It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

‘Mysterious’ Blue Lights Invade Woman’s Home

page: 1
17
<<   2  3  4 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Sep, 14 2014 @ 02:02 AM
link   
This article and video discuss blue balls of light that are caught on camera by a woman in her home. She asks a professional, John Bomhoff, who has been a videographer and editor for over 30 years, if he can analyze what she caught; he says he has never seen anything like this.

At first view, he thought the lights were just some sort of bioluminescent insect, but he quickly changed his mind when Sally mentioned that they were invisible to the naked eye.


“I began to analyze the footage. A few things were obvious from the start,” he explains. “They are not reflections of anything, they move in directions totally unrelated to the camera movement, and they move just as much when the camera is still. They move much faster than the camera is moving, and although many seem to be straight lines, they are not all in straight lines.”
The lights also taken random turns and don’t seem to be afraid of the camera.



Bomhoff calls these blue pickets. I call them blue orbs.


Listen to Bomhoff's analysis in the video:


cryptozoologynews.com...




posted on Sep, 14 2014 @ 02:15 AM
link   
Wow thats different lol rods springs to mind haha very cool post SnF...



posted on Sep, 14 2014 @ 02:23 AM
link   
a reply to: sled735

What utter rubbish.

I'm sorry but this is ridiculous, she's filming bugs, how can anyone not see this?



posted on Sep, 14 2014 @ 02:24 AM
link   
a reply to: AlphaHawk

But. But.
She said there weren't any bugs.



posted on Sep, 14 2014 @ 02:26 AM
link   
a reply to: Phage

Yeah...about that...

I guess it's because they're invisible to the naked eye she says that!


edit on 14-9-2014 by AlphaHawk because: (no reason given)



posted on Sep, 14 2014 @ 02:27 AM
link   

originally posted by: AlphaHawk
a reply to: sled735

What utter rubbish.

I'm sorry but this is ridiculous, she's filming bugs, how can anyone not see this?



Do you really think a man with over 30 years experience in film analysis wouldn't know what a freakin' bug looks like?
Did you watch ALL the video analysis?



posted on Sep, 14 2014 @ 02:29 AM
link   
a reply to: sled735

I got some of the way through..I stopped when he says they don't appear to fly away from the camera and then a few seconds later one clearly flys away from the camera....

His "30 years experience" is just fluff to fool the weak minded, making them think what he says carries authority.



posted on Sep, 14 2014 @ 02:29 AM
link   
a reply to: sled735
He said they looked like bugs.
But. But. She said they were invisible so they can't be bugs.


edit on 9/14/2014 by Phage because: (no reason given)



posted on Sep, 14 2014 @ 02:29 AM
link   
a reply to: sled735

it's the end of a flash light ...



posted on Sep, 14 2014 @ 02:32 AM
link   

originally posted by: AlphaHawk
a reply to: sled735

I got some of the way through..I stopped when he says they don't appear to fly away from the camera and then a few seconds later one clearly flys away from the camera....

His "30 years experience" is just fluff to fool the weak minded, making them think what he says carries authority.



Or maybe it's the "weak-minded" that can't handle the "truth".



posted on Sep, 14 2014 @ 02:37 AM
link   
I'd say the gray flying things are fleas, and the white spots are lacewing flies or falling dust from the ceiling.



posted on Sep, 14 2014 @ 02:42 AM
link   
a reply to: stormcell

I've never in my over 50 years seen a flea that goes zipping through the air like that. And both of those would be visible to the naked eye.

Clearly, you didn't watch the video, did you? Maybe you should go back and watch his analysis before you post your opinion on what it is.




edit on 9/14/2014 by sled735 because: add comment



posted on Sep, 14 2014 @ 02:44 AM
link   
He says at the end that he believes they are very small bugs, he just can't explain why they only show up on her phone. Not really that controversial.



posted on Sep, 14 2014 @ 02:48 AM
link   

originally posted by: jaws1975
He says at the end that he believes they are very small bugs, he just can't explain why they only show up on her phone. Not really that controversial.


He also said he wasn't sure what they were, and asked anyone with any ideas to post on his site. This man obviously isn't familiar with orbs. He doesn't even call them by the correct name. He called them Pickets.
The name isn't what's important though. It's the analysis that is.



posted on Sep, 14 2014 @ 02:50 AM
link   
a reply to: sled735



Or maybe it's the "weak-minded" that can't handle the "truth".


You could be right.

Is that why you won't accept that they're bugs?



posted on Sep, 14 2014 @ 03:03 AM
link   
a reply to: sled735

I agree, I meant that he's not getting crazy with his speculation. The video is interesting, would have been even cooler if his camera had picked them up too.



posted on Sep, 14 2014 @ 03:28 AM
link   
a reply to: sled735

Lol. The first half of the video is like, "sure this seems believable," then he guy "increases saturation" and is ignorant of the effect that increasing an image's saturation has on elements in the image. He's been a videographer and video editor for 30+ years? Please.

There are slow motion cameras that can records hundreds, if not thousands, of frames per second. If these people are really confused, they should try using one of these cameras. If the effects only show up on video recorded by the woman's iPhone, then there is something wrong with her iPhone. Maybe some Chinese sweatshop blood magic.



posted on Sep, 14 2014 @ 03:29 AM
link   

originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: sled735
He said they looked like bugs.
But. But. She said they were invisible so they can't be bugs.


Yup. Yup. ... He waits until about the 9:10 mark of the video to say just that. Blue pickets my ass. LOL

Did you also note they were trying to film under high intensity lighting? LOL Not like ol' Sally wasn't trying to draw flies.

I'm gonna stop wasting my time on this kind of nonsense. My 'weak mind' can't handle the truth. (Best Jack Nicholson impression ... of course)



posted on Sep, 14 2014 @ 04:22 AM
link   
a reply to: sled735

Good thread. S&F


Here is a blowup that DarkBlade71 took of an orb when he went to The Palmer House Plantation.
You can see the eyes (looking to our right), and the open smiling mouth. It has similar colors that are shown in the orb that Bomhoff is analyzing. If this orb was shown during flight it would probably look the same.




posted on Sep, 14 2014 @ 04:36 AM
link   
a reply to: Mindless1980

Dust doesn't have eyes




top topics



 
17
<<   2  3  4 >>

log in

join