It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by instar
Merka, surely you agree that footage from nasa itself is far ore credible than a backyard handy cam? I think as much as the folk who "want to beleive" will convince themselves, the folk who "dont want to beleive" do likewise.
Originally posted by merka
Since we all have seen the oddly manipulated austronaut footage and the Mars information gaps... no I dont think Nasa is any more credible than someone catching something strange on their handycam.
At least the guy with the camera doesnt censur himself.
But anyway, I HAVE seen the huge movie about the Nasa space footages, and I still dont see it as conclusive. Its odd, but we see odd things all the time. Imagine how it would be in space then, an enviroment we are totally unfamiliar with.
Originally posted by afklop
he didnt ask you if you found nasa credible, rather, LIVE (hard to manipulate live footage, last i checked) video footage captured by them. And they explain away all the phenomena in the movie away with ridiculous theories. Therefore, it is clear that they are lying. maybe you would like to hold off on declaring them extra terrestrial ufos, but its clear nasa is lying about them. What was inconclusive about the 3 hour video?
Originally posted by merka
So UFO's an aliens are less ridiculus theories? Everything about the video is inconclusive. Have you ever been to space? I havent. I have no bloody idea how ice crystals behave in response to rocket boosters on the shuttle.
That is why it is inconclusive. We dont know crap. Whether its interesting things, even amazing things, is another matter. It remains inconclusive what it is.
Originally posted by afklop
Originally posted by merka
So UFO's an aliens are less ridiculus theories? Everything about the video is inconclusive. Have you ever been to space? I havent. I have no bloody idea how ice crystals behave in response to rocket boosters on the shuttle.
That is why it is inconclusive. We dont know crap. Whether its interesting things, even amazing things, is another matter. It remains inconclusive what it is.
maybe you should speak for yourself. *you* dont know crap. i for one, know ice crystals arent 2-3 miles wide. I know ice crystals cannot break earths gravity. I know ice crystals cant go 900,000 miles per hour. I know ice crystals dont change direction in the way these videos show they do. I know ice crystals wont just appear in the middle of the video out of thin air. grrrrrrrr
Originally posted by GrOuNd_ZeRo
Some people just don't WANT to believe it...
I doubt they want to believe it when a UFO lands in their own backyard and shakes hands with them...
Originally posted by merka
I agree. I am *NOT* in any way qualified to speak about ice crystals in space and how they behave. You apparently are, you must be very smart and experienced to have travelled in space and know the physics of extraterrestrial ice crystals.
Sidenote: One thing I am pretty sure of though, is that they CAN appear out of thin air: You can only see them if light is reflected off them... A crystal could probably vary its reflection by quite alot.
Originally posted by Cade
Now, as we move along in our common journey towards deeper inlightenment, allow me to direct your attention to yet another piece of NASA evidence. This movie is called "The Secret NASA transmissions". This time it's we see a "blanket of stars" underneath the shuttle AND the transmission to Houston!
Originally posted by Cade
This video is conclusive evidence.
Originally posted by merka
But it *STILL* doesnt make it conclusive, since we dont have any reference of what should be there, what is natural to percieve. An alien entity is only an alien entity if its alien. Or something like that
[edit on 8-12-2004 by merka]