy fire in there right away?

Hayden: No, not right away, and that’s probably why it stood for so long because it took a while for that fire to develop. It was a heavy body of fire in there and then we didn’t make any attempt to fight it. That was just one of those wars we were just going to lose. We were concerned about the collapse of a 47-story building there. We were worried about additional collapse there of what was remaining standing of the towers and the Marriott, so we started pulling the people back after a couple of hours of surface removal and searches along the surface of the debris. We started to pull guys back because we were concerned for their safety.


www.firehouse.com...


edit on 21-9-2014 by AlphaHawk because: (no reason given)



posted on Sep, 21 2014 @ 07:36 PM
link   
Construction and demolition companies are where most
boogeymen thrive,
from Mobster to Bechtel .



posted on Sep, 21 2014 @ 07:39 PM
link   

originally posted by: Emerys
Hello,

I was on the YouTube looking at videos today and came across one with "new" footage. If you go to 10:02, you will see some large metal trash cans. One of them is labeled Tyrones Demolition. Now, I am not stating that this company was involved in the collapse of the towers, I do however, find it interesting that it's there at all. It shows that a demolition company was on site the day of 9/11. I will let the discussion begin.



Those cans could be used for regular demo. They are on wheels and can fit in elevators. They are used to scrap out walls and mechanical before a renovation or new tenant improvements.


+8 more 
posted on Sep, 21 2014 @ 07:41 PM
link   

originally posted by: AlphaHawk
Just a thought..

Why did they decide to demolish wt7 7 hours after the first tower collapsed? Or 6 1/2 hours after the second tower, the one that damaged wt7?

Why didn't they drop it while there was a huge cloud of dust billowing out? When no one would have seen it come down..

No, instead they waited until late afternoon to do it...




Perhaps in WTC 7 was the staging and command center for the bewilderingly complex operation on 9/11.
It was destroyed to eliminate remaining evidence, after the event was completed.
edit on 21-9-2014 by ecapsretuo because: (no reason given)



posted on Sep, 21 2014 @ 07:42 PM
link   

originally posted by: Bilk22

originally posted by: AlphaHawk
Just a thought..

Why did they decide to demolish wt7 7 hours after the first tower collapsed? Or 6 1/2 hours after the second tower, the one that damaged wt7?

Why didn't they drop it while there was a huge cloud of dust billowing out? When no one would have seen it come down..

No, instead they waited until late afternoon to do it...


That I cannot answer. We know the CIA, FBI, Secret Service and other agencies were located in 7. Solomon Brothers as well Drexel Burnham were there also. What else was located inside that structure? Who knows?

Sometimes plans don't always go smoothly.
Sometimes transmitters and receivers fail. Then I suspect
it becomes a sudden blitz to trouble shoot and get equipment
swapped. I mean if I were to guess.



posted on Sep, 21 2014 @ 07:55 PM
link   

originally posted by: AlphaHawk
a reply to: Bilk22

So you missed the reports of the bulge spotted between floors 10-13 then?

They even thought the Marriott was going to collapse.


There were a lot of damaged apparatus there that were covered. We tried to get searches in those areas. By now, this is going on into the afternoon, and we were concerned about additional collapse, not only of the Marriott, because there was a good portion of the Marriott still standing, but also we were pretty sure that 7 World Trade Center would collapse. Early on, we saw a bulge in the southwest corner between floors 10 and 13, and we had put a transit on that and we were pretty sure she was going to collapse. You actually could see there was a visible bulge, it ran up about three floors. It came down about 5 o’clock in the afternoon, but by about 2 o’clock in the afternoon we realized this thing was going to collapse.

Firehouse: Was there heavy fire in there right away?

Hayden: No, not right away, and that’s probably why it stood for so long because it took a while for that fire to develop. It was a heavy body of fire in there and then we didn’t make any attempt to fight it. That was just one of those wars we were just going to lose. We were concerned about the collapse of a 47-story building there. We were worried about additional collapse there of what was remaining standing of the towers and the Marriott, so we started pulling the people back after a couple of hours of surface removal and searches along the surface of the debris. We started to pull guys back because we were concerned for their safety.


www.firehouse.com...

I've heard about the "bulge". What would cause such a bulge? This was a traditionally framed building, unlike the towers. Even if there were such a bulge, it would cause localized failure and not catastrophic failure.

I'll ask a question of you. How could they definitively say it will collapse and not may collapse, even given the bulge factor?



posted on Sep, 21 2014 @ 08:24 PM
link   

originally posted by: AlphaHawk
a reply to: Bilk22

Well you started off on the right track, when you said..



what time was it when this video footage was taken? So who told this cop in advance it was going to collapse?


But then you started jumping to conclusions without bothering to try and answer your own questions. If this was filmed around 2pm, then it was the fire department that told him, on one of those fancy things called a radio no doubt..

But we don't know the time, so we should all do what you do and just ignore that and jump to conclusions to confirm an already biased bias..


