It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: scghst1
originally posted by: truckdriver42
I'm not buying any of this false outrage. Brown was a thug and at least 12 people are reporting he charged the officer. At that point he deserved to be shot however many times it took to put the rabid dog down.
Been following this story from Day 1. Can you please post a source for this unsubstantiated claim you have made?
originally posted by: scghst1
originally posted by: truckdriver42
I'm not buying any of this false outrage. Brown was a thug and at least 12 people are reporting he charged the officer. At that point he deserved to be shot however many times it took to put the rabid dog down.
Been following this story from Day 1. Can you please post a source for this unsubstantiated claim you have made?
originally posted by: diggindirt
You posted something that showed what the reporter called a Molotov cocktail that was thrown after the police had already attacked.
Let me be clear here---that was not a Molotov cocktail. I've seen cocktails thrown and the results are more like the image posted by someone earlier.
sigh...it's a sad day when I have to explain to people what a Molotov cocktail is...
Just because a reporter doesn't know what he's seeing and makes an error in reporting---like the guy who thought foam ear plugs were rubber bullets---doesn't mean that we have to go along with their error.
Your claim that the Chop Suey was burned down was completely false as shown by Vice's report as he walked by it earlier this evening. It is obviously still standing and not noticeably damaged by fire.
To keep repeating that it was a Molotov cocktail is simply spreading dis-information.
You are correct in saying that some of us get passionate. We lived through 1968 and saw the damage that these thugs can do to entire towns. We watched the police departments turn dogs and water cannons on people who were doing nothing but standing or sitting for their rights as human beings.
originally posted by: truckdriver42
a reply to: jholt5638
I have a feeling you will very soon. Even if they had clear video of the foaming rabid Mike Brown charging the officer, people will continue to believe Mike Brown was an innocent angel.
On the other side, this is a 28 year old cop with no reports or incidents on his record but people give a thug that committed strong armed robbery the benefit of the doubt? LOL.. Classic ideology of the lazy left.
I can't wait for the cop to be exonerated as I am almost positive he will be. Then we will see Ferguson burn again. This time they should let it all go..
originally posted by: roadgravel
a reply to: EyesOpenMouthShut
Might it be since he tried to take the officer's weapon, the officer saw this as a very deadly situation. I would think if someone goes for a firearm their intent is to inflict serious injury. The officer also doesn't know if the man has a concealed weapon (firearm, knife) when he starts his pursuit.
Just bringing up some possible thoughts.
originally posted by: roadgravel
a reply to: EyesOpenMouthShut
Might it be since he tried to take the officer's weapon, the officer saw this as a very deadly situation. I would think if someone goes for a firearm their intent is to inflict serious injury. The officer also doesn't know if the man has a concealed weapon (firearm, knife) when he starts his pursuit.
Just bringing up some possible thoughts.
originally posted by: EyesOpenMouthShut
I understand that and don't rule it out but the thing is once contact is broken and the suspect becomes distanced then turns back, its not imminent threat to life and limb anymore, still a serious situation but not life threatening.
originally posted by: roadgravel
a reply to: Xcathdra
I doubt any person in that situation is going to stop and try to switch to a tazer in the short time ase a person starts to move back toward them, if that is what happened.
originally posted by: EyesOpenMouthShut
a reply to: Xcathdra
Hey, whats good for the goose should be good for the gander right?
everyday citizens get charged with murder all the time for their actions in similar situations simply because of that one small event that happens right after the perpetrator flees the immediate personal space zone.
originally posted by: Mikeultra
a reply to: EyesOpenMouthShut
If Mike Brown had already been shot while punching the officer in his SUV, and still he had not stopped aggressive actions, what makes you think the cop should then resort to less effective means at stopping the threat to his life? Have you never seen criminals pull the taser darts out? Mike Brown was an out of control criminal.
originally posted by: EyesOpenMouthShut
Because the guy ran, thats why.
tasers have a secondary stun gun function when the dart pack is removed.
Killing should be the absolute last resort by police.