It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: ArchPlayer
a reply to: Expat888
The rules have been changed. If you have one direct connective parent going back 10 generations, they got you. Its law as of last year.
linklinkE-
Home » News
State Department Puts Biometric Chips in U.S. Passports
July 10, 2013 - 2:29 PM
By Penny Starr
State Department Voluntarily Puts Biometric Chips in Passports of U.S. Citizens
U.S. passport with the biometric integrated circuit. (AP)
(CNSNews.com) – Since 2002, the federal government has required foreigners entering the United States through the State Department’s Visa Waiver Program to have a biometric integrated circuit in their passport. But the State Department itself extended that requirement in 2007 to cover U.S. passports issued to U.S. citizens.
When asked by CNSNews.com why the decision was made to include biometric chips in the passports of U.S. citizens, it was referred to the department website’s Frequently Asked Questions about electronic passports.
According to the website, the Enhanced Border Security and Visa Entry Reform Act of 2002 required foreigners participating in the Visa Waiver Program--which permits entry into the United States without a VISA for a limited period of time--to have these integrated circuits or chips on their passport.
“The chip securely stores the same data visually displayed on the photo pages of the passport, and additionally includes a digital photograph,” the website reports.
The website notes that “previously issued” passports without chips can still be used for travel, with the exception of VWP travelers. But a U.S. citizen cannot obtain a new passport now without a chip.
originally posted by: ArchPlayer
a reply to: BasementWarriorKryptonite
That is not true. The IRS can find you based on digital exchange now. It is not the 1970s - with the digital world, when you leave your passport is scanned FIRST. They know you gone. From there, they find out where you are at. Then if you are working overseas, they got their hand into your pockets, and will send your file to the special division that handles expatriates.
originally posted by: BasementWarriorKryptonite
a reply to: DJW001
It doesn't seem so long ago - actually, it wasn't that long ago - that to be an American citizen was like being a Roman citizen way back when it meant you were almost untouchable and so, so lucky.
I'm sure I'm not the only one who's head is spinning with how fast that all unravelled. It's just...bewildering. How? How did it happen?
Can anyone even say when it happened - it just sort of crept up on everyone.
originally posted by: MichiganSwampBuck
From what I have read, it is really hard to renounce your citizenship in the U.S.
If they get around to securing the borders, it will probably be to keep the citizens in, not illegals out.
originally posted by: ArchPlayer
a reply to: BasementWarriorKryptonite
Throw up a little more. Repost: America has tax treaties with over 42 countries where the IRS and the foreign tax agencies exchange tax data on their residents. This is exactly why other countries just don't want to deal with America anymore.
US anti-tax evasion legislation known as FATCA – the Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act – has caused upheaval among the American expat community and dual Swiss-US nationals living in Switzerland where it was agreed in February.
“People are very angry and upset but some are really scared,” declared Jackie Bugnion, a director and tax specialist at American Citizens Abroad (ACA), a Swiss-based organisation that calls itself “The voice of Americans overseas”.
Alongside Eritrea, the United States is unique in requiring its overseas citizens – estimated to be around six million according to US State Department figures – to pay taxes.
At the individual level, on top of filing their annual tax return, a US citizen also needs to send the IRS a special form detailing their foreign assets if over a certain amount. This is in addition to FATCA’s older cousin Fbar – the Foreign Bank and Financial Accounts report – for anyone with savings of more than $10,000 abroad, which has to be filed each year.
Neither Hornung-Soukup nor Ungar’s case is unique or even rare. According to the Geneva-based expatriate advocacy group, American Citizens Abroad (ACA), which follows this issue closely, increasing numbers of US nationals in Switzerland are being denied banking services. However, according to ACA tax director Jackie Bugnon, the banks may not be totally to blame since they are “held hostage to US policies,” which require opening of American-held accounts to the scrutiny of the Internal Revenue Service (IRS).
The backlash against US clients has been building up since 2008, with the news that Switzerland’s largest financial institution, UBS, helped wealthy Americans hide billions of dollars in undisclosed offshore accounts to evade taxes. The bank had to pay a $780 million fine and release the names of 250 suspected American tax dodgers. In recent years, however, Swiss banks have stepped up their efforts to curb the flow of undeclared money from the U.S. and elsewhere.
The United States is the only developed country (the other one is Eritrea) that taxes its citizens who live overseas, even if their income is generated in a foreign country and they live abroad permanently. Due to the financial burden of double taxation – by their country of residence and the U.S.–growing numbers of US citizens take the drastic step of relinquishing their American nationality. This year, nearly 2,400 expatriates have given up their U.S. citizenship or turned in their green cards.