posted on Aug, 22 2014 @ 06:32 PM
a reply to: wmd_2008
So nasa's scanning technology is so poor it make's it fail, Look I worked an old mass spectrometer and have done my share of darkroom photo
processing too, you are clever with your wording but I am afraid it is you who does not have a clue on this point, you know those algorythm's used to
need a maiframe to run them and where used to analyse spy satellite data of the soviet union to detect what they were up to as well as proxy war
zone's, this first generation of the program was above 95 percent accurate at detecting artificial structure's made to look natural that they human
eye could not detect, you know what else today's pc's can probably run it (though slowly) and it has moved on several generations since then so is
undoubtedly far more accurate.
Here is another interesting point, they discovered it was so good it was finding archeaological site's as well here on earth, this leaked out but
was never confirmed for obvious reason's, what it detected on the moon and apparently on mars when they ran the algorythm was not a glytch either,
try lot's of ruin's and not a few but in extreme state's of deterioration or extremely well concealed.