BREAKING: New Video Proves Michel Brown Attacked Officer Darren Wilson

page: 1
21
<<   2  3  4 >>

log in

join
+10 more 
posted on Aug, 18 2014 @ 09:01 AM
link   
mrconservative.com...


What I knew all along and what is being uncovered. Read under the video for more details.



A video that was posted on Thursday offers new evidence in the Michael Brown shooting, and it may vindicate Darren Wilson. The video begins just after Brown was shot, and the teen’s body can be seen in the street throughout the footage.

Listen carefully at the 6:30 mark to what the bystanders are saying. Judging from the transcript, they appear to be saying that Michael Brown attacked Officer Wilson.

#1 How’d he get from there to there?

#2 Because he ran, the police was still in the truck – cause he was like over the truck
{crosstalk}

#2 But him and the police was both in the truck, then he ran – the police got out and ran after him
{crosstalk}


As far as Mr. Conseravtive, it is the first place I saw it. Here are two more links.

www.dailymail.co.uk... d-Officer-Darren-Wilson.html

www.breitbart.com...


Firepiston
edit on 18-8-2014 by FirePiston because: (no reason given)
edit on Mon Aug 18 2014 by DontTreadOnMe because: EX TAGS ADDED IMPORTANT: Using Content From Other Websites on ATS



+26 more 
posted on Aug, 18 2014 @ 09:08 AM
link   
Jeezum. So sick of this video. And the agenda behind it. "Mr. Conservative" blog, really? LOL!

People dismiss the account of all of other witnesses but - they swear allegiance to some anonymous, garbled voice on a you tube video because it seemingly (but who can really tell as none of it is very clear) supports their confirmation bias.

Here's an idea...wait for the final investigative report. You know...those inconvenient facts....


The only thing that video tells me is that the police stood around doing not much of anything afterwards. Here is more proof of exactly that.

www.cnn.com...

None of it proves anything. Sick of it yet?
edit on 8/18/2014 by kosmicjack because: (no reason given)


+7 more 
posted on Aug, 18 2014 @ 09:10 AM
link   
a reply to: FirePiston

I saw this video yesterday and it doesn't prove ANYTHING.



posted on Aug, 18 2014 @ 09:12 AM
link   

originally posted by: kosmicjack
Jeezum. So sick of this video. And the agenda behind it. "Mr. Conservative" blog, really? LOL!

People dismiss the account of all of other witnesses but - they swear allegiance to some anonymous, garbled voice on a you tube video because it seemingly (but who can really tell as none of it is very clear) supports their confirmation bias.

Here's an idea...wait for the final investigative report. You know...those inconvenient facts....


One fact of the bullet wound on top of the head, consistant with leaning over/down, as in into a CAR? Also these statements fully tell the same story as the officers also. So forensics is backing it up but your still not wanting to buy it? Much like them people in Ferguson?
Firepiston



posted on Aug, 18 2014 @ 09:15 AM
link   
second hand heresay at best. if the dialogue wasn't added afterward. do we know who these 'bystanders' are?


+7 more 
posted on Aug, 18 2014 @ 09:22 AM
link   
a reply to: FirePiston

I think you lost the plot here a bit.



One of the bullets entered the top of Mr. Brown’s skull, suggesting his head was bent forward when it struck him and caused a fatal injury, according to Dr. Michael M. Baden, the former chief medical examiner for the City of New York, who flew to Missouri on Sunday at the family’s request to conduct the separate autopsy. It was likely the last of bullets to hit him, he said.

www.nytimes.com...


Michael Brown was some 30 feet away from the car when he died.

You wont find the truth on mrconservative.com.




Here's an idea...wait for the final investigative report. You know...those inconvenient facts....


This.




edit on 18-8-2014 by Millers because: (no reason given)
edit on 18-8-2014 by Millers because: sheesh



posted on Aug, 18 2014 @ 09:25 AM
link   

originally posted by: Millers
a reply to: FirePiston

I think you lost the plot here a bit.



One of the bullets entered the top of Mr. Brown’s skull, suggesting his head was bent forward when it struck him and caused a fatal injury, according to Dr. Michael M. Baden, the former chief medical examiner for the City of New York, who flew to Missouri on Sunday at the family’s request to conduct the separate autopsy. It was likely the last of bullets to hit him, he said.

www.nytimes.com...


Michael Brown was some 30 feet away from the car when he died.

You wont find the truth on mrconservative.com.




Here's an idea...wait for the final investigative report. You know...those inconvenient facts....


This.






