It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Gryphon66
Ferguson Police chief states quite clearly that Officer Wilson DID NOT KNOW THAT Brown had "stolen cigars." Check.
...
These are UNDISPUTED FACTS.
originally posted by: loam
originally posted by: Gryphon66
Ferguson Police chief states quite clearly that Officer Wilson DID NOT KNOW THAT Brown had "stolen cigars." Check.
...
These are UNDISPUTED FACTS.
Would you also agree it's a fact the Brown and Johnson knew THEY had just jacked-up a convenience store and clerk some 15 minutes earlier?
Brown clearly was capable of violence.
I doubt the thought had not crossed either person's mind that the reason the LEO stopped them was for Brown's earlier actions.
Those facts change much, in my view.
It isn't so cut and dry anymore.
I think we have to wait for the autopsy report.
Use of force in defense of persons.
563.031. 1. A person may, subject to the
provisions of subsection 2 of this section, use
physical force upon another person when and to
the extent he or she reasonably believes such
force to be necessary to defend himself or herself
or a third person from what he or she reasonably
believes to be the use or imminent use of unlawful
force by such other person, unless:
(b) He or she is a law enforcement officer and as such is an aggressor pursuant to section 563.046; or
(3) The actor was attempting to commit,
committing, or escaping after the commission of a
forcible felony.
2. A person may not use deadly force upon
another person under the circumstances specified
in subsection 1 of this section unless:
(1) He or she reasonably believes that such deadly force is necessary to protect himself, or herself or her unborn child, or another against death, serious physical injury, or any forcible felony;
originally posted by: Ex
Or the policecar video, where is that anyway?
a reply to: loam
originally posted by: Ex
A young unarmedman is DEAD!
I just read through some of your past threads and posts and:
I will defend your right to say anything,
I sure will not be giving them ANY weight!
a reply to: Libertygal
originally posted by: Ex
WOW!!!
That's more frightening news!
Police don't have to answer to anyone? Seems the people of Ferguson might think they do, as in the FBI and Federal laws!
a reply to: Libertygal
originally posted by: kosmicjack
a reply to: Libertygal
How did he withhold evidence? They didn't even bother questioning him until later. Don't you think he would be arrested/charged if any of what you claim was true? Even if only to support their ever-changing story?
The cop was injured. FACT. This is the most damning, and truly, the center of the entire case.
originally posted by: loam
a reply to: xuenchen
originally posted by: xuenchen
But I bet Brown *Thought* the cop knew and I bet that is what started Brown's rage
You raise an interesting point.
For context, (I've posted this elsewhere), here is the location of the shooting and the distance to the Quik Trip:
According to the police reports, officers indicate they received a robbery call at the Quik Trip at 11:51.
At 12:04, officers are dispatched to Brown's shooting.
So only somewhere between 13-19 minutes had elapsed between the two events.
Very interesting point.