It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: redhorse
originally posted by: jude11
a reply to: grainofsand
I only state this because it seems that a false statement might have been made by your son as to his legal age and ability to work at all? Just a guess of course. Or did the employer falsify a document? Or you?
When you started the OP I believe many thought this was a kid working for cash. At least I did.
So now my question is if the Director even knew he had hired someone illegally because Paperwork is a different story.
Peace
Or the whole story is absolute B.S.
Listen, I know I'm going to get hammered for this but most of the OP's post history is made up of Oh Yeah, That Really Happened Stories, or some obscure piece of internet journalism that he uses to posit some That Happened Story. Almost all of which center obsessively around his alleged 16 year old brilliant, athletic, perfect-in-every-way, son who only got that we because the OP is a wonderful, responsible, always-has-his-boy's-back, emotionally-well-rounded father.
All of the capers of this father son duo that we are treated to are carefully interwoven and then defended with a cognitive dissonance that is breath-taking in its totality and a hypocrisy so baffling and yet consistent that it can only be achieved by the profoundly self-unaware or a very, very gifted (if twisted) story-teller.
Personally, I'm betting on the former. I think that he is the son or possibly, he does have a sixteen year old son somewhere and he isn't allowed anywhere near that kid. The wish-fulfillment aspect is so consistent in these posts you could almost dance to it no matter what. Not to mention that most of these posts are hung on some moral dilemma or divisive topic that the OP inevitably takes some self-righteous and/or morally gray stance on. It is just really... weird and suspicious.
I try to take posters at face value, but this guy so obsessively churns out I'm A Great Dad self-aggrandizement agenda driven posts that if he does have a son I would be very worried about that son's emotional well-being. I hope he doesn't.
So, this is an attack I suppose and I apologize jude for using your post for a de-rail and a personal attack on the OP. I expect to get reprimanded by the moderators accordingly but good lord... Somebody needed to say it. Grainofsand is either completely full of it or desperately in need of therapy or some unknown combination of the two. I will say, it is usually interesting though.
originally posted by: Halfswede
I don't think anyone is taking issue with the legality of the employers actions in regard to working the extra hours. The problem people have is that the OP fully admits:
"I was happy with my son working the hours..."
originally posted by: Halfswede
The people like the OP who keep pointing at some "BS rule" and blaming the business may be correct in the letter of the law, but cannot seem to grasp any sense of honor or moral decency which precedes law by eons. The only correct move here is to walk away.
You simply don't get to have any moral high ground when you fully support your son's activities and then cry foul at how he was "exploited" when you openly SUPPORTED the exploitation. The fact that the OP can't see this makes me incredibly sad that there are people who literally can't tell right from wrong at a fundamental level.
originally posted by: grainofsand
a reply to: Blaine91555
The individual director screwed him over for personal reasons and picked him out over other staff for the minor offences, guess you love authority, unless it involves stopping employers making over hours rota's for child workers?
Seems to me your issue is not with the hours worked, but rather that he went above and beyond and was not shown any loyalty in return. Well guess what? He just learned a valuable lesson in how the world works in regards to business.
originally posted by: grainofsand
a reply to: Grimpachi
Nope, my son has just deleted it from his CV/resume, no-one will ever know.
originally posted by: grainofsand
a reply to: parad0x122
Haha, my son loved the wages, but he broke no laws, the employer did.
He was not personally damaged, but the law does not care about that, it is clear about hours 16 year olds can work, and the employer knowingly broke the law as it suited them, and tried to screw him over something BS at the end of the season.
originally posted by: parad0x122
a reply to: grainofsand
One thought:
If the rule he broke that got him fired is so minor, why haven't you told us what he did?
originally posted by: Grimpachi
a reply to: grainofsand
Will the fact that this is going to arbitration and hurting the employer backfire in any way on him finding further employment?
If not then I say the law is the law but if so then it might not have been worth it.
originally posted by: kdyam
S
If you son takes this to heart and learns to exploit companies the same way in the future looking for loopholes you are just a few proud hairs away from having reared and raised a criminal...
originally posted by: parad0x122
a reply to: grainofsand
They absolutely are interesting to discuss.
The main concept I'm interested in here though, is the concept of revenge.
The employer was good enough to put themselves at risk of legal action by allowing him to work more hours than he should have.
Your son had no problem cashing those checks while they were still coming, and you had no problem allowing him to be "taken advantage of".
Now that the cash cow has moved onto greener pastures, you're sour and seeking an underhanded lawsuit.
Great example to set for the young buck.