It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Before the advent of Jesus, "Christ" was worshiped as the Aeon of God (LOGOS). After the advent of Jesus, early Christian taught that Jesus "Christ" was the Aeon of God.
Torah translated into Greek (246 BCE)
[/quote].Translated from an earlier Torah.
Did I say I believed the Chinese were? No, I said they do. Would you be the one to tell them they are wrong about deeply embedded dragon culture? Wouldn't that be insensitive?
edit on 9/12/2014 by WarminIndy because: (no reason given)
Prior to Jesus, the Hebrews did not worship any so called logos. There simply was not any so called logos to worship by their understanding.
Before Christ (Jesus) there was no Christ (Greek) in the Hebrew.
THE PROPER REASON ACCORDING TO PLUTARCH
LIII. 1. For Isis is the feminine [principle] of Nature and that which is capable of receiving the whole of genesis; in virtue of which she has been called “Nurse” and “All-receiving” by Plato, 1 and, by the multitude, “She of ten-thousand names,” through her being transformed by Reason (Logos) and receiving all forms and ideas [or shapes].
2. And she hath an innate love of the First and Most Holy of all things (which is identical with the Good), and longs after and pursues it. But she flees from and repels the domain of the Bad, and though she is the field and matter of them both, yet doth she ever incline to the Better of herself, and offers [herself] for him to beget and sow into herself emanations and likenesses, with which she joys and delights that she is pregnant and big with their generations.
3. For Generation is image of Essence in Matter and Becoming copy of Being.
LIV. 1. Hence not unreasonably do they say in the myth that [while] the Soul of Osiris is eternal and indestructible, Typhon often tears his Body in pieces and makes it disappear, and that Isis seeks it wandering and puts it together again.
Would you be the one to tell them they are wrong about deeply embedded dragon culture? Wouldn't that be insensitive?
Some of the Lives, such as those of Heracles, Philip II of Macedon and Scipio Africanus, no longer exist; many of the remaining Lives are truncated, contain obvious lacunae or have been tampered with by later writers.
After I wrote that reply to you I sat down and put together a thread I called The Seven Millennial Days The Seven Days and God's Plan to share my view on the Plan of God or whatever we should call it. The numbers are rough estimates, I believe the different days vary in length, I simply put in rough estimates to show how I interpret this system. I'd love to hear your views on it.
If you expect us to accept Plutarch, then why can't you accept Josephus?
You know, Plutarch wrote about Heracles (Hercules) as if the man were real.
Yes, the esoteric Hebrews did. Every time the Old Testament refers to the "Angel of the LORD", that's a reference to the LOGOS, and, go ahead and google it, Christians insist that that Aoen, "The Angel of the LORD" WAS Jesus.
Yes, the esoteric Hebrews did. Every time the Old Testament refers to the "Angel of the LORD", that's a reference to the LOGOS, and, go ahead and google it, Christians insist that that Aoen, "The Angel of the LORD" WAS Jesus.
And who were these (Greek word) esoteric Jews that we were not talking about?
The discussion was in reference to the Hebrew national concept of a Christ before Jesus came upon the scene. You have nothing new to bring to the table. A Christ is strictly Greek and not Hebrew origin nor even understood by a Hebrew.
. Prior to the Greeks your logos philosophy did not exist.
originally posted by: Seede
a reply to: Utnapisjtim
After I wrote that reply to you I sat down and put together a thread I called The Seven Millennial Days The Seven Days and God's Plan to share my view on the Plan of God or whatever we should call it. The numbers are rough estimates, I believe the different days vary in length, I simply put in rough estimates to show how I interpret this system. I'd love to hear your views on it.
Yes Utnapisjtim, you deserve lots of flags and stars for that unique work. Very fascinating read. Took me awhile to read the clock calendar and OT but it is a great piece. Will have to check these forums more often. The dates will vary from one perspective of one person to another but you and I both know that everyone will never agree to same dates. Even the most brilliant scholars will not agree and it really makes some critical thinkers re think. I believe ATS has some brilliant people on their forums and I also consider you in that class. Will re read this and try to absorb your thoughts. Thanks
Yep, Greek, Egyptian and Jewish mythology all mixed into one book called the Septuagint.
You still do not understand. The Septuagint consisted only of Torah.
Now for you to say that the Septuagint was Greek, Egyptian and Jewish mythology shows me that you absolutely have no comprehension of what you have said.
originally posted by: Seede
a reply to: windword
Yep, Greek, Egyptian and Jewish mythology all mixed into one book called the Septuagint.
You still do not understand. The Septuagint consisted only of Torah. The first five books of the present Tanakh.
It was written in Greek and and according to some, it came to be as a result of Ptolomy assigning 72 (or 70 depending on the source) Greek speaking Jewish elders in Alexandria to write down copies of the Torah.