It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: amurphy245
a reply to: Ove38
Because we need to first discover evidence of potential life on mars ,planting life would contaminate potential findings
originally posted by: stormbringer1701
if i understand correctly this has already happened with insulation on the viking landers. also if humans go anywhere so will our mites, gut fauna, urine fauna, mouth bacteria and so forth. so if we colonize mars we will contaminate it. i would not be surprised if some of the lunar astronauts have not left behind bags of urine or poop or other contaminants.
may as well lob a few thousand tardigrades out there.
Perhaps there already are, the ISS dumps its human waste overboard, the junk in orbit is, in my opinion, now covered in human 'goo'.
originally posted by: skunkape23
Why would we want to do that? We could send microbes to other planets that could potentially wipe out civilizations.
A team of undergraduates from Stanford and Brown Universities are busy applying synthetic biology to space exploration, outfitting microbes to survive extreme Martian conditions and produce resources needed to sustain a human colony.
originally posted by: lostbook
As I understand it, Earth gets contaminated by other-worldly microbes all the time. Panspermia? Whatever it's called, I don't think humans should limit ourselves because of our own fear(s).
originally posted by: MysterX
originally posted by: skunkape23
Why would we want to do that? We could send microbes to other planets that could potentially wipe out civilizations.
It's actually being worked on right now.
I read an article where University graduates are engineering bacteria to survive conditions on Mars, with a view to placing them there.
It's basically crude, early baby steps towards terraforming Mars.
A team of undergraduates from Stanford and Brown Universities are busy applying synthetic biology to space exploration, outfitting microbes to survive extreme Martian conditions and produce resources needed to sustain a human colony.
Link:
Wired.com
To be really successful, the bacteria must do more than just survive on Mars. They need to perform functions useful for establishing a human colony one day. In addition to the Hell Cell suite, the team is developing bacteria that could extract minerals from Martian sediment or recycle rare metals from spacecraft electronics.
The team’s main focus is on the latter, which requires engineering bacteria to separate metals from the silica that coats most electronics.
These projects expand on a Mars theme started last year, when the team designed BioBricks that allow bacteria to produce a cement-like material for building, and sugar for feeding other microbes.
Usefulness aside, sending bacteria to Mars poses certain ethical concerns. “If you were to release something into the environment that killed off the native fauna, that would be devastating to science,” said Burnier. But if there isn’t life there, and engineered bacteria could help humans explore, “the argument could be made that it would be a good thing.”
originally posted by: MysterX
a reply to: JadeStar
Frankly, concern for indigenous life is all well and good, and i'm personally for safeguards to protect it, but historically, it has never been a barrier to Human expansionism on Earth, with myriad examples of such trampling spread throughout our recorded history.
I doubt Human planetary colonisation would be any different...
especially if there are rich pickings in terms of resources to be scooped up and brought home.