It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Sremmos80
a reply to: abe froman
It also shows that he had no GSR on his hand, so doesn't that go against the police narrative?
And the autopsy shows nothing either way as you quoted.
“It can be because he’s giving up, or because he’s charging forward at the officer.”
originally posted by: Blackmarketeer
Baden, also the former New York City medical examiner, told the Times that Brown was shot from a distance, explaining that no gunpowder suggesting point-blank gunfire was found on Brown’s body.
From multiple sources.
originally posted by: abe froman
a reply to: Mikeultra
That picture is old (not nearly as old as the one they gave as at first) so he's been doing that for some time.
(Doctor or corpsman?)
It doesn't do anything to their testimony but show they got one part mistaken.
The entry wounds to Brown's lower inner arm could have come from the front or back. We just don't know from the reports so far, though I think Dr. Baden suggests that they are all from the front. Witnesses said he was shot at from behind while running.
If any of them said he was shot in the back, then they are obviously wrong. You should quote the ones who explicitly said this to help your argument.