a reply to: BasementWarriorKryptonite
That's the only thing you have got right. You might consider my posts to be anything you wish - including immature and emotional, but I'd like
to remind you that I'm a human being and these things come naturally to us. If you think I'll ignore my emotions, you're insane.
I'm not sure why you're so pissy about words changing - words change throughout the history of their use. Get over it.
Wow..You make more and more mature posts as this thread continues on. Even your language faculties demonstrate this while you try to pigeon hole me
into a corner on the same topic of words and language. Astonishing. No problem once again. I merely point this out to readers who can still think for
Unless you can intimidate other readers to shut down and leave this thread...by such dissonance techniques...you are going to need more practice. You
are coming across now more like plea bargaining or at least resorting to baseness and crassness.
I should probably tell you that I work in a shipyard..on the ships. I endure such crassness and baseness often among men and males who ..outside of
their work/jobs ..their stock in trade is women, alcohol, the gods of sports, and base language faculties. I am not impressed with any or either.
Even the women working here ..have mostly a four letter word vocabulary.
One thing you do not do here when working the particularly hazardous jobs and tasks..is emote your way through them...with drama. You will get
yourself and those around you killed or maimed. This is how I can see right through your posts and emotions. Those of us who know ...have learned to
discipline our emotions..and funnel these emotions into getting jobs done by skills/disciplines..not self indulgence..or drama...instant gratification
I do not change my beliefs and understandings because I put my gear away in my locker. This knowledge comes home with me ..right here.
That is free for you..BasementWarriorKryptonite..no cover charge. This in the idea that you understand now our differences and why.
It does indeed take two people to make a conflict...two or more. There is a conflict going on here?? What is it?? Do tell??
If gay people are focusing on their sexuality, then those against gay people are doing the same.
Wow!! G. F. W. Hegel??? Thesis, antithesis, Synthesis?? I think you assume to much here in order to go on to your next assumption in crisis management
Why would you be so far gone as to assume that there is a focus against gay people...based on sexuality..and that is the only two possibilities?? Why
would you be so ignorant as to limit the thinking to only that??
I say this to demonstrate your provincial thinking.
Remember what I stated in a previous post about not having all the cards in the deck and then dealing them out thinking no one would catch it?? You
are doing it right here ..again!!
People who know and can think for themselves do not want to view people through their sex and sexuality...particularly as the very first thing by
which to be accosted. Thinking people find this to be base and vulgar..very common.
They do not want to look at everything and anything through the prism of sex and sexuality.
However ..due to mass marketing ..and particularly in public education and television movie education..the same thing...most people do not even think
this way today. This is not normal..it is propaganda...conditioning.
I, on the other hand, have conditioned myself to not think this way and spot it in those who do.
I have done the same thing on the subject of Race..I do not want to look upon a person first through the prism of race.
But I do notice when people do exactly that. I want to look upon them by their potential as a human being..not their race.
Same thing with sex and sexuality. I do not want to look upon people through this prism as well..but on their other human attributes...and I don't
mean ..women, alcohol, the gods of sports and foul language abilities. Understand now??
I am not interested in yours or anyone else's romance life, nor their sex lives. Understand??? And I certainly am not interested in it being boasted
about in public as a badge or index of merit or glory.
I do not think this to deep for you..but I am concerned that it may go way over the head of BasementWarriorKryptonite who seems to be caught in an
Not everyone out here is interested in the standard issue propaganda default settings. They are not that easily controlled by dissonance techniques or
todays language of dissonance.
And this is exactly the stock in trade of the Homosexual movements , the race movements, and also the womens movements...dissonance.
Once you learn to spot it ...you will see it every time and with predictability and almost every time. Because the methods and patterns
operation are very very similar. Almost a Xerox copy of each other..complete with emotions and drama.
Look at your words for example, when people talk about gays you keep saying "people are more than their sexuality", but gay does not
automatically have to refer to sexuality, it can also refer to romance between people of the same gender as well.
It's very interesting that when people think of "straight" they don't only thing of sexuality but they think of romance, but for some people, when
they see the word "gay" they automatically think of sexuality.
No gay does not always have to refer to sex and sexuality which is what I have been stating...when I declare that people are so much more than this.
Gay or straight. And I am not interested in the romance life or sex lives of others and do not want to look at them through this prism.
But what are the "Enlightened people " on this thread talking about In a reflection of gay?? Are they talking about the same thing I am trying to cast
light upon?? Or are they referring to peoples sex lives?? I don't think it ever occurred to most of them to think of it in the manner I am
describing..the propaganda and non thinking is so entrenched today by media controlled lives and thinking..or if you prefer ..non
I do not choose to look at people through the prizm of their sex lives..gay or straight. It is none of my business. It is private and should so
remain. Hence I state and have determined that people should not be defined by their sex or sexuality. They should be defined by traits more important
than ones sex or sexuality.
The only manner in which people can be taught to constantly think of others by their sex and sexuality is if they have been dumbed down and have
little to no concept of other lines of thinking and thought. In other words..this line of thinking for which I am describing or this line of thought
is forbidden to them..not allowed..not promoted..not taught.
And this is one of the goals of dissonance...censorship.
I am also not into censorship..particularly of thought..ideas and understanding.
Hope this helps clarify,
Thanks again to all for their posts,
edit on 21-9-2014 by orangetom1999 because: (no reason given)