It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: midicon
originally posted by: nonspecific
a reply to: ScepticScot
I think it was more to do with the fact that I did not fully agree with there agenda and less to do with his place of birth within the United Kingdom.
Sometimes people need to feel superior but the display has the opposite effect. Some just want to argue no matter what. It is not so much an agenda as a display of personality.
originally posted by: flammadraco
originally posted by: ScepticScot
a reply to: flammadraco
Ehm no its exactly what I have said all along Shetland islands are part of Scotland and there is no demand to change that?
The only link I remember you posting was one to an article about a conspiracy to create the idea that Shetland islanders wanted independence from Scotland. If I gave missed another my apologies and if you could kindly relink.
However I am pretty sure there is no act of parliament giving Shetlands an opt out. Especially not one created 35 years in advance if the actual referendum just in case.
Scotland had a "Devolved Government" referendum in 1979 which was lost and another referendum in 1997 which won. The opt out clause was added to the act in 1979 by parliament.
originally posted by: Soloprotocol
originally posted by: flammadraco
originally posted by: ScepticScot
a reply to: flammadraco
Ehm no its exactly what I have said all along Shetland islands are part of Scotland and there is no demand to change that?
The only link I remember you posting was one to an article about a conspiracy to create the idea that Shetland islanders wanted independence from Scotland. If I gave missed another my apologies and if you could kindly relink.
However I am pretty sure there is no act of parliament giving Shetlands an opt out. Especially not one created 35 years in advance if the actual referendum just in case.
Scotland had a "Devolved Government" referendum in 1979 which was lost and another referendum in 1997 which won. The opt out clause was added to the act in 1979 by parliament.
Actually more people voted for Devolution in 79 than voted against, 51% for--48% against, but what can you do when Westminster throws in a Dodgy, never been heard of 40% rule
originally posted by: grainofsand
I expect my government to negotiate ruthlessly in any legal way it can with another foreign nation.
originally posted by: ScepticScot
a reply to: Soloprotocol
If I remember correctly this 40% was based on a electoral register containing a large number of deceased who hadn't been removed making it even harder to achieve. I am in favour if a wide electoral franchise but votes for the dead just goes to far.
originally posted by: ScepticScot
a reply to: flammadraco
So is relavent to a referendum on independence in 2014 how?
originally posted by: Soloprotocol
Shetlands can ask for a referendum...Will they get it...Hmmmmm
The SNP’s economic case for independence has been significantly undermined after the party admitted that the oil-rich Northern Isles would be allowed to opt out of joining a separate Scotland.
Angus MacNeil, the SNP’s rural affairs spokesman, told the BBC that both Shetland and Orkney would be permitted to remain part of the UK regardless of the referendum result “if there was a big enough drive for self-determination” among their residents.
originally posted by: grainofsand
originally posted by: Soloprotocol
Shetlands can ask for a referendum...Will they get it...Hmmmmm
With the backing of a more powerfully established and networked UK yes, I see no reason why they can't if the UK can make our deal a sweeter offer than Scotlands...and I'm sure the UK can.
WTF could foreign Scotland do about it if the UK follows international law?