There are many "conspiracy theories" that float about when it comes to understanding America and it's powers. From the "Who Shot J.F.K.?"
stories, to those who believe the 9/11disaster could have been nothing other than a hologramand well placed explosives. But let'stake a minute to
analyse the phrase "Conspiracy Theory."
- a belief that some covert but influential organization is responsible for an unexplained event.
It says nowhere in that definition that a conspiracy theory may not be credible, or plausible, or even likely, yet various establishments over the
years have "weaponised" the term, in order to discredit those who may favour them, and brand them as "The Tin Foil Hat Brigade."
So, lets take a look back at some historical conspiracy theories.
First, lets look at the private sector. Many "paranoid freaks" once suggested that tobacco firms had engineered their particular brands of tobacco
to be more addictive than their rivals'. This was discounted as ridiculous ramblings of the minority, yet in 1999, ASH and the Imperial Cancer
Research Fund, investigated various tobacco product manufacturers and found that indeed they DID indeed engineer their products to increase addiction.
Not only that, but the rabbit hole went deeper. Their evidence indicated that Chocolate and other sweet ingredients were used in the making of such
products to make them more palettable to children, and the other additives used were toxic themselves, increasing the harm that smoking them would do.
BUT.... the conspiracy theorists were mad were they?
Or what about the early days of the internet? Remember those dial-up modems and that awful sound? Well some crazy people suggested that the adverts we
were seeing, or having to obsessively exit when the pop-ups flooded the screen, seemed to know what we were looking for, so surely they must be spying
on what we were typing and visiting... The younger readers among you probably accept this as the norm, as it is now public knowledge that this DOES
happen, but back then, it was crazy talk...
But what about the more important, the more damaging conspiracy theories? The ones that shook the world, the ones that allegedly covered up murders
etc? Well there's always the idea that was spread about that the US government were supplying life-wrecking drugs to the poorer communities... That
wasn't too far from the truth after all. Here is a quote from www.infowars.com...
The Central Intelligence Agency has been implicated in drug trafficking operations all over the world as well as domestically, most notably during the
Iran-Contra affair, under which Contra personnel smuggled coc aine into the U.S. with the blessing of the CIA which was then distributed as crack
coc aine in Los Angeles, with the profits being funneled back to the Contras.
Former Los Angeles Police Department officer Michael Ruppert also testified that he had witnessed CIA drug trafficking.
Top Mexican drug lords like Jesus Vicente Zambada Niebla have also gone public to assert that they were hired by the U.S. government for drug
trafficking operations. There is a voluminous body of evidence that confirms the CIA and U.S. banking giants are the top players in a global drug
trade worth hundreds of billions of dollars a year, information made public by the likes of Gary Webb.
It gets worse. There are such events throughout America's history. As far back as the American Civil War, there is still discrepancies tha remain
unsolved as to what really happened in some battles. But back in 1990, as tension in the Gulf rose, a young, honest looking girl went before the
Congressional Human Rights to plead with them, telling them about all the atrocities that were happening in Kuwait. "Nurse Nayirah" told the world
that the Iraqis (they're a common enemy arent they?) were literally murdering new born babies, taking them from their incubators and taking the
incubators away. That sounds like the kind of horror you only read in the Bible. Of course the public were outraged that such a thing could be
happening, and the US government got the public backing to go and back Kuwait, so Bush got his Gulf War that he so desperately sought. The western
media broadcast and reported her testimony multiple times, on as many networks that they could... but no one reported the truth. The truth, was that
she was the daughter of Kuwaiti Ambassador to the US, Saud Al-Sabah, and her testimony was engineered to provide the outcome that it effected. The sad
truth, was that babies did indeed die, at or near the time that she stated. But it was found to be the fault of the Kuwaiti doctors and nurses that
fled the hospitals, leaving them behind. Now, it is publicly accessable knowledge that these are indeed the facts, yet trust is still investedin our
world governments despite the amount of times the wool is pulled over our eyes to manipulate us towards a particular end.
The US aren't alone. England joined forces with them for operation Gladio, which later became responsible for many unneccessary civilian deaths,
diguised as terror attacks by other parties, very similar to when the Nazis attacked a German radio station dressed in Polish uniforms.
Then there's the Spanish-American War. The sinking of the USS Maine is said to have started it, when an alleged Spanish mine exploded beneath the
ship, sinking it. TWO american led investigations determined that as the cause. An independent inquiry reached a different conclusion. It was found to
be an INTERNAL explosion, most likely a result of the combustion of fuel coal which was being stored next to a room containing 4.5 tonnes of powder
charges. Perhaps a mistake, but that would have undoubtedly been discovered in their initial examinations.
Then there's the bribery and propaganda that took place during the coup d'état in Iran, 1953. Last year the CIA admitted liability for this, a
quick google will show you the details, now mostly declassified and available to view in the CIA archives.
Also newly declassified, are files that suggest that the USS Maddox incident, or the Gulf of Tonkin incident, was a false flag operation by the NSA.
It used manufactured radar signatures to make it appear the on the second incident that there were North Vietnamese Naval vessels present,when in fact
there were not.
The list goes on. At the time these incidents occured, any suggestion that our governments were being dishonest would have been either laughed at, or
punishable. Yet now we know for a fact, that the "Tin Foil Hat Brigade" were right in these instances to suggest foul play by a "covert but
So what about today? What recent events have conspiracy theories surrounding them, and are they credible?
Let's start in Ukraine. When the Western Media portrayed what was happening during the sniper shootings in Odessa, they told us that there were
snipers both sides, shooting eachother. However, medical examiners have deduced that all the casualties that resulted from said snipers were shot from
the same point of origin, with even some of the ballistics matching up. It just so happens, that three weeks prior to this awful, awful event,
American private military travelled to the area. I do not know under which name they travelled, they have a few to choose from, there's Blackwater,
Xe Services, Constellis Holdings
(continued in following post)