It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Not very propable, difference in mass is like between car and train.
Originally posted by ChrisRT
Something else to think about or and factor in is Neptune tilted orbit. It had to have collided with a massive object in the past and Pluto and Charon could have been that objects, or Neptune moon...
Originally posted by SpookyVince
Also, it doesn't seem that other planets come to a strange behavior in that software (winstars, that is) unless maybe someone is patient enough to try it to years up to 12,000 or more...
Originally posted by UofCinLA
The analytical theory of Pluto's orbit is only accurate for
about ±150 years around 1950, so outside that range to avoid
displaying incorrect values, it isn't displayed at all.
Note that Pluto was only discovered in 1930 and with an
orbital period of 248 years has been observed over only a
fraction of its orbit.
Originally posted by St Udio
i was actually going to submit that thought,
also that Pluto, being recently tracked/discovered...scientists aren't
certain if it is a 'excaped' moon? or a KBO KuiperBeltObject?
Originally posted by llama009
a little off topic, but i saw on a tv show (for little kids) that pluto and its moon share what there is of their atmosphere.
Is this a known fact or were the show's creators lying to kiddies