It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Ferguson, Missouri (CNN) -- An independent autopsy into the death of Michael Brown in Ferguson, Missouri, provides "ample" evidence to support the arrest of the police officer who shot him, family attorney Daryl Parks said Monday at a news conference.
Parks was particularly concerned about gunshots that medical examiners hired by the family indicate came from behind and above.
"Why would he be shot in the very top of his head, a 6-foot-4 man?" Parks asked. "Makes no sense."
originally posted by: vonclod
a reply to: thesmokingman
Autopsy found no evidence of a struggle..It gets interesting from here on.
originally posted by: HandyDandy
originally posted by: vonclod
a reply to: thesmokingman
Autopsy found no evidence of a struggle..It gets interesting from here on.
Not to mention no gun powder residue found on Brown.....
If he'd have been wrestling for the gun when it went off there would be gunpowder residue on him. Forensics do NOT lie.
originally posted by: thesmokingman
Of course the family attorney will say this. Unfortunately for him, the results will actually work against him and the witness testimony, as he was more than likely NOT running away as all the shots entered from the front. This contradicts the people saying he was running away when he was shot. The arm wounds probably came from when Brown was struggling for the officers weapon or during a struggle.
originally posted by: HandyDandy
originally posted by: vonclod
a reply to: thesmokingman
Autopsy found no evidence of a struggle..It gets interesting from here on.
Not to mention no gun powder residue found on Brown.....
If he'd have been wrestling for the gun when it went off there would be gunpowder residue on him. Forensics do NOT lie.
(3) "Forcible felony", any felony involving the use or threat of physical force or violence against any individual, including but not limited to murder, robbery, burglary, arson, kidnapping, assault, and any forcible sexual offense;
originally posted by: LDragonFire
If you were shot 5 times would you be attacking or surrendering?
If you were shot 5 times are you a threat?
The officer didn't report a officer involved shooting nor did he call a ambulance, but he did call in the need for back up.
Hmmm
And Brown was unarmed.
originally posted by: HandyDandy
originally posted by: vonclod
a reply to: thesmokingman
Autopsy found no evidence of a struggle..It gets interesting from here on.
Not to mention no gun powder residue found on Brown.....
If he'd have been wrestling for the gun when it went off there would be gunpowder residue on him. Forensics do NOT lie.
originally posted by: thesmokingman
a reply to: amazing
So, you have already convicted this man without knowing ANY of what actually happened? One day, one of these "murderers" may be there to "murder" someone to protect you or your family. Not ALL cops need to be regulated and charged, just because there are a few bad ones out there. It is pretty unfair of you to convict this man without knowing the facts, but that is your right I guess.
originally posted by: thesmokingman
a reply to: vonclod
Does not mean there was not a struggle. Brown was sure involved in a struggle with a local shop owner just before the shooting. This is on video, how did the autopsy not find evidence of that struggle? Point being, that not always does a struggle cause marks.