It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: jrod
a reply to: Power_Semi
The same 'doctors' who will tell you that cannabis oil will not work or the same ones that told you Vioxx and other bad medicine that has been recalled is perfectly safe.
There are too many inept doctors who are nothing but peons for Big Pharma. The evidence for many medicinal uses of the plant is overwhelming.
originally posted by: alienDNA
a reply to: Baddogma
its illegal for a reason man. A damned good one.
Granted it has various health benefits. Which is why it is LEGAL as medicine in parts of the world.
But as a streetdrug, dont take it lightly.
you can use it for 1 year... 2 years.. everything is fine.. 3 years.. fine.
then BAM.
irreversible mental issues. Worth it? Not sure.
People glorify weed too much. Its not as safe as people think. Just cause youve had the luck of being perfectly fine, dont mean others hasnt had the bad luck of going down the psychiatric rabbit-hole.
originally posted by: alienDNA
a reply to: Baddogma
As you said. People are gonna use drugs. No denying that.
All Im saying is that many people seem to think cannabis is perfectly safe, and that there is no reason it should be illegal.
Well you know what?
Cocaine and Heroin are actually completely non-toxic to the system in sporadic and non day-to-day usage.
Just as cannabis is.
But use it regularily and it WILL cause problems. Just like cannabis.
Im not saying Cannabis is worse or better than any other drug.
Im saying it is JUST like any other drug.
It might not have any toxic effects like alcohol - but it DO have psychological side-effects like for example acid.
Its not all-round safe, and its not a completely whack idea to have it being illegal.
originally posted by: knightsofcydonia
Here is a research report from the American Chemical Society.
www.sciencedaily.com...
"Source:
American Chemical Society
Summary:
Here's another reason to "keep off the grass." Researchers report that marijuana smoke contains significantly higher levels of several toxic compounds -- including ammonia and hydrogen cyanide -- than tobacco smoke and may therefore pose similar health risks. The scientists found that ammonia levels were 20 times higher in the marijuana smoke than in the tobacco smoke, while hydrogen cyanide, nitric oxide and certain aromatic amines occurred at levels 3-5 times higher in the marijuana smoke, they say."
Also, regarding dependency & addiction:
"Although some people question the conceptof marijuana dependence or addiction, diagnostic, epidemiological, laboratory,and clinical studies clearly indicate that the condition exists, is important, andcauses harm (Budney, 2006; Budney and Hughes, 2006; Copeland, 2004; Roffmanand Stephens, 2006)."
archives.drugabuse.gov...
Source
Thus, despite potentially higher levels of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons found in cannabis smoke compared to tobacco smoke (dependent on what part of the plant is smoked), the THC present in cannabis smoke should exert a protective effect against pro-carcinogens that require activation. In contrast, nicotine activates some CYP1A1 activities, thus potentially increasing the carcinogenic effects of tobacco smoke [24].
In conclusion, while both tobacco and cannabis smoke have similar properties chemically, their pharmacological activities differ greatly. Components of cannabis smoke minimize some carcinogenic pathways whereas tobacco smoke enhances some. Both types of smoke contain carcinogens and particulate matter that promotes inflammatory immune responses that may enhance the carcinogenic effects of the smoke. However, cannabis typically down-regulates immunologically-generated free radical production by promoting a Th2 immune cytokine profile. Furthermore, THC inhibits the enzyme necessary to activate some of the carcinogens found in smoke. In contrast, tobacco smoke increases the likelihood of carcinogenesis by overcoming normal cellular checkpoint protective mechanisms through the activity of respiratory epithelial cell nicotine receptors. Cannabinoids receptors have not been reported in respiratory epithelial cells (in skin they prevent cancer), and hence the DNA damage checkpoint mechanism should remain intact after prolonged cannabis exposure. Furthermore, nicotine promotes tumor angiogenesis whereas cannabis inhibits it. It is possible that as the cannabis-consuming population ages, the long-term consequences of smoking cannabis may become more similar to what is observed with tobacco. However, current knowledge does not suggest that cannabis smoke will have a carcinogenic potential comparable to that resulting from exposure to tobacco smoke.