It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: U4ea82
a reply to: absente
Somehow I think...given the current political climate..this thread was probably a bad idea.
**backs out slowly**
originally posted by: absente
originally posted by: U4ea82
a reply to: absente
Somehow I think...given the current political climate..this thread was probably a bad idea.
**backs out slowly**
Why? I am just expressing my opinion and my personal observations, in a straight way. That doesn't make me a
terrorist or suspect, if this is where you're referring to. Please elaborate on why this was "probably a bad idea".
originally posted by: absente
"So, if a was an evil terrorist (yes, with that big white beard)"
"those dangerous sleeper cells and bearded men that will come after you and kill you"
/rant over
George
originally posted by: spy66
When the said terrorists of 911 hit the twin Towers in New York. I wondered why would they target the Towers and not one of the nuclear Power Plant the US have, or Hoover Dam?
Why dont they ever target vital government property if they really want Maximum effect on society of that nation?
originally posted by: SLAYER69
originally posted by: spy66
When the said terrorists of 911 hit the twin Towers in New York. I wondered why would they target the Towers and not one of the nuclear Power Plant the US have, or Hoover Dam?
Why dont they ever target vital government property if they really want Maximum effect on society of that nation?
If we are to believe the events of 9/11, you wouldn't call the Pentagon vital government property? Also. the plane that went down in the Pennsylvanian field was supposedly going to target either the White house or Capital building.
originally posted by: SLAYER69
a reply to: spy66
Supposedly they were striking at American prestige and by taking out a symbol of Americas Economic global strength. Two Tall Twin towers missing from the skyline were a statement towards that end more than anything.
We always hear that they have issues with the American Government not the people. *If true.
originally posted by: OpinionatedB
a reply to: spy66
I don't think it was about accomplishing a goal of killing people. It was a goal of taking down that symbol of control. It was to say, we can touch you too - we are not just victims.
originally posted by: spy66
In stead of targetting the twin Towers and pentagon, imagine what damage hitting Three Nuclear Power plants would have done to the Population and the government. These target would kill a lot more than just 3000 People. The US would have had problems dealing With such damage even to day. The US might not even have been able to retaliate against Aghnistand or Iraq because of it.
originally posted by: SLAYER69
originally posted by: spy66
In stead of targetting the twin Towers and pentagon, imagine what damage hitting Three Nuclear Power plants would have done to the Population and the government. These target would kill a lot more than just 3000 People. The US would have had problems dealing With such damage even to day. The US might not even have been able to retaliate against Aghnistand or Iraq because of it.
I see you've edited your previously reply.
I have no idea why they didn't, Who knows what kind of mental faculties those people had. I guess for some killing 3,000 people and taking down two of the worlds tallest buildings and striking at the heart of US military power in a matter of hours wasn't a big enough blood bath and act of destruction.
*Iraq had nothing to do with the attacks, No matter how much the "I love Bush and Cheney" crowd screams, whines or stomp their feet