posted on Sep, 23 2014 @ 11:02 AM
a reply to: AugustusMasonicus
I did post it...I put in a quote and also specified what to look at in the link I provided.
Regardless, I didn't say that I agree with it, I just pointed out that this law doesn't seem necessary as there is already precedent that allows for
"legal" warrantless searches in certain circumstances. I agree with your concerns about the constitutionality of it, but that doesn't change the
current reality that our court system will recognize warrantless searches as legal in some cases.