It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Project Golden Dragon - The Clementine conspiracy

page: 1
14
<<   2 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Sep, 1 2014 @ 01:29 PM
link   
The biggest secret of mankind - The Clementine conspiracy a.k.a. Project Golden Dragon

Yea, well we'll see about that. . . off to the twilight zone!
The video is long, about 1 hour and hasn't been posted before, that I could find.
I don't suggest you watch it now because it's a holiday, go outside!
But later if your bored have at it.



Here is the description that was listed with the video:

Updated version of Extraterrestrial technology on the Moon a.k.a. "Project Golden Dragon".

Before you watch this video please read this message:

This project is based on a personal "theory" about a major conspiracy by the US Department of Defense, a whistle-blower who left cryptographic clues and finally complete exposure of an obfuscated object found in the Zeeman crater.

* * * This is no scientific build disclosure (yet). * * *

This presentation is the result of 14 years of research; collecting data, analyzing and making enhancements using high-end forensic image enhancement software. I needed a very long time myself to look past the strange shape. Do not expect to see the machine immediately. Your eyes and mind need time to adapt so take your time and try not to think too hard of alien technology. You probably have an expectation what "technology on the Moon" may look like but this machine is unlike anything you have ever seen. In order to see it you must A) be willing to accept the impossible, B) free your mind and C) capable of "out of the box" thinking. Note: I cannot promise that you will see the alien technology. All depends on your willingness to accept that there is life outside Earth atmosphere. Only users who are fully open to extraterrestrial technology and who are able to watch this video without prejudice will have a better chance to comprehend the images.

English is not my native language, so perhaps Roc Hatfield, author of 2 books "Ancient man On the Moon" and "Moon Base Cover Up?" may have a proper description of what to expect:

"Our brains are not used to seeing Alien Technology so it might take a few minutes to see it. It is clearly a vast machine. I was able to make out a number of features after looking at it for a long time. It is made of thousands of inter-locking plates, like scales on an alligator. I believe this allows it to undulate like a snake or caterpillar. The machine is so long that it needs to flex in order to set flat on the lunar surface. If it was ridged it would be like a pencil on a basketball, both ends would be in the air when the middle was on the ground. By being flexible it can wrap it's huge length around the curvature of the Moon's surface.

The machine is a mining crawler that takes in moon material at the front using a giant gantry and processes it on board in a massive on board factory. I believe the machine can fly and has been to earth in the past. Could be the dragons seen by ancient Chinese people. It looks like a dragon from the side".

That really was a thorough description but please let me clarify something. Why do I call this machine a dragon? Because someone many centuries ago decided to called it that way. Why does it look like a dragon? Because someone many centuries ago decided that it should look that way. So is it a dragon? I do not know. If someone many centuries ago would have called it a rabbit, this machine now would be a rabbit. So, my dear friends, it is a just a name. Mr. Hatfield explained it very well why our machine looks the way it does and why it has these numeorus scales so before people start telling me that this is all fantasy watch the entire video before criticizing. Statistics show that very few really take time to watch the video. If you do not appreciate the voice, fine watch the much longer, original narrated version instead. Watching snippets of the video will only raise eyebrows as it does not show you the full story behind it. My conclusions are based on facts but they are non-scientific build and for those who decide to watch the video entirely, these viewers will understand that I did not build my theory entirely on a single gray-scale picture. I know that there are still a lot of unanswered questions for which I do not have a satisfying answer. After all I am no scientist and as I never wrote a paper in my life (probably never will) for me this personally is already some major achievement.

From ALL your comments I will create a sequel and try to give throrough explanations but I might not have an answer for every question. I am still full of questions myself.

I have no political agenda and I am only interested in the truth.


This is one of those crazy ideas someone had and in turn spent an enormous amount of time developing a film. I'm not sure what to think about this yet, I'm more intrigued about the effort they put into producing this, then the idea itself at the moment. Well to keep my standards of putting new things out there for review and not being judgmental just because I think it's crazy, here it is for you all to look at also.




posted on Sep, 1 2014 @ 01:33 PM
link   
a reply to: AnteBellum


The machine is unlike anything you have ever seen. In order to see it you must A) be willing to accept the impossible, B) free your mind and C) capable of "out of the box" thinking. Note: I cannot promise that you will see the alien technology.