People take head wounds all the time and can still function. While most of the time a head shot is instant lights out, many cases have shown the opposite.
Firepiston



posted on Aug, 18 2014 @ 09:26 AM
link   
a reply to: FirePiston




One fact of the bullet wound on top of the head, consistant with leaning over/down, as in into a CAR? Also these statements fully tell the same story as the officers also. So forensics is backing it up but your still not wanting to buy it? Much like them people in Ferguson?
Firepiston




The bullets did not appear to have been shot from very close range because no gunpowder was present on his body.

try reading the autopsy again

Is it ignorance, lack of comprehension or cognitive bias? I'm going with comprehension.



posted on Aug, 18 2014 @ 09:26 AM
link   
www.breitbart.com...

www.dailymail.co.uk... d-Officer-Darren-Wilson.html

Firepiston
edit on 18-8-2014 by FirePiston because: (no reason given)


+9 more 
posted on Aug, 18 2014 @ 09:29 AM
link   
a reply to: FirePiston

Oh well, if it's on Breitbart it must be true and objective. A thousand pardons.



posted on Aug, 18 2014 @ 09:31 AM
link   
Well the facts will come out regardless. Not going to argue over it here. Take care!
Firepiston



posted on Aug, 18 2014 @ 09:33 AM
link   

originally posted by: InverseLookingGlass
a reply to: FirePiston




One fact of the bullet wound on top of the head, consistant with leaning over/down, as in into a CAR? Also these statements fully tell the same story as the officers also. So forensics is backing it up but your still not wanting to buy it? Much like them people in Ferguson?
Firepiston






The bullets did not appear to have been shot from very close range because no gunpowder was present on his body.

try reading the autopsy again

Is it ignorance, lack of comprehension or cognitive bias? I'm going with comprehension.


Did you read it?
From the link you provided....

However, that determination could change if it turns out that there is gunshot residue on Mr. Brown’s clothing, to which Dr. Baden did not have access.



posted on Aug, 18 2014 @ 09:34 AM
link   

originally posted by: kosmicjack
a reply to: FirePiston

Oh well, if it's on Breitbart it must be true and objective. A thousand pardons.


It is on quite a few websites.
Firepiston



posted on Aug, 18 2014 @ 09:35 AM
link   
a reply to: butcherguy

And that's a good point - we just don't have all of the facts yet to determine how the incident went down.


+10 more 
posted on Aug, 18 2014 @ 09:36 AM
link   
If it was revealed today that the young man was on PCP, had just killed a kitteh, and was charging the cop with a backpack nuke it would not change a damned thing.

The violence that is occurring in Ferguson is running on its own momentum.

No amount of words, thoughts, or prayers are going to get through.



posted on Aug, 18 2014 @ 09:40 AM
link   
a reply to: FirePiston

I guess the thing is... you posted inconclusive video and the title says "proves". Plus it's sourced from a political blog and it's posted in one of the political forums.

I just think political exploitation - from both sides - is what has this entire Ferguson incident blown out of proportion.
edit on 8/18/2014 by kosmicjack because: (no reason given)



posted on Aug, 18 2014 @ 09:42 AM
link   

originally posted by: kosmicjack
Jeezum. So sick of this video. And the agenda behind it. "Mr. Conservative" blog, really? LOL!

People dismiss the account of all of other witnesses but - they swear allegiance to some anonymous, garbled voice on a you tube video because it seemingly (but who can really tell as none of it is very clear) supports their confirmation bias.

Here's an idea...wait for the final investigative report. You know...those inconvenient facts....


The only thing that video tells me is that the police stood around doing not much of anything afterwards. Here is more proof of exactly that.

www.cnn.com...

None of it proves anything. Sick of it yet?
Deny ignorance. The voice you heard on the video was candid. No reason to lie.



posted on Aug, 18 2014 @ 09:43 AM
link   
a reply to: Bilk22

But we have no idea who he is, where he was during the shooting or even if he was repeating second hand info. Deny Ignorance indeed.
edit on 8/18/2014 by kosmicjack because: (no reason given)



posted on Aug, 18 2014 @ 09:50 AM
link   
a reply to: FirePiston




People take head wounds all the time and can still function. While most of the time a head shot is instant lights out, many cases have shown the opposite.


Not even mrconservative is trying to claim M. Brown was in the car when he got shot in the head.


“[Brown] just started bum rushing [Wilson],” the caller said. “He just started coming at him full speed. And, so [Wilson] just started shooting.”


You should stick with 'bum rushing', sounds much more promising./sarc

edit on 18-8-2014 by Millers because: for clarity's sake



posted on Aug, 18 2014 @ 09:55 AM
link   
This idiotic claim that the gunshot to the top of the head "proves" he was "bumrushing" the cop is grasping at straws, as if people run at 90 degrees to the ground. More like the first shots to the body caused the victim to double up, then the headshots (two of them).






top topics



 
21
<<   2  3  4 >>

log in

join