It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

What Hillary Clinton does not understand

page: 4
8
<< 1  2  3    5 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Sep, 1 2014 @ 04:16 PM
link   

originally posted by: Lyxdeslic
Pretty much everything you're posting makes no sense. I don't understand why you're grasping at trying to compare the two women.

I feel like I'm being trolled.

Ugh. For some reason that didn't quote Mike's huge paragraph.



How many times has Obama been compared to Hitler over the past six years. Across America, on the radio, on the web, on this site alone.

It usually doesn't make "sense" when it communicates directly to the subconscious.




posted on Sep, 1 2014 @ 04:18 PM
link   

originally posted by: mikegrouchy

originally posted by: Lyxdeslic
Pretty much everything you're posting makes no sense. I don't understand why you're grasping at trying to compare the two women.

I feel like I'm being trolled.

Ugh. For some reason that didn't quote Mike's huge paragraph.



How many times has Obama been compared to Hitler over the past six years. Across America, on the radio, on the web, on this site alone.

It usually doesn't make "sense" when it communicates directly to the subconscious.



How many time has every president in the history of the U.S. since Hitler became a problem have been compared to Hitler? Each one has been compared at least once. It's funny though, because I've yet to witness mass genocide in the U.S.

Hmm. Maybe I slept through it. Or was on vacation.
edit on 1-9-2014 by Lyxdeslic because: (no reason given)



posted on Sep, 1 2014 @ 04:19 PM
link   


If Hillary's handlers were up to speed she would be making a statement about why boys require privacy as well.




originally posted by: Benevolent Heretic

"BOYS"? Seriously, what did Clinton say that makes you think she values "girls'" privacy over "boys'" privacy?



Well ... since you asked. It is what she hasn't said. When is she going to show some leadership and make privacy a human issue, not just something that speaks to girls.



posted on Sep, 1 2014 @ 04:19 PM
link   
I have no idea what's going on with the OP. I think he's trying to say that looks matter for female presidential candidates or maybe that because HE thinks she looks like Eva Braun everyone else will too and thus voters will be reminded of the Holocaust... maybe? I dunno but this has gone from ridiculous to absurd to batsht crazy.



posted on Sep, 1 2014 @ 04:24 PM
link   

originally posted by: Lyxdeslic
How many time has every president in the history of the U.S. since Hitler became a problem have been compared to Hitler? Each one has been compared at least once.


Now you are getting it.

I am just getting out front of the inevitable.



posted on Sep, 1 2014 @ 04:39 PM
link   

originally posted by: mikegrouchy
When is she going to show some leadership and make privacy a human issue, not just something that speaks to girls.


When has she made privacy about "girls"???

4 days ago:

Hillayr Clinton talks NSA and privacy, data security

You do realize she hasn't even announced whether or not she's running for president, right? You know that it's over 2 YEARS until the election, right?



posted on Sep, 1 2014 @ 04:43 PM
link   
a reply to: mikegrouchy

Why not just compare her to Hitler outright then?



posted on Sep, 1 2014 @ 04:58 PM
link   

originally posted by: Kali74
a reply to: mikegrouchy

Why not just compare her to Hitler outright then?



posted on Sep, 1 2014 @ 05:53 PM
link   

originally posted by: mikegrouchy

How many times has Obama been compared to Hitler over the past six years. Across America, on the radio, on the web, on this site alone.



By who? FOX news and the Tea Party? (And their sheeple)

Yeah! I know: "Don't think of a red giraffe". "Don't think Hillary = woman".

Fortunately, I believe the majority of people who vote actually care what they're voting for. There will be a minority not voting for Hilary just because she is a woman. Just like a minority didn't vote for a Romney because he's Mormon, or Obama because he's black.

But, this is not the 50s



posted on Sep, 1 2014 @ 10:14 PM
link   

originally posted by: mikegrouchy
When is she going to show some leadership and make privacy a human issue, not just something that speaks to girls.



originally posted by: Benevolent Heretic

When has she made privacy about "girls"???

4 days ago:

Hillayr Clinton talks NSA and privacy, data security

You do realize she hasn't even announced whether or not she's running for president, right? You know that it's over 2 YEARS until the election, right?




So I click on the link and read the article. Isn't that interesting. A couple of days before the biggest hack of the cloud, that releases hundreds of celebrity nude pics across the net she says . . .



"I'm not an expert on software-defined storage or the intricacies of cloud computing," Clinton quipped.



Too much to be a coincidence, maybe? But isn't it very interesting that the Movie Sex Tape (July 18th 2014) just came out. And, that it is about this _exact_ subject.



And the responses I have been seeing across the entire internet are a bunch of drooling men, asking for links to the downloads. As a man of morals and conscience myself how can I not see this as a wedge issue. One that is manufactured, and designed to marginalize. Is this the wave she is going to ride. One where she can only rise by stepping on others?


None of this is speaking directly to men. Not men in my demographic. Not the forty-somethings. In fact the opening line of your post sounds almost shrill in my mind.


originally posted by: Benevolent Heretic

When has she made privacy about "girls"???


As far as I can tell, that is all it is about. So far.







When is she going to show us forty-something men that she is our leader too. Why is there such failure in her ability to communicate why privacy is important to us too. Why is the boogie-man (the one everyone need privacy from) always the man.



posted on Sep, 1 2014 @ 10:25 PM
link   
Life.......

Reality.......

The common man.......



