There is a lot of talk about bull# these days and some seem to think that we have achieved a new level of it.
But have we?
“Thet there is some bull#.”, it's a simple phrase that is roughly analagous to the British “That's a load of old bollocks”, or the Swahili
“Unatombwa na farasi!”, It means an extra layer of crap added to the hearty helping of doo doo that life already dishes out all by itslef, with no
assistance from anyone.
Like #-icing on a #-cake, that's what bull# is and, Ironiclly enough, the easiest way to get a quick list of the different flavors of #-icing is to
look at the American Bill of Rights. Surely, the guys that wrote that up were thoroughly schooled in bull#, and had tried to enumerate its ways so
that the bull#-tide could be turned.
We can see that bull# is a known entity: it has been identified. People know bull# when they see it because bull# has always been bull# for as long as
man has cried out for justice, and even if they have never seen that particular form of bull# before, they had some relative that had seen it and had
informed the young ones; like with The Great Depression, or disco.
And so this is how bull# became known as “The same 'ol bull#”, which is the true name of bull#, as bull# travels in a loop
; a continuous
loop from the time of ancient Gilgamesh.
In order to be able to say that we have achieved some mythical “next level of bull#”, one would have to believe that there is some heirarchy of
bull#: some tower of bull# with higher and higher levels to be attained, but there is not. We know that there is only “the same 'ol bull#”.
This feeling of upward momentum, of moving from one level to another, has been falsely created by how our networks have worked as a sort of
bull#-acceleratror. Not only are there just simply more eyes on the bull# and more voices with the ability to quickly “tweet” about it, the
bull#ters themselves have co-opted the medium for the dissemenation of custom-made designer-bull#. But it's still “the same 'ol bull#”.
This intensification of the bull#-signal is not
an indication of movement from our current level of bull# to another, it is just an
intensification of “the same 'ol bull#” within the same old bull#-loop. In fact, where we have found ourselves is trapped in a Strange Bull#
A strange loop, technically called tangled hierarchy consciousness, arises when, by moving only upwards or downwards through a hierarchical system,
one finds oneself back where one started.
Strange (Bull#) Loop
That's all we are collectively and as a whole: a tangled mass of self-referencing relationships that give the illusion of several thousands of years
of progress; it's a closed loop, and it is very strange indeed. We are able to figure out all sorts of difficult engineering problems but when it come
to figuring out ourselves it's anyone's best guess; ergo the bull#.
See here's the deal: nobody knows what the hell is going on, so that pretty much eradicates the possiblity of us having achieved some “next level”
of bull# because that would mean that someone would have figured out the old bull# and that's how we can tell it's just “the same 'ol bull#”.
And so I challenge this idea of there being a “next level of bull#”, or any real heirarchy of bull# at all. It's just “the same 'ol bull#,
edit on 21-8-2014 by Bybyots because: . : .