a reply to: theunredacted
(Am I allowed to "reply" to this posting,
or was this posting "off-topic" to begin with.) ??
(Knowing that this person was a "COPYcat" killer/letter-writer,
it can be "linked", in that way, as well.)
And by the way, this is only to say that, this is a "possibility":
"bloody piece of shirt TAIL",
was sent in shortly after.
Could it be "possible", that this had to do with,
this line, from the Jack the Ripper case:
"bloody piece of apron" (cut from apron that was thought to have belonged to victim)
was found shortly after.
[He would have a pretty hard time, finding a woman who was wearing an "apron".]
Is that where the shirt TAIL,
comes in at.
And "why" send that in, when:
He could have just as easily did what he did before ("to prove") he did a case:
What type of gun was used.
What type of ammo was used.
Where the victim's head was at.
Description of clothes victim was wearing.
[Which, by the way:
Looked amazingly similar to, what a
Police detective's crime-scene investigation report might look like.]
[What's the deal?
I mean, did he now (not have "access" to crime scene investigation reports,
like he "may" have had, in regard to Vallejo cases?)]
"Why" did he cut off a piece of victim's shirt tail,
and send it in, to begin with.
(Why did he feel the "need" to do that.)
(Or rather, "why" did he HAVE to do that, or think he HAD to do that),
in order to "prove", he did that case?
Or, did he do that, for some "other" reason.
(Besides just, 'proving', he did that case.)
(That is, "if" it WAS actually the killer of the cab driver, who cut that piece of shirt tail off. It was then sent in, with a letter.) (And assuming
that the letter-writer was actually the killer, in these cases.) (The killer, in 'all' of, the cases.)
(As a note: I am not one who normally believes in "conspiracy theories."
I also have to keep in mind that:
Knowing that he was a "COPYcat" killer/letter-writer, knowing what cases he was COPYcatting
(and THOSE cases, commonly have a "conspiracy theory" (by some) attached to them),
it wouldn't be surprising to me if: He "tried" to get you to "believe", that one, too.
(i.e. Trying to "copycat" THAT element, too.)
"Jack the Ripper sent letters, poems, and ciphers. He gave clues to his identity."
[In his "letter" that he sent, in which he included "cipher".
And stated: "In this cipher, is my identity."]
* The person is "READING" this stuff. (Using it as a GUIDEBOOK.)
(Some peoples' "theory": "Maybe he was trying to draw something on the map.) (referring to, "invisible geometry")
He sent in: a "map", and he "drew" on it. (put the symbol that he used, on it.)
And surely he also came across the stated "conspiracy theories" (that people have a hard time dodging, when trying to "read" about the actual cases.)
(Jack the Ripper) (JFK Assassination case.)
And then there was this, that you "commonly" see:
"Jack the Ripper may have been a mason."
"JFK may have been killed by masons and some police."
(So don't be surprised, if he 'tried' to include that type of "element" too, somewhere within his case.)
Because he was a "COPYcat".
[This is a "FACT".
Now maybe this will "help" you (all of you), and police, in trying to find out "who" this guy was.]
But I am not going to post any more.
(I have shared that info. with you.
Now I will sit "quietly", and just read the statements made by others, and see if I can find any "food for thought" info.)
Thank you for your time,
and I was only trying to "help".
(And on the flip-side of that, can't you understand that:
Until others can also see, that this guy was (in fact) a COPYcat killer,
how can I get any "help" in trying to find out "who" he was.
Of course, I am at a stand-still anyway, because noone knows "who" this guy was - anyway.)
Anyway, I provided the info. to police and FBI. (I did what I should have done/was supposed to do.)
And now it is, out of my hands.
THEY will have to find out who this COPYcat killer/letter-writer was. (That is their job. Not mine.)
But I am just letting you know that, he WAS a COPYcat killer/letter-writer.
(That is a "FACT".)
In regard to your own research, you might want to, "take another look".
[It could be possible that FBI and police were already aware, that this guy was doing COPYcat.
"If" that was the case, they sure were not going to tell you or the rest of the "public" about it.
I highly doubt they would have put THAT in the newspaper back then. (Jack the Ripper "COPYcatter" on the loose.) As for him, it could be possible that
he was "hoping" they would put that in the newspaper.]
edit on 2-8-2015 by Billie2 because: added more info.