It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: borntowatch
Dogs have one common ancestor, probably the wolf.
I hope this silly question has a point
originally posted by: MonkeyFishFrog
a reply to: borntowatch
You're mistaking the geological timescale principal of stratification which is the study of sediment deposits to determine age with radiometric dating, the actual method of determining the age of the Earth and fossils. There are radioactive isotopes that decay in steady and consistent rates over time. Physicists and chemists are able to measure the amount of an element present in a sample to see how old it is.
You live in Western Australia. Are you familiar with Jack Hills? Jack Hills is home to the oldest known rocks and crystals on Earth. They've dated them to be 4.3 billion years old.
I've even had the opportunity to hold a sample.
originally posted by: thedeadtruth
The bible misses more history than it catches. Entire civilizations and continents are not even mentioned.
Care to explain that ?
originally posted by: Answer
originally posted by: borntowatch
Dogs have one common ancestor, probably the wolf.
I hope this silly question has a point
Excellent. Now how did we get the variety of breeds seen today? Selective breeding which caused genetic changes to the population.
If you can admit that the variety of dog breeds all came from a common ancestor, you have accepted that evolution is a real process. See, that wasn't so hard.
originally posted by: wyrmboy12
You guys that believe in evolution always fail in your arguments with 1 single trip up.....You need a new species for evolution to be evolution.....and its never happened...
3) Evolution is still a theory. Why are people claiming it as fact when the theory has no actual evidnce ( Its data people are choosing to interpret certain ways without any compromise...That doesn't mean any of those conclusions are valid...Its a joke )
A guy at work told me about some random guy that wanted to selectively breed a version of the fox to not be afraid of humans...Apparently there is a gene or other physical trait in some animals that causes them to fear humans...He would kill any foxes that acted afraid of him and breed the ones that did not until all of the foxes in his possession were not afraid of him...My wo worker went onto to explain that as aresult the physical make up of the foxes changes resulting in them having longer ears....My co worker claimed this was forced evolution....I told him No thats eugenics ( and it is ).....Selective breeding is also not evolution...thats why its called selective breeding...This is the crap evolutionsits believe wholeheartedly....and people here call me ignorant? LOL
originally posted by: borntowatch
You know your problem KS, you have a closed mind
I have a legitimate conundrum, maybe not to you. So you say my view, understanding is irrelevant and thats fine.
Its not irrelevant to me.
All I hear is someone not addressing the issue, sidestepping and making up reasons to sidestep.
Me I would hear the problem, understand the issue and then explain why I choose to think alternately.
Biological evolution is the final link in the chain (possibly a spiritual evolution), if it is not to you, if it doesnt make sense why comment.
Is this an exercise in pride, authority, do you feel power in belittling me, make you a bigger person?
It makes me see the opposite, also makes me think you have a closed and little mind
The universe evolved, the elements, the planets then us.
take out any one of those movements and its all redundant
But no, I have to obey you, submit myself to your reasoning with out explanation. Who is the child?
originally posted by: wyrmboy12
3) Evolution is still a theory. Why are people claiming it as fact when the theory has no actual evidnce ( Its data people are choosing to interpret certain ways without any compromise...That doesn't mean any of those conclusions are valid...Its a joke )
originally posted by: peter vlar
originally posted by: wyrmboy12
You guys that believe in evolution always fail in your arguments with 1 single trip up.....You need a new species for evolution to be evolution.....and its never happened...
I always love when someone claims that proponents of evolution fail in their arguments and then proceed to have less than a basic understanding of what it is evolutionary theory states. The only failure I'm seeing is your definition of evolution and your lack of research into the topic.
3) Evolution is still a theory. Why are people claiming it as fact when the theory has no actual evidnce ( Its data people are choosing to interpret certain ways without any compromise...That doesn't mean any of those conclusions are valid...Its a joke )
Then give some examples. Blanket statements don't make for a valid argument anymore than your lack of understanding of what a scientific theory is or what supporting data exists.
A guy at work told me about some random guy that wanted to selectively breed a version of the fox to not be afraid of humans...Apparently there is a gene or other physical trait in some animals that causes them to fear humans...He would kill any foxes that acted afraid of him and breed the ones that did not until all of the foxes in his possession were not afraid of him...My wo worker went onto to explain that as aresult the physical make up of the foxes changes resulting in them having longer ears....My co worker claimed this was forced evolution....I told him No thats eugenics ( and it is ).....Selective breeding is also not evolution...thats why its called selective breeding...This is the crap evolutionsits believe wholeheartedly....and people here call me ignorant? LOL
It's not eugenics, it's selecting for specific traits. It's forcing natural selection. It's been done and these fox are able to be imported from Russia who has pioneered this work for decades.
originally posted by: Maltese5Rhino
It is like Bread being toasted slowed down by a billion times. Half the time it is still considered bread and then it is considered as Toast. You can see it transitioning and changing over time because of an external enviroment. Because it happens quickly we can say after a minute that slice of bread is now toast and obviously was bread before. Like IMO evolution takes longer and so long with external forces that change with it we cannot see the simple connections.
originally posted by: thedeadtruth
So what. There are lots of historically accurate history books around. Where they ALL written by Giod just because they are accurate.......? You might want to raise your standards there a bit. Which gets to my other point I made that you didnt absorb.
My point was simple..... Even if you think the world has only been around 6 thousand years. The bible misses more history than it catches. Entire civilizations and continents are not even mentioned.
Care to explain that ?
originally posted by: borntowatch
What came before the wolf, what animal
Its a simple question.
What came before the elephant, the girraffe, where is the scientific evidence, the bones, the bodies.