It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus
a reply to: mekhanics
Brilliant. Getting chased by a man with a machete when you should either be tazing or shooting him.
Ridiculous.
originally posted by: HawkeyeNation
Brown was fleeing but how in the # is the cop to know that he won't go and take someone else's life, steal a car that could have children in them.
originally posted by: crazyewok
Still the shooting is only justified if he was armed and had his gun drawn.
Maybe its my wimpy British Upbringing and weird British Values
But the police should NEVER shoot EVER unless a suspect is armed and a direct threat to the public.
The police are NOT there too be judge jury and executioner.
originally posted by: crazyewok
Why shoot him?
Police are not there too dish out punishment...
originally posted by: HawkeyeNation
Brown was fleeing but how in the # is the cop to know that he won't go and take someone else's life, steal a car that could have children in them.
originally posted by: EyesOpenMouthShut
Shoplifting. really.
originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus
originally posted by: HawkeyeNation
Brown was fleeing but how in the # is the cop to know that he won't go and take someone else's life, steal a car that could have children in them.
That is not for law enforcement to determine, they are not Judge Dredd.
The initial shooting my very well have been justified but I can be fairly certain that academy training does not involve shooting suspects in the back or with their hands up if this is what actually transpired.
originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus
originally posted by: crazyewok
US cops :Shoot on sight
UK Police: Throw bins at them.
Frankly, if someone came at me with a machete I would shoot them instead of shoving my garbage can at them.
originally posted by: HawkeyeNation
But the cop needs to use his judgement to determine if that criminal is a threat to others. The kid very well might not have been a threat...we just don't know.
originally posted by: crazyewok
Your not police officer.
I hold them to a much higher standard.
If they dont need to use lethal force then they shouldn't.
originally posted by: crazyewok
Still the shooting is only justified if he was armed and had his gun drawn.
Maybe its my wimpy British Upbringing and weird British Values
But the police should NEVER shoot EVER unless a suspect is armed and a direct threat to the public.
The police are NOT there too be judge jury and executioner.
originally posted by: crazyewok
originally posted by: HawkeyeNation
Brown was fleeing but how in the # is the cop to know that he won't go and take someone else's life, steal a car that could have children in them.
THAT IS ABSOLUTE BULL #!
Police are not there to be jury and make decision on what they MAY do.
You should NEVER shoot something for just robbery or running from the police!
If he was not armed there was NO justification.
By your logic the police should shoot jay walkers or speeders? O lets just execute random people based on what they MAY do.
a NON violent crimes only deserves NON violent action by the police!
originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus
I agreed with you but there are plenty of circumstances were it is perfectly justified.