It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
The holographic principle is a property of string theories and a supposed property of quantum gravity that states that the description of a volume of space can be thought of as encoded on a boundary to the region—preferably a light-like boundary like a gravitational horizon. First proposed by Gerard 't Hooft, it was given a precise string-theory interpretation by Leonard Susskind[1] who combined his ideas with previous ones of 't Hooft and Charles Thorn.[1][2] As pointed out by Raphael Bousso,[3] Thorn observed in 1978 that string theory admits a lower-dimensional description in which gravity emerges from it in what would now be called a holographic way.
In a larger sense, the theory suggests that the entire universe can be seen as a two-dimensional information structure "painted" on the cosmological horizon, such that the three dimensions we observe are an effective description only at macroscopic scales and at low energies. Cosmological holography has not been made mathematically precise, partly because the cosmological horizon has a finite area and grows with time.[4][5]
originally posted by: theabsolutetruth
Is there anything you could add that would show some proof of the possibility?
originally posted by: swanne
originally posted by: theabsolutetruth
Is there anything you could add that would show some proof of the possibility?
My investigations led me to the discovery of an important evidence: With only two preons (no less, no more) one can model every subatomic particles in the universe:
bbbbbb: electron
abbbbb: up antiquark
aabbbb: down quark
aaabbb: neutrinos/bosons
aaaabb: down antiquark
aaaaab: up quark
aaaaaa: positron
Full investigation
Many other properties of these particles can be accounted - with, again, only two preons:
-the three generations of fermions
-the spins of all matter and energy particles
-the antiparticles of all matter particles, and CT-symmetry
-the kaon oscillation mystery (which Phoenix-II theory solves)
-the anomalous magnetic moment of the muon
-the neutrino's oscillation into another flavor
Full investigation
Remember that I myself am reluctant to the idea that the universe is binary in nature. But the evidences seem to point to only one conclusion: that the Universe can be modelled as a (albeit very long) binary code.
It's kind of like the computer is made up of a bunch of lightswitches, and each lightswitch controls just one lightbulb. On or Off. One or Zero. But if you took all of those lightbulbs together, and said "Let's make each sequence of On-and-Off represent a different number!" Well then, you could get some pretty large numbers.
originally posted by: LittleByLittle
Your model need to be form my point of view -1 0 1 of whatever entity that exists that everything is built with (in this case thought too be preons).
If you have this then you can make a coordinate system of all in 3D and 3D can be described digitally.
The funny thing is that black whole cannot collapse in on them selves in this model since when you have a one in the resolution it cannot become more so either the black hole will have to become bigger or the information will have to cease to exist. But then black hole will not have existed anyway since time have not become infinity.
Indeed. Well, more accurately, the universe would have 5 dimension: each points of it would be defined by: -all three space dimension values -the Time value -the presence of preon (-1, 0 or +1) value
originally posted by: LittleByLittle
Now to figure out what is the smallest time quanta and space quanta so that all is represented in integers. I wonder how movement and acceleration would be described in this system.
originally posted by: Gear
Is your proposition similar to that of Nick Bostrom?
Also, how would quantum entanglement and Heisenberg's uncertainty principle tie into this?
In this reality something can either exist or not exist.
originally posted by: More1ThanAny1
Of course it is binary. In this reality something can either exist or not exist.