It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
A catering company called Dirty Bird Fried Chicken aroused some controversy with its suggestive logo.
Some people who see the logo think it resembles a rooster. Others think it resembles a penis at the point of no return.
Mark James, the logo's designer insists it's supposed to be a barnyard bird.
“We were given the name Dirty Bird as the brief, and started working on ideas. We looked at the initials, DB. Then worked with the lowercase ‘db’ linking them to form the shape of a rooster. It’s a graphic representation of a rooster incorporating the initials. It depends on how you look at it," he said according to the Mirror. “I’m not sure there have been any complaints. A few comments, but it’s in the eye of the beholder, as they say.”
Company owner Neil Young insists he never intended the logo for his Cardiff, Wales food truck to appear phallic.
“We’ve never really thought about it like that. Our designer created a d and b for ‘dirty bird’ then pushed them together to make a cockerel,” he told Wales Online.
Just to be clear: Dictionary.com defines "cockerel" as "a young domestic cock, usually less than a year old." And the word "cock" in this definition means "rooster."
Young and James may be crying fowl about the reaction to the allegedly unintended innuendo, but it should be noted that the food truck does also have saucy giant posters telling customers to “Touch My Thigh” and “Touch My Breast.”
originally posted by: OccamsRazor04
Definitely looks like a cock that is crowing to me.
originally posted by: Maltese5Rhino
a reply to: Kangaruex4Ewe
I for one, think the logo was designed on purpose to be provocative possibly more tongue in cheek to be fair. It seems to have worked because it gets people talking about the place.
I feel we are in a time where everyone feels offended left right and center about something or another. If there isnt anything to be offended by, im sure someone will find it.
There is a picture of a vase, Like an allusion where it depicts two images, one looks like several dolphins within the vase and the other a couple in an embrace. I think there was a test done and every child said the picture was of dolphins and every adult stated they can see the couple.
I don't think I can post the pic on ATS as it is instantly obvious for me its the couple in the embrace
How I see it, we only get images in our mind and persive them as 'wrong' it was our mind that went to that conclusion of the image first. If people get offended by the rooster logo then they are offending thier own minds IMO. Good find OP
originally posted by: OccamsRazor04
a reply to: Kangaruex4Ewe
Simply put I agree. If a child sees something dirty then the parents need to start looking at where that came from. It was not the DB logo.
originally posted by: borntowatch
Reminds me of the A Stlye logo.
It doesnt get any more overt than that one, well maybe the db logo is just as bad
www.cbsnews.com...
but of course there is nothing wrong with any of this, its just marketing
The French Connection United Kingdom, logo rates as very poor taste as well
FCUK
www.independent.co.uk...
Won't someone please think of the children and their tiny little child retinas, relaying the tiny little messages to their brain.
“We’ve never really thought about it like that. Our designer created a d and b for ‘dirty bird’ then pushed them together to make a cockerel,” he told Wales Online.
Just to be clear: Dictionary.com defines "cockerel" as "a young domestic cock, usually less than a year old." And the word "cock" in this definition means "rooster."
Young and James may be crying fowl about the reaction to the allegedly unintended innuendo, but it should be noted that the food truck does also have saucy giant posters telling customers to “Touch My Thigh” and “Touch My Breast.”
'FCKU'