It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: GoOfYFoOt
In all sincerity, can you cite a time when you encountered evidence contrary to mainstream beliefs that swayed your opinion of that belief? Please provide specifics...
originally posted by: GoOfYFoOt
a reply to: Krazysh0t
Full Scale Ark
Just as the first storms of winter roll in, Dutchman Johan Huibers has finished his 20-year quest to build a full-scale, functioning model of Noah's Ark — an undertaking of, well, biblical proportions.
originally posted by: TzarChasm
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
originally posted by: TzarChasm
a reply to: Krazysh0t
at what point will you be convinced that this is a futile discussion? neither of you is going to budge. whats the sense in pursuing this.
Well as an agnostic, I allow for any possibility to be true. So I will always entertain evidence if it is provided and is credible. Though always expect me to be overly critical of evidence for ideas and theories that aren't "mainstream" so to speak. Most of the time that evidence is faulty.
and do you really think you will find anything in this thread that turns your beliefs and convictions on their heads? this is page 19 of what im sure isnt even your first thread concerning global floods. if it was gonna happen, it would have happened by now. so whats the game here?
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
originally posted by: TzarChasm
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
originally posted by: TzarChasm
a reply to: Krazysh0t
at what point will you be convinced that this is a futile discussion? neither of you is going to budge. whats the sense in pursuing this.
Well as an agnostic, I allow for any possibility to be true. So I will always entertain evidence if it is provided and is credible. Though always expect me to be overly critical of evidence for ideas and theories that aren't "mainstream" so to speak. Most of the time that evidence is faulty.
and do you really think you will find anything in this thread that turns your beliefs and convictions on their heads? this is page 19 of what im sure isnt even your first thread concerning global floods. if it was gonna happen, it would have happened by now. so whats the game here?
I like the debate, and just because evidence surfacing against my ideas is unlikely, doesn't mean that I shouldn't pursue it. If I close my ears to the participants in this thread and write it off, I won't be able to see any good evidence posted. Just because I doubt that it exists, doesn't mean that it doesn't exist. How else would you suggest I keep an open mind?
At least in this thread there is more than one person debating the topic, unlike this thread which just has one person repeating the same nonsense over and over again. I've pretty much abandoned that thread.
originally posted by: TzarChasm
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
originally posted by: TzarChasm
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
originally posted by: TzarChasm
a reply to: Krazysh0t
at what point will you be convinced that this is a futile discussion? neither of you is going to budge. whats the sense in pursuing this.
Well as an agnostic, I allow for any possibility to be true. So I will always entertain evidence if it is provided and is credible. Though always expect me to be overly critical of evidence for ideas and theories that aren't "mainstream" so to speak. Most of the time that evidence is faulty.
and do you really think you will find anything in this thread that turns your beliefs and convictions on their heads? this is page 19 of what im sure isnt even your first thread concerning global floods. if it was gonna happen, it would have happened by now. so whats the game here?
I like the debate, and just because evidence surfacing against my ideas is unlikely, doesn't mean that I shouldn't pursue it. If I close my ears to the participants in this thread and write it off, I won't be able to see any good evidence posted. Just because I doubt that it exists, doesn't mean that it doesn't exist. How else would you suggest I keep an open mind?
At least in this thread there is more than one person debating the topic, unlike this thread which just has one person repeating the same nonsense over and over again. I've pretty much abandoned that thread.
hmm. okay. another question: since you seem to have a firm stance on the possibility (or lack thereof) of a global flood having occurred as recorded in the bible, what possibilities are you open to?
originally posted by: GoOfYFoOt
a reply to: Krazysh0t
Apparently, after a little more research, the photo that you pulled from the article, is in fact the 1/2 sized replica.
Here is the actual life-sized version...
I don't see a platform in this photo. The first one does appear to be stationary, as an attraction. But the full-sized one is meant to travel to different places, according to the builder.
originally posted by: TzarChasm
originally posted by: GoOfYFoOt
a reply to: Krazysh0t
Apparently, after a little more research, the photo that you pulled from the article, is in fact the 1/2 sized replica.
Here is the actual life-sized version...
I don't see a platform in this photo. The first one does appear to be stationary, as an attraction. But the full-sized one is meant to travel to different places, according to the builder.
has it done so?
This Ark is carried on a platform made up of 25 LASH barges and has a coaster's seaworthiness license.
originally posted by: GoOfYFoOt
a reply to: Krazysh0t
To that, I can only quote Matthew 19:26
"But Jesus beheld them, and said unto them, With men this is impossible; but with God all things are possible."
originally posted by: TzarChasm
originally posted by: GoOfYFoOt
a reply to: Krazysh0t
To that, I can only quote Matthew 19:26
"But Jesus beheld them, and said unto them, With men this is impossible; but with God all things are possible."
or you could just say, "gee, that's an excellent point, i must reevaluate my position in the subject"
Heck how about you reconcile how Noah even floated his ark? I have yet to see anyone explain to me how the ark with the dimensions specified in the bible was able to float. I've seen people say that god held it together (apparently god is a type of glue now). But that doesn't explain why god would demand that Noah create a structurally unsound ship, if in the end god was going to hold it together anyways. Couldn't god have just created the boat himself? Or if he really wanted Noah to work for the effort, make him build a structurally sound ship but change its interior dimensions (we are already in the realm of denying laws of physics). It seems like even a moron could figure out this, yet god doesn't and has to use this roundabout method of making the boat able to float.
originally posted by: GoOfYFoOt
originally posted by: TzarChasm
originally posted by: GoOfYFoOt
a reply to: Krazysh0t
To that, I can only quote Matthew 19:26
"But Jesus beheld them, and said unto them, With men this is impossible; but with God all things are possible."
or you could just say, "gee, that's an excellent point, i must reevaluate my position in the subject"
My position, is merely to further the dialog. As for my Faith, nothing man can say or do, will dissuade me from believing on the Almighty.
Unlike many men, who are full of themselves, I subscribe to the Ultimate Authority!
For I have humbled myself in awe of His presence, and found that which I was searching for...
originally posted by: TzarChasm
originally posted by: GoOfYFoOt
originally posted by: TzarChasm
originally posted by: GoOfYFoOt
a reply to: Krazysh0t
To that, I can only quote Matthew 19:26
"But Jesus beheld them, and said unto them, With men this is impossible; but with God all things are possible."
or you could just say, "gee, that's an excellent point, i must reevaluate my position in the subject"
My position, is merely to further the dialog. As for my Faith, nothing man can say or do, will dissuade me from believing on the Almighty.
Unlike many men, who are full of themselves, I subscribe to the Ultimate Authority!
For I have humbled myself in awe of His presence, and found that which I was searching for...
i wouldnt expect you to. the words of man are cheap, which is why the divorce rate is so damn high. what i would hope would dissuade you (or force you to question with sincerity) is cold hard evidence staring you in the face. such as evidence demonstrating that at the very most, the ark making a successful voyage is a very highly unlikely scenario as well as the global flood. and at the very least, both are frankly impossible.
We have no knowledge of what the Bible refers to as "gopher wood". We don't know it's weight, it's density, it's strength, it's buoyancy, or how long a plank made from it, could be! We don't know if it even exists, today, as it could have been a very isolated species, that only grew locally to the area where the Ark was constructed! It could have been eradicated by the flood to preserve free will!
SO...how can you be so sure that we are talking about a physical impossibility? Let alone a Divine one?
originally posted by: randyvs
a reply to: Barcs
4000-6000 years is the typical time frame given for the flood by its supporters.
I don't care. And till next time guys.