a reply to: Iamthatbish
Okay... hard to explain but i'll give it a go.
Let's take 2 fictional populations
The first, 20 people 10 male and 10 Female, 4 are Asian, 4 African, 4 Caucasian, 4 Middle Eastern and 4 Pacific Islanders, they all remain together as
a tribe on an island and inter marry as couples irregardless of race.
The second, all Caucasian 10 males, 10 females but they break themselves up onto 5 nearby Islands, 2 couples on each...
The children of group one INITIALLY have a greater genetic variance, but after many generations become a singular stagnant gene pool, the face the
same challenges, the same environment, the same traits are exemplified no new genetics develop, eventually you have a tan group of people... a new
singular race so to speak with very little genetic variance...
Group 2 starting out as a singular race, but isolated on five islands, each group faces different challenges, has different environment and pursues
over time entirely different cultural norms... on one island let's say the only habitat is caves....they become whiter, almost albino... on another
island there is a particular fruit that expresses a gene that leads to a bluish skin tone on yet another there is a predator that only a select few
can out run and they develop longer legs... etc, etc...
via isolation, over time you get 5 completely distinct genomes, 5 races so to speak, given a long enough time maybe even 5 species...
Group One, is genetically doomed, think of their island as a planet... when an "ebola" comes along that affects One of them, they will all die,
likewise there is an aspect to the male chromosome that doesn't allow for repair so over time... without the introduction of novel genetics from
another population the deficits to the male genetics will pile up dooming the species... from multiple directions the singular population is "long
term" destined to die off...
Group 2 however, will develop multiple genetic populations, they have the capacity to introduce novel genetics back to one another, when an ebola type
virus strikes separate group 3 and 4 will survive maybe...
Let's use Aids as an example...
There is a genetic population of Europeans immune to the disease due to a mutation that flourished because of Bubonic Plauge... if Aids were to mutate
into an airborne disease in X number of years what we would have left would be some Europeans (and Chinese) who were immune.... Now make the entire
world "multi cultural" imagine there are no more Chinese and Europeans... everybody dies as these rare genetics get quashed
Now don't get me wrong
"Multiculturalism" so to speak is a much needed part of the process, the introduction of novel genes is a mandatory
BUT the creation of Novel genes via interbreeding and isolated population groups is equally as important
what i'm saying is BOTH are necessary for a species to survive. The implications of American Multiculturalism on a global scale would be a reduction
of genetic material.
This goes back to my first post... 100,000 years ago "humanity" was NOT the most inbred mammal on the planet, there were not 4-5 "races" but
rather 4-5 nearly distinct Species each having many tribes/races in varying locations, today we have far less Hominid diversity and are in fact well
over the edge on the road to genetic extinction already...
In reality, what we call "race" barely even exists by genetic standards we share more genes between an African and European than any two breeds of
dog do for example... we are already prone to a vast variety of diseases and genetic disorders because of this, one could actually say that a large
portion of us only survive to adult hood already only because of modern science we are that genetically Fubar
We need the "specialization" of genetics to survive as a species long term and as we face globalism this is vanishing fast, we need to allow some
places to remain Germany, Japan, Russia and the places that are a bit xenophobic to remain as is... in addition to what we do or we wont survive, what
we are doing with pushing a "global" philosophy of multiculturalism is EQUALLY as bad as what the powers of WW2 did in regards to singular race
dominance... the end result would be the same, BOTH philosophies are needed from a genetic perspective and "Global" multiculturalism is also a dead
In short... you can't let the Germans conquer the world but you can't interbreed them out of existence either... if you just look at the loss of
tribalism in the last century... we have half doomed our species as it is just by their integration
It's just Balance, the Tao is... there is no Tao
What we call "diversity" in America is actually the death of specialization, inbreeding on a larger scale and the destruction of culture which in
the end is the key to actual "diversity" there are no "Blue" people in the Great Beige Race
Genetically we have no choice but to learn to "Tolerate" people being "Korean" or "Amish" or what have you even if they don't like Gays or
Blacks etc, etc it might be "intellectually" correct to accept people of all races and creeds ( I agree with that ) BUT your in a genetic doomsday
without specialization of genes, there is no actual genetic diversity without that end of the spectrum and like all debates it's a circle not a line
with extremism meeting on both sides