Blurring your eyes might help, too. Sorry, I have seen a thingy and I did not need to do anything but gaze stupidly while my jaw hit the floor.

Their presence is unmistakable.

Those that have also been witness would agree, I think.

PS: No, I didn't watch the video.



posted on Sep, 1 2014 @ 01:41 PM
link   
a reply to: AnteBellum

I never did trust them pesky clementines - all hail the benign Satsuma



posted on Sep, 1 2014 @ 01:49 PM
link   
a reply to: AnteBellum

Oh now this is fascinating. I will spend sometime looking into this. Thanks. :-)

*goes about humming a few Imagine Dragons songs*



posted on Sep, 1 2014 @ 02:14 PM
link   
That was one impressive hour of bull# stretched so thin that it invented a new form of bull# that consists of a thin sheet of one bull#-atom's thickness.

Tremendously stupid, I heartily recommend viewing it.




posted on Sep, 1 2014 @ 02:30 PM
link   
a reply to: Bybyots

I think ATS should give out Worst Conspiracy Awards based on idea, thoroughness and presentation.
I've seen some bad ones but never one done so. . . magnificently!

Now I still think we should give this one a chance because our eyes have not fully adjusted yet. But once that happens and we can see the 1 mile high green alien under the hood of an alien machine fixing it, all will be answered then.




posted on Sep, 1 2014 @ 02:35 PM
link   
Greetings- I watched it. I dug it. I even liked the aforementioned "voice"...



posted on Sep, 1 2014 @ 02:36 PM
link   
a reply to: AnteBellum

Oh no, don't get me wrong, I watched it long enough.

I see the Golden Dragon.

I hope I get better.




posted on Sep, 1 2014 @ 02:39 PM
link   
a reply to: JimNasium

Yikes Jim, You still over there? Where thought is "real" and the physical the "illusion" ?


Jim: "Yep..."



posted on Sep, 1 2014 @ 03:00 PM
link   
a reply to: AnteBellum

I'm more intrigued about the effort they put into producing this, then the idea itself at the moment.

Yeah, me too.
I suppose that there is a little of the hope of being a "Galileo" in many of us. That hope that we can suffer our off-norm beliefs for years only to finally be found correct and then hailed as a hero or a steadfast seeker of truth.

The video is poorly done. On and on about what exactly. Conspiracy and aliens. Minute after minute of "see here, see here". See what? On and on. I gave it 10 minutes just because I wanted to see how long it would take to make it's "revelations" clear. It didn't.
And that voice over. Computer generated or what? Terrible.

Yeah, AB. What we have here is an overly zealous fellow who thinks he may have found the golden grail of proof, spends years and years proving it to himself and then spends a lot more time putting together his beliefs to awaken the rest of the world. zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz



posted on Sep, 1 2014 @ 03:35 PM
link   
a reply to: AnteBellum

The droning on about how you may not be able to see the machine, but followed up by the description of it gives it that just right creepy atmosphere i like and i think makes for great movie lines. That's just from reading the quoted parts I haven't watched the video yet.



posted on Sep, 1 2014 @ 04:07 PM
link   
a reply to: TerryMcGuire

I really want to watch this uninterrupted and completely to just make sure there isn't some ulterior motive in there some where. Normally I always do this before I post something but I've never posted something quite like this before. Geez and I thought the thread I did about Beer made with ....... yeast was over the top!


a reply to: GogoVicMorrow

Brace yourself and make sure you have extra toilet paper handy!
edit on 9/1/2014 by AnteBellum because: (no reason given)



posted on Sep, 1 2014 @ 04:58 PM
link   
So I just skipped through the whole thing watching parts......
The object, or what he calls a mining machine is 57 kilometers long 22 wide and 5.5 high.
Really? A machine of this magnitude and found on the moon no less?
Is it just me or is this theory about alien tech being on the moon a recent story?
I never heard or read of this years ago.......are the secrets slowly leaking out after all these years?



posted on Sep, 1 2014 @ 05:16 PM
link   
I watched the whole video, but honestly, I cannot agree with the whole dragon concept! I just don't see it!
In the beginning he did so well with the conspiracy and cover-up business. I really thought he may be onto something, and still do...but for goodness sakes...he gets all crazy on you! I can't help but perceive that he had a pre-conceived bias about proving dragons existed or exist and manipulated his whole theory around this.

