posted on Aug, 18 2014 @ 09:25 PM
I think it is a bone,I have seen many rocks which resemble things,some even resemble human faces,but this is beyond reasonable doubt to the visual
inspection a BONE of some type.
I COULD be swayed but ONLY if a few people begin posting their own rocks which look like bones to the degree this particular one does,barring this
event I am forced to accept that this is in fact a BONE of some type.
Oh and in case I forget to mention it,you only get to search for these "bone-rocks" in an area equivilant to the area covered by the machine taking
You see it is not as simple as it sounds to just say it is a rock when it does not look like a rock but looks instead like a bone,you must BETRAY
YOURSELF to NOT see a BONE first and a rock second.
Therefore for me it is a BONE and will remain so until someone can show me another different rock discovered under comparative circumstances which
looks like a BONE.
To say it is a rock until it is proven to be a bone when it looks like a bone is dyslexic and contrived,basiclly impossible.The ASSUMPTION is that
because it is surrounded by what look to be ROCKS that by proxy of its location alone it is in fact a rock,but this is presumptious,by the same
balance of evidence which we use to determine that in fact this particular BONE iS surrounded by ROCKS we must also find the BONE TO BE A BONE,for we
SEE the rocks and TRUST this to be fact, therefore unless we by some external means PROVE THE ROCKS WE CLAIM ARE ROCKS we must BY PROXY trust that the
BONE we see is in fact a BONE and not a rock.
The fact we can identify the majority of things in the picture as rocks validates the methodology behind our assertation that the rocks are in fact
rocks and means we can safely apply it to the BONE and trust our impression,
The "rocks" are rocks simply because they look like rocks and we all agree they are rocks but none of us have PROOF they are rocks and the
pricippals of PROOF we apply to determine ANYTHING to be a rock MUST ALSO by proxy determine the BONE TO BE A BONE.
We could ALL simply agree it is a BONE and it becmoes a bone until the people claiming it is a rock surrounded by other rocks can PROVE any rocks at
all tangibly exist,and if they do in fact come to an agreement that the things they all see are in fact rocks without tangible proof then the
processes they used to come to this conclusion MUST also find the bone to be a bone.It is NOT POSSIBLE for people to see things quite so differently
without encouragement via phonetics and constructural tactical language adjustments, one-offs and anomolys which do happen are eliminated from the
equation by simply limiting the "chances" in effect saying that if it is possible for there to be a rock that looks that much like a bone then they
must be plentiful enough to find another one while searching a comparatively sized random area.Searching the Earth for a bone looking rock will not
suffice,one must find one at a MINIMUM as bone looking as this one in the same circumstantial area as the machine found this one.