The NYFD had catastrophic failure problems with their radio's, find out before you start barking.



posted on Sep, 21 2014 @ 08:29 PM
link   

originally posted by: AlphaHawk
a reply to: Bilk22

So you missed the reports of the bulge spotted between floors 10-13 then?

They even thought the Marriott was going to collapse.


There were a lot of damaged apparatus there that were covered. We tried to get searches in those areas. By now, this is going on into the afternoon, and we were concerned about additional collapse, not only of the Marriott, because there was a good portion of the Marriott still standing, but also we were pretty sure that 7 World Trade Center would collapse. Early on, we saw a bulge in the southwest corner between floors 10 and 13, and we had put a transit on that and we were pretty sure she was going to collapse. You actually could see there was a visible bulge, it ran up about three floors. It came down about 5 o’clock in the afternoon, but by about 2 o’clock in the afternoon we realized this thing was going to collapse.

Firehouse: Was there heavy fire in there right away?

Hayden: No, not right away, and that’s probably why it stood for so long because it took a while for that fire to develop. It was a heavy body of fire in there and then we didn’t make any attempt to fight it. That was just one of those wars we were just going to lose. We were concerned about the collapse of a 47-story building there. We were worried about additional collapse there of what was remaining standing of the towers and the Marriott, so we started pulling the people back after a couple of hours of surface removal and searches along the surface of the debris. We started to pull guys back because we were concerned for their safety.


www.firehouse.com...



A Bulge huh. Well then wouldn't it collapse towards the bulge instead of straight down, and what was up with the Penthouse at the top that dropped first, bulge problems? The next time you see a steel frame building on fire, or smoldering like 7, you better run. Actually, don't worry it will never happen again.



posted on Sep, 21 2014 @ 08:30 PM
link   
The clean up crew called to 911 were also demolition experts they had demolished several buildings, there were other ties I cant remember right now I know they are briefly summarised in the black 911 video...



posted on Sep, 21 2014 @ 08:48 PM
link   
a reply to: ugmold


The next time you see a steel frame building on fire, or smoldering like 7, you better run. Actually, don't worry it will never happen again.

Smoldering, lol.

It burned unchecked for hours. it will never happen again? If those same circumstances occur, it will.

Lets see, unchecked fire, hi rise collapse times two, hundreds of rescue workers dead, debris and fire blocking access, no power or water, workers exhausted, yah, it will happen again.

All we need is some suicide pilots armed with the biggest napalm bomb, cruise missiles ever… and a city.



posted on Sep, 21 2014 @ 08:57 PM
link   
dont you know federal employees get sunday off?

anywho

good find

even if its not directly connected it doesnt help the oser case

at all



posted on Sep, 21 2014 @ 09:16 PM
link   

originally posted by: Fylgje
We need to find Tyrone and see his work order for that day. I have no doubt that building 7 was demo-ed.



I see your point, and a good one it is. I guess my line of thought was how odd it was that all of this demo equipment was already on site. As if it has been prepared long in advance. That along with the police officer knowing well in advance of the collapse. Just screams planned demo. Notice how calm all the police are. I get they are doing their jobs, but they are still human. You'd think they would be like "THIS Sh1T is CRAZY!"



posted on Sep, 21 2014 @ 09:18 PM
link   
a reply to: AlphaHawk

I bet the Marriott was going to collapse. Look where it was...





and look at the damage it sustained...



They were worried that what little was left of the Marriott would collapse. Not sure what tipped them off about building 7.



posted on Sep, 21 2014 @ 09:19 PM
link   

originally posted by: Emerys
I guess my line of thought was how odd it was that all of this demo equipment was already on site.


Exactly what demo equipment was already onsite? If you watched the video you would see hoardings behind the bins...
edit on 21-9-2014 by hellobruce because: (no reason given)



posted on Sep, 21 2014 @ 09:21 PM
link   

originally posted by: EartOccupant
a reply to: Bilk22


Don't forget there is also a video around with fire fighters telling people in advance building 7 is coming down and they need to clear the area.

I try finding it:

This is not the one, but also they know it in advance:



Another:



Firefighters were reporting over the radio that the structure was starting to fail. They saw parts of the building starting to bulge and crumple. After the towers collapsed, they obviously weren't taking any chances.

EDIT: I see this was already addressed earlier in the thread and the typical truther responses have already been posted. Predictable.
edit on 9/21/2014 by Answer because: (no reason given)



posted on Sep, 21 2014 @ 09:27 PM
link   

originally posted by: Answer

originally posted by: EartOccupant
a reply to: Bilk22


Don't forget there is also a video around with fire fighters telling people in advance building 7 is coming down and they need to clear the area.

I try finding it:

This is not the one, but also they know it in advance:



Another:



Firefighters were reporting over the radio that the structure was starting to fail. They saw parts of the building starting to bulge and crumple. After the towers collapsed, they obviously weren't taking any chances.

EDIT: I see this was already addressed earlier in the thread and the typical truther responses have already been posted. Predictable.


I didn't hear anything in those reports that said the fire fighters reported seeing bulging. Not in the 2 videos you quoted.




top topics



 
46
<< 1    3  4  5 >>

log in

join