I am not one to throw the baby out with the bath water, so to speak. I will admit that he brings up some interesting points that should be further explored, BUT his dragon theory holds no weight. Even being open minded, I attempted to see what he was seeing. His drawings over the graphics really did not help. Was there something there? Signs of chemical reactions? More likely. Chinese dragon? No way!
edit on 9 1 2014 by CynConcepts because: (no reason given)



posted on Sep, 1 2014 @ 05:25 PM
link   
a reply to: SMOKINGGUN2012

That brings up an interesting point because recently I heard through the conspiracy grapevine somewhere(if I find it I will post it) that secret US space shuttles were being flown to the moon harvesting hydrogen 4 or helium 4(can't remember which) from a base on the moon and then returning home. They were going to use it as some type of fuel for something. Now the secret space shuttle program was proven to be a fact, though we don't know what they were doing up there.

Could this be the work of some whistleblower trying not to reveal information they have to maintain anonymity?
BS stories pointing us at the moon in the hopes we find out something else, the truth?
Personally, I don't know where to begin.



posted on Sep, 1 2014 @ 05:51 PM
link   
a reply to: AnteBellum

I believe you mean Helium 3, and would you be so kind as to provide us the source on the proven fact secret space program? Not that I doubt it, I have just never seen it as a proven fact.



posted on Sep, 1 2014 @ 06:05 PM
link   
a reply to: sputniksteve

There is no proof as to what they are doing or where or when but an overwhelming amount of info into in the program itself just go look it up. My browser is going funny again like the other night, so it's not easy going back and forth between windows. This alone took me 3 tries:
Old ATS thread

Maybe I should rephrase it to military space program, but that's kinda redundant if you ask me. . .
edit on 9/1/2014 by AnteBellum because: (no reason given)



posted on Sep, 1 2014 @ 07:06 PM
link   
If Gene Siskel were here, maybe even Roger Ebert?, they'd both be grinning up at the camera and giving a:
Yeah, I know it's almost an hour long BUT the filmmaker (no relation hahaha) even colors 'the object' in with some beautiful colors.

"Yes" the voice is computer generated and that in this "common passerby's opinion" adds some intrigue to one guy's theory, is it "True" ? it is to them.

What if part of the 'graduating process' to get off Mother Earth OR "grab another body" with ZERO memory of this Life, this "now", was to "be open" to a plant on the Moon? Isn't the Moon "halfway to heaven"? Just throwing that out there..

Will the filmmaker need to make plans for The Oscars™? Probably not. Cannes?, Aspen? Comic Con? Maybe...

Way better than the one I did but I'm under 2 Ley Lines and just blew all My good orb stuff... I just wished I'd waited because now the T.V. is out for the Nats/Dodger game..


Gene:

Rog:

Sri Raj Ganesha:

ZigZag Man™ :


namaste



posted on Sep, 1 2014 @ 07:59 PM
link   

originally posted by: SMOKINGGUN2012
So I just skipped through the whole thing watching parts......
The object, or what he calls a mining machine is 57 kilometers long 22 wide and 5.5 high.
Really? A machine of this magnitude and found on the moon no less?
Is it just me or is this theory about alien tech being on the moon a recent story?
I never heard or read of this years ago.......are the secrets slowly leaking out after all these years?


After reading the comments in this thread, I decided not to view the video. That leaves me curious about one thing: does this machine leave tracks as it moves (it's pretty huge apparently) or is it broken?




posted on Sep, 1 2014 @ 08:23 PM
link   
a reply to: Snarl
Apparently, according to the video it can leave tracks. Though even the track shown on the video seems like the producer is grabbing at straws. One would think such a machine tracks would be more obvious and ascertainable. I know you may not want to watch the whole video, but one needs too, to honestly make their own judgement call. Personally, halfway through he lost me on his theories...but I admit that most disinformation released nowadays holds some merit of truth with total craziness for a deniability factor. Perhaps this video is of such a nature...the truth seems so apparent when bounced off of the insane ending, sort of thing. Lol.



new topics

top topics



 
14
<<   2 >>

log in

join