Oh, yeah what you said too.



posted on Sep, 1 2014 @ 11:26 PM
link   

originally posted by: mwood
Life.......

Reality.......

The common man.......



Oh, yeah what you said too.



America .... ...
It's not a Democracy .... ...
It's not even a Republic .... ...
It is a Pornocracy, rule by Sex Scandal.


Mike Grouchy



posted on Sep, 2 2014 @ 08:03 AM
link   

originally posted by: mikegrouchy
Too much to be a coincidence, maybe? But isn't it very interesting that the Movie Sex Tape (July 18th 2014) just came out. And, that it is about this _exact_ subject.


You think Hillary Clinton has something to do with that movie?



In fact the opening line of your post sounds almost shrill in my mind.


I asked a question and it sounds "shrill"??? LOL I guess women shouldn't ask questions, lest they come across to the men as "shrill". Sorry, master. Please accept my apology for asking a question. I promise I will watch my tone in the future and only speak when spoken to. (There's more of that sarcasm!)



When is she going to show us forty-something men that she is our leader too. Why is there such failure in her ability to communicate why privacy is important to us too. Why is the boogie-man (the one everyone need privacy from) always the man.


She is not ANYONE'S leader! Quit crying! Quit blaming your sexual insecurities on Hillary Clinton, for God's sake!! You make NO sense. I'm done with this inane prattle!

After this thread, I kinda hope she DOES become president! LOL



posted on Sep, 2 2014 @ 01:11 PM
link   

originally posted by: Benevolent Heretic
I guess women shouldn't ask questions, lest they come across to the men as "shrill". Sorry, master. Please accept my apology for asking a question. I promise I will watch my tone in the future and only speak when spoken to. (There's more of that sarcasm!)



This kind of victimology language is not the way to win supporters. At least, not in my demographic. And yes, America is ruled by the threat of sex scandals weather anyone is mature enough to discuss it or not. Wasn't Sarah Palin rumored to have had an affair with Glen Rice?

So which is it going to be with Hillary. Is she the 'woman behind the man' or is she the 'woman that men stand behind.' Because I feel that everyone is tired of living under a Pornocracy.


Mike Grouchy



posted on Sep, 2 2014 @ 02:09 PM
link   

originally posted by: mikegrouchy

originally posted by: Benevolent Heretic
I guess women shouldn't ask questions, lest they come across to the men as "shrill". Sorry, master. Please accept my apology for asking a question. I promise I will watch my tone in the future and only speak when spoken to. (There's more of that sarcasm!)



This kind of victimology language is not the way to win supporters. At least, not in my demographic. And yes, America is ruled by the threat of sex scandals weather anyone is mature enough to discuss it or not. Wasn't Sarah Palin rumored to have had an affair with Glen Rice?

So which is it going to be with Hillary. Is she the 'woman behind the man' or is she the 'woman that men stand behind.' Because I feel that everyone is tired of living under a Pornocracy.


Mike Grouchy


Sensationalism "rules" only those who choose it. Apparently, you are one of those people.

I stand with the "quiet majority".



posted on Sep, 2 2014 @ 02:44 PM
link   

originally posted by: Annee

I stand with the "quiet majority".




Eva Braun was pretty quiet.

What are you saying?



posted on Sep, 2 2014 @ 03:17 PM
link   

originally posted by: mikegrouchy

originally posted by: Annee

I stand with the "quiet majority".




Eva Braun was pretty quiet.

What are you saying?





The silent majority is an unspecified large majority of people in a country or group who do not express their opinions publicly.[1] The term was popularized (though not first used) by U.S. President Richard Nixon in a November 3, 1969, speech in which he said, "And so tonight—to you, the great silent majority of my fellow Americans—I ask for your support."[2] In this usage it referred to those Americans who did not join in the large demonstrations against the Vietnam War at the time, who did not join in the counterculture, and who did not participate in public discourse. Nixon along with many others saw this group of Middle Americans as being overshadowed in the media by the more vocal minority. en.m.wikipedia.org...



posted on Sep, 2 2014 @ 03:35 PM
link   
a reply to: olaru12

Oh please! Obama got elected on a platform of "Hope! Change, and I'm not Bush!"

How complicated do you need to be?



posted on Sep, 2 2014 @ 03:39 PM
link   

originally posted by: ketsuko
a reply to: olaru12

Oh please! Obama got elected on a platform of "Hope! Change, and I'm not Bush!"

How complicated do you need to be?



It's not why I voted for him.



posted on Sep, 2 2014 @ 04:03 PM
link   

originally posted by: ketsuko
a reply to: olaru12

Oh please! Obama got elected on a platform of "Hope! Change, and I'm not Bush!"

How complicated do you need to be?




I voted for Obama, like many other people because I was weary of war. I was wrong. Obama is a neocon just like "W"
and apparently controlled by the same corporate/ industrial/ military complex. I have given up on national politics except for the entertainment value.
Hillary will be no different than any of the others but the conservatives will continue to wring their hands and whine if she gets elected. As will the dembs if perchance the GOP can pull off a miracle.

I'll continue to work for the Libertarians not for ideological reasons but they throw the best parties and attract "live and let live personalities." Ive had enough of ideological and intellectually constipated, agenda driven control freaks. And that includes the T party or any other group primarily motivated by Rush Limbaugh.

oh please indeed!

edit on 2-9-2014 by olaru12 because: (no reason given)




top topics



 
8
<< 1  2  3    5 >>

log in

join