I was a bit disturbed when I saw this article. Apparently people have turned to the FCC to file complaints about racism (racism type broadcasts) and
were told by the FCC that the FCC had no jurisdiction in such cases because such programming was protected by the 1st Amendment. Ok. So then if that
is they case why have they targeted Howard Stern? I mean if hate is protected by the 1st Amendment then why isn't sexually explicit material? What
is worse? Hate or sex?
Do you have a link to the article? The FCC is actually a direct violation of the 1st Amendment. Everything is literally protected under the 1st
Amendment. Howard Stern is the perfect scapegoat for the FCC. Don't worry, he's going Sirrus Radio. You can sleep well at night again.
This content community relies on user-generated content from our member contributors. The opinions of our members are not those of site ownership who maintains strict editorial agnosticism and simply provides a collaborative venue for free expression.