Ebola Mutating: Sustained H2H Transmission

page: 10
70
<< 7  8  9   >>

log in

join

posted on Sep, 12 2014 @ 10:20 PM
link   

originally posted by: soficrow
All true - but the risk of doing nothing -or not enough- is way too high.


Indeed.

For those interested, I've updated the Ebola charts in the charts thread with the latest WHO numbers released September 12, 2014 (covering through August 7, 2014). They are split over 5 posts in the thread because there are so many now. Here is a link to the first of the 5 posts:

Updated Ebola Charts




posted on Sep, 13 2014 @ 01:54 AM
link   
a reply to: ikonoklast

Latest figures from who ARE : WHO Ebola Presser Friday Sept 12 4784 Cases 2400 Deaths
fluboard.rhizalabs.com...

How close to your charts are these latest figures ?



posted on Sep, 13 2014 @ 02:07 AM
link   
a reply to: Semicollegiate

You're not telling me anything I don't already know, in fact I was taking about that in my earliest posts and show how that is actually a very bad thing.

Lower mortality rate coupled with a highest transmission rate equals a harder outbreak to deal with as it will last longer, spread faster, and not be as responsive to treatment.

A point I made a few pages ago I think bears repeating, the more complex the DNA the viris interacts with, the greater the mutation rate. Now put that together with an exponential growth rate, and you tell me where are headed.



posted on Sep, 13 2014 @ 02:17 AM
link   
a reply to: 727Sky

The news has been reporting that the WHO said this in a press conference or speech somewhere, but the detailed numbers they released on Friday, September 12, 2014 obviously didn't cover the same dates. The detailed data they released on the 12th stated 4390 cases and 2226 deaths through September 7th.

It's a bit frustrating that the WHO announces more recent numbers in press conferences than they publish in their detailed updates, but the new numbers will probably be in an upcoming update.



posted on Sep, 13 2014 @ 08:21 AM
link   
a reply to: ikonoklast

The WHO obviously is behind on the paperwork, but still needs to work the campaign. The trick is to balance promoting hope while communicating urgency and dire need. Unfortunately, public health got outflanked by the military-industrial complex.

Have you seen this?




posted on Sep, 13 2014 @ 10:45 AM
link   

originally posted by: soficrow
a reply to: ikonoklast

The WHO obviously is behind on the paperwork, but still needs to work the campaign. The trick is to balance promoting hope while communicating urgency and dire need. Unfortunately, public health got outflanked by the military-industrial complex.

Have you seen this?




Yes, thanks. I did a comparison of the projections that MIDAS did for the US National Institutes of Health (NIH) and the US Department of Defense (DoD) on a logarithmic scale (so the curves are exponential lines) over in the charts thread:





The red lines represent their 3 different scenarios. The blue lines represent my most current projection scenarios for the same time frame from chart 4B and the green shaded area is the projection range for the same time period from my chart 4.

From: Comparison of MIDAS projections and my projections

I think you are right that WHO and the CDC just got 'outed' by the NIH and the DoD, since the New York Times article let it slip that the MIDAS study for the NIH and the DoD projects such a huge increase in cases by October 12, 2014 and hundreds of thousands of cases over the next 12 to 18 months. The NY Times article notes that the CDC declined comment...



posted on Sep, 13 2014 @ 06:00 PM
link   
a reply to: ikonoklast

When I said "public health got outflanked by the military-industrial complex" I meant the Big Boyz decided there was more profit to be made in war than in protecting public health.



posted on Sep, 14 2014 @ 12:15 AM
link   

originally posted by: soficrow
a reply to: ikonoklast

When I said "public health got outflanked by the military-industrial complex" I meant the Big Boyz decided there was more profit to be made in war than in protecting public health.


Oh... do you mean the military got the budget money and attention for the new war/'it's not a war it's a large anti-terrorism operation' against ISIS/ISIL/IS? Or do you mean you think the military wants to weaponize Ebola rather than treat it? Or both? Or something else?



posted on Sep, 14 2014 @ 12:41 AM
link   


The researchers, previously committed to secrecy and confidentiality - to profit, protecting Intellectual Property Rights and respecting corporate and military Confidentiality Agreements - now have released their sequencing information into the public domain as 'Open Access" scientific information. They are calling for the global scientific community to participate in crowd-sourcing


Perhaps this has been asked and answered: Why did this not happen in the beginning of the spread of Ebola?

This should have taken place when the doctor and nurse were infected and flown to Emory....

I'm not sure what we can do to help hopefully at this point. Maybe we can come up with a preventive mesure or figure out how to shut this thing down!

Psx
edit on 9/14/2014 by paxnatus because: (no reason given)



posted on Sep, 14 2014 @ 02:50 PM
link   

originally posted by: ikonoklast

originally posted by: soficrow
a reply to: ikonoklast

When I said "public health got outflanked by the military-industrial complex" I meant the Big Boyz decided there was more profit to be made in war than in protecting public health.


Oh... do you mean the military got the budget money and attention for the new war/'it's not a war it's a large anti-terrorism operation' against ISIS/ISIL/IS? Or do you mean you think the military wants to weaponize Ebola rather than treat it? Or both? Or something else?


The military got the budget money and attention for the new war that's not a war.

....Not that strategies don't overlap, dovetail and/or mesh with opportunities.



posted on Sep, 15 2014 @ 08:46 PM
link   
My boy Sofi this situation is spinning out of control my friend lets be realistic it was set up as a test run that has back fired as a nuke... Now I am not a Pessimistic person but reality of life is that we need to brace for impact

investmentwatchblog.com..." target="_blank" class="postlink" rel="nofollow">http...://investmentwatchblog.com/breaking-us-state-dept-orders-160000-hazmat-suits-for-ebola/

http://______beforeitsnews/survival/2014/08/us-ebola-fema-camps-fema-coffins-ebola-exec-order-massive-drills-its-beginning-to-add-up-2533566 .html



a reply to: soficrow



posted on Sep, 15 2014 @ 10:16 PM
link   

originally posted by: ATF1886
My boy Sofi this situation is spinning out of control my friend lets be realistic it was set up as a test run that has back fired as a nuke... Now I am not a Pessimistic person but reality of life is that we need to brace for impact

investmentwatchblog.com..." target="_blank" class="postlink" rel="nofollow">http...://investmentwatchblog.com/breaking-us-state-dept-orders-160000-hazmat-suits-for-ebola/

http://______beforeitsnews/survival/2014/08/us-ebola-fema-camps-fema-coffins-ebola-exec-order-massive-drills-its-beginning-to-add-up-2533566 .html



a reply to: soficrow



Soficrow is female and both your links are jacked up. Inoperable. Nada. Not that BIN is reputable anyhow, but I do find it interesting to hop on over there from time to time.



posted on Sep, 16 2014 @ 07:53 AM
link   
a reply to: ATF1886

Sorry friend, can't open your links. Can you fix?

Your girl, sofi






new topics
top topics
 
70
<< 7  8  9   >>

log in

join