posted on Sep, 20 2014 @ 11:32 AM
a reply to: amazing
I do not have a problem with the legit research going on. Research should be to examine conditions and determine the cause, if possible, or to present
possible causes and a hypothesis.
Too often you see the research begin with an assumption, or half an assumption and then proceed to attempt to find a way to prove that assumption. You
see this all the time when the paper focuses on single aspects at the expence of other likely and proven effects.
How many papers that deal with co2 come to conclusions that man is responsible for x% or x amount of heat or forcing? Give those papers a really hard
look and you see that they do not take into account proven contributors. Such as variations in water vapor content, oceanic cooling and heating
cycles, astronomic cycles.
You absolutely cannot, with as complex a system as climate, leave out contributing factors simply because they do not fit the agenda, and then explain
all the phenomena based on greenhouse gas effect. That is misleading at the best!