It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.


Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.


HIGH ALERT: Homeland Security/FBI issue a warning to U.S. police urging them to be vigilant to poten

page: 2
<< 1    3  4  5 >>

log in


posted on Aug, 22 2014 @ 04:25 PM
a reply to: BornAgainAlien

They don`t need to create a false flag, that`s why they have left the border unsecured,so that real terrorist can get in easily and create a real attcak.

posted on Aug, 22 2014 @ 04:25 PM
a reply to: Osiris1953

Anyone committing a terrorist attack in the U.S could claim to be ISIS. They don't keep a membership list.

posted on Aug, 22 2014 @ 04:26 PM
"Any society that would give up a little liberty to gain a little security will deserve neither and lose both"

- Benjamin Franklin.

I think they are pushing for the people to become scared, angry, and stupid. Create chaos and fear to gain total control. They will build walls and fences to surround the people of America for the purpose of protection. Then the people of America will see the prison they built around themselves.

"It is better to die on your feet than live on your knees."

- Emiliano Zapata
edit on E14America/Chicago08438 by Eyemin because: (no reason given)

posted on Aug, 22 2014 @ 04:27 PM
a reply to: EA006

Good point.

I guess it would depend on the goals of the individual terrorist whether that would be to their benefit.

Again, very good point.

(post by solarstorm removed for a serious terms and conditions violation)

posted on Aug, 22 2014 @ 04:28 PM
a reply to: mOjOm

National pride would be hurt if America did nothing after a massive attack on ANY city.

posted on Aug, 22 2014 @ 04:29 PM
a reply to: Eyemin

And some will sure think twice about calling for the demilitarization of LEOs if the boogie man comes home again.

posted on Aug, 22 2014 @ 04:34 PM
a reply to: kosmicjack

Martial law will become the "norm".

posted on Aug, 22 2014 @ 04:36 PM

originally posted by: xuenchen
Does this mean they will be guarding the borders better ?

Should'a thought of that before !!

I think we are being set up.

What about all those "Sanctuary" Cities now ?

Will ISIS immigrants still get a "Pass" ?

I doubt we will see an increase in border security from this administration. I agree we are being set up, not by foreign terrorists, but by this administration and others in Washington. The signs have been there for all to see, however, we allowed ourselves to be hood-winked into believing we were just being paranoid.

The fact is we don't know WHO has crossed out southern border, and this administration has no intention in securing this border. ISIS, or whatever they call themselves, is most likely here already. Until something bad happens, some will deny anything could be in the works. Just have to wait and see. God help us all.

posted on Aug, 22 2014 @ 04:38 PM
There is a real shift in thinking about issues pertaining to the US lately. I'm curious as to what DHS could possibly be looking for though.

A comprehensive 2009 demographic study of 232 countries and territories reported that 23% of the global population, or 1.57 billion people, are Muslims. Of those, it is estimated over 75–90% are Sunni and 10–20% are Shia with a small minority belonging to other sects. Approximately 57 countries are Muslim-majority, and Arabs account for around 20% of all Muslims worldwide. The number of Muslims worldwide increased from Between 200 million in 1900 to 551 million in 1970, and tripled to 1.57 billion by 2009.

They are kidding themselves if they think they can isolate any certain demographic to better protect against the threat. These people could look like anyone. Obviously not all Muslims are radical Islamic followers, but to say that an Arabic person is more likely to be a threat is false.

Islam demographics

posted on Aug, 22 2014 @ 04:41 PM
a reply to: kosmicjack

The boogie man never left...

posted on Aug, 22 2014 @ 04:43 PM
a reply to: elitelogic

Cause they can just fly over?
I mean we can 'secure' the border all day but what is that going to do to prevent them from getting fake documentation?
Or not even fake documentation but real passports?

If they are so well funded and organized, why would they take the way that chances them getting caught?

posted on Aug, 22 2014 @ 04:44 PM
a reply to: Sremmos80

Did I say the two paths to entry were mutually exclusive?

posted on Aug, 22 2014 @ 04:45 PM
a reply to: retiredTxn

Where is everyone getting the idea that IS has infiltrated this country through the border with Mexico? The article does not state that IS has infiltrated, the bulletin is concerning people who sympathize with IS and for LEO to be aware of this fact.

THAT is the problem. I am more concerned with the homegrown brand of terrorist. They can go to any store, buy some black powder and....boom....see ya in heaven.

Again, there is nothing that I read in the article that stated terrorists crossed the Mexican border.

posted on Aug, 22 2014 @ 04:46 PM

originally posted by: Stormdancer777
a reply to: LeatherNLace

Photo implies ISIS threat to Chicago

My guess is many,with the help of the POTUS

I saw that article yesterday and it gave me chills...

I work high up in the Hancock building, which is just a few blocks down Michigan Ave from the building pictured in the tweet.

Then today, I heard a guy checking in with security on the 44th floor say he was Secret Service. Then another, and another....

It took a bit of convincing, but I got one of the staff to let me know what was going on...

Apparently Vice President Joe Biden is in the building right now.

Yeah... I'm ready to go home.

edit on 22-8-2014 by Aqualung2012 because: (no reason given)

posted on Aug, 22 2014 @ 04:48 PM
a reply to: EA006

It also made me wonder if the bankrupt slum cities may be the target, that's if its all planned already.

Could be.

Perhaps they see it as one way to obtain sustainable development.

Think of the massive re-building projects after mass-destruction.

Agenda 21 comes to mind.

posted on Aug, 22 2014 @ 04:58 PM
a reply to: xuenchen

Would depend on the attack. If it's nuclear, no-ones Rebuilding.

posted on Aug, 22 2014 @ 05:00 PM
What I don't understand is media reports of "1000s" of ISIS/ISIL/IS members from U.S. and Europe, supposedly they don't need visas to travel.

Okay...but then we should know exactly who they are, right? I mean, with all of the over-the-top NSA surveillance -surely they should not be able to get back into country to do any harm or should be monitored within their country?

Otherwise, fail. And give us all of our funding back.

edit on 8/22/2014 by kosmicjack because: (no reason given)

posted on Aug, 22 2014 @ 05:01 PM

originally posted by: Feltrick
a reply to: retiredTxn

Again, there is nothing that I read in the article that stated terrorists crossed the Mexican border.

It doesn't say that, though it should. One cannot say it's just as easy to cross into America by plane, rather than coming through our southern border. Someone could easily drive across the border with any number of weapons. Biological, chemical, or any other combination. Hit YouTube and you will find many instances of trucks crossing without scrutiny. One lucky truck is all it takes. Or a group of folks can walk into our country. Much easier than being scrutinized by ICE and all the other security at airports. IMO.

posted on Aug, 22 2014 @ 05:02 PM
I'm just curious. How can one be vigilante in this case without racial profiling?

new topics

top topics

<< 1    3  4  5 >>

log in