It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by stumason
I wouldn't trust a pure logical AI over a human any day. You cannot rely on it to take into account extenuating circumstances, or remorse, or anything else that may affect the outcome of a trial. The machine just would not understand, and pass a sentence that may not fit the crime.
Originally posted by stumason
How can you program a machine that has to emotion, to understand emotion? It would not be possible (maybe decades in the future, but not now) to make a machine capable of fully understanding human behaviour.
It's impossible for any judge to be capable of fully understanding human behaviour as well though.
They do the best that they can. As would the machine.
They would ot actually need to be able to understand human emotion liek you are thinking. They would merely need to be able to understand that it effects humans to do things and how it affects the current case.
Originally posted by Channy
how many lawsuits do you think are unbiased? a ai computer can be completely neutral apart from the rules its been given (like a constitution or something). why should we even give the person a chance - rules are rules. how many crimes are let off?
you people might not agree with it, but i believe sooner or later, the government will use AI machines. no one knows were AI will exactly lead to, only predict so who knows whether a computer has 5 senses to develop emotion part?
Originally posted by Amorymeltzer one of the things he espoused was that you need emotion. theres more to a case than just fact, theres moral fact.
Originally posted by Amorymeltzer a machine cannot understand post-partum depression,
Originally posted by Amorymeltzer it cannot understand being beaten and raped by your father for until you were 13.
Originally posted by Amorymeltzer and we are equally incapable of programming even a response to that.
Originally posted by Amorymeltzer you cannot mathematically express pain, love, hatred, depression, physical abuse.
Considering what's at stake with a death penalty case why would you want your judgement to be clouded by emotion?
Their have been a number of cases where an apparantly guilty man who was convicted based on victim testimony was let go when the evidence proved them wrong.
Can you? Can anyone who hasn't actually gone through that truelly understand it?
Originally posted by Amorymeltzer and we are equally incapable of programming even a response to that.
Sure you can.
So language can't express emotion now?
Anyone who actually knows anything about math knows that it is capable of expressing things that we don't have words for. And that if ever do meet an alien race that math will be the first langauge we understand